FieryTrainwreck said:
I think pointing to the popularity of a thing as an indicator of its quality is a poor argument.
Countering this argument by pointing out the thing isn't very popular when you consider the entire population of the planet (which makes food, water, and oxygen the only truly popular things) is one of the "smarter" things I've ever seen.
You put it in better detail. I really didn't understand what you meant. I guess I'm not that smart.
I used to think popularity was an indicator of quality, and sometimes it is, so I can see where people believe it's the only way. Though I stopped believing that when I saw some people on TV go into great great detail in about industry's and it changed my perception altogether.
It was when I was first told "the world is big enough for all different types", the strategy's professionals use to appeal to more audiences, the psychology behind marketing, how sex can change everything, why obscure and controversial work can be risky, tying in with trends, etc. etc. This was based on the media, and from then on I became more open as well as more skeptical.
I'm saying this because there are special strategy's to create popularity (yes, actually create), and I'm sure all these big company's use them, exploiting loopholes where ever they can and testing durability of certain things. However, some of it doesn't need a strategy at all. Sometimes controversial topics or mimicking trends can do all the work by itself, which I'm sure we've all seen before. And not only that, but sometimes popularity becomes even more popular because there happens to be many people who just want to be part of something popular.