Atkinson plays no role in the actual banning of material, he is simply the only governor who won't vote it in (all the others have voted for it in the past, in fact I beleive the QLD representative is veto-ing him and is in the process of creating a state R18 classification for games). It was the classification board (a group of senile old bats who are equally out of touch with reality) who are apparently so far behind in zombie trends that they are aware most zombies are humans that have been infected with some kind of virus.imahobbit4062 said:I think that's how Atkinson got it banned in the first place.Dys said:Actually, they are 'infected'. Had they used a different word (like, as you suggested, zombified) I'm almost positive the game wouldn't have been banned. I read something (at the time, from the board) along the lines of "killing of humans infected with a rabies like virus is morally detestable" and thus the banningtk1989 said:I think tis because in L4D2 you are killing humans. Granted, they are zombified, but they are Humans nevertheless, and the environment has a realistic feel about it too. In Dantes Inferno u arent slaughtering humans, and in GoW3 I have no idea what you are killing but its not aiming for the most realistic gaming experience is it?The Blue Mongoose said:I'm sure the other Aussies on this site have been following the hype around Dante's Inferno. Murderous babies, boob demons, demon wang, violence violence violence! Somehow the Australian review board felt that this was fine for an MA15+ rating.
Left 4 Dead 2 was refused classification.
Let that just sink in for a bit. Yeah, that's what I thought too.
Further, God of War 3 has also been given an MA15+ rating. Can anyone explain this to me? Australians get a butchered version of L4D2, and yet neither of these games have been censored. AvP was held up and examined, and was almost refused classification, but that decision was reviewed. We're getting that too.
So very much happy news. However, I am confused. What the hell Aussie Classification Board!?
So yeah, I'm far more surprised that the veiwing of a womans (it's apparently OK for men to wander around shirtless) bare chest being allowed, andsomewhatgobsmacked as to why a penis isn't instantly rejected, I mean, think of the children and how terribly nudity within (or without) a sexual context could harm them [sub]or something[/sub]!?
"Calling them Infected was too realistic" or some bullshit like that.
The whole situation is absurd, and the most depressing part is that it is so far from the biggest the biggest censorship problem in this country.....The way things are going it's conceivable that people like me will end up fleeing the country in some 10 or 15 years :\