Dating norms need to change

Recommended Videos

Aulleas123

New member
Aug 12, 2009
365
0
0
So the OP is suggesting that we turn over our mating rituals engrained by several thousands of years of human evolution? Rapid change to satisfy individuals instead of having those individuals cope with the world around us... exactly what's wrong with our world today.

Look, I'm not saying that it sucks for me (as a guy) to have to push myself out there awkwardly just to get a conversation. However billions of men in history have been able to be successful at dating women through these standards and I'm sure that many other men (probably in the billions too) have succeeded by following these proposed standards as well.

It all comes to the point that sex/romance/love/lust is weird.
 

Shamanic Rhythm

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,653
0
0
Icehearted said:
I was speaking with a woman about the impressions each sex has of the other, referring to a conversation I overheard where three women were talking about the coffee shop where they worked at, and being afraid to close up after dark. I live in a fairly innocuous neighborhood, but grew up in a violent city, so I was conflicted. Basically, the conversation was three women deciding that pretty much all men were out to rape them at any given moment, and being women, they were under constant threat by men, and they were helpless in the likely event they would be raped.

To my companion, I suggested that the perception that all men are rape-monsters with potentially lethal amounts of lust boiling inside us all was silly, offensive, and unfair. She agreed, but said it was a societally formed discrimination. For a man to approach a woman in a place that is not designated for doing so (such places being parties, nightclubs, etc) he is going to be perceived as a threat. A woman walking alone at night will do her best to avoid men. She admitted it was totally sexist, and offered nothing more as far as to how this perception could be averted.

Therein lies the point. This is sexism, this is discrimination, and it's tolerated by too many people. There isn't much men can do, we've been openly emasculated in most forms of media for decades, and this will likely never end because too many people are either totally for it or just plain apathetic.

Used to be people understood what flirting was, these days it seems everything is considered flirting, and it's up to men to figure out when they mean it or they do not. She smiles at you, she's not flirting, she just smiled at you, or maybe she's flirting? How would we know? What are we to do? How can we even say hello without getting maced for secretly being rape-monsters?

Rhetorical questions, there are no answers.
I think you're conflating a few issues here. Women have every right to be concerned about being approached in a situation they're not comfortable with. To suggest though that that logic of 'all men are rapists' carries over into the dating world is a bit much. If you politely approach a woman in a socially acceptable fashion, no one's going to begrudge you. Except possibly any husband or boyfriend she has hanging around.
 

JakePwnsAtLife

New member
Mar 7, 2008
160
0
0
Shark Wrangler said:
Pretty much have to agree on the girl being in control. Yeah there is not much of a difference between having a girlfriend and getting a hooker. Really break it down for a minute and think about it. After spending money on all the dinners, movies, lunches, events she wants to go to, your paying for sex. Many women don't start paying for stuff till way later in the relationship. I mean at least with a hooker you just throw the money down and get what you want right out of the gate. Do get to have more sex with a girlfriend, your still shelling out money. How often do you spend money on your friends like that. Every once in awhile I will buy stuff for my friend, not all the time. Always laugh my ass off when women say it isn't true. Don't tell me for one second that your boyfriend doesn't spend money on you at least once a week.

My boyfriend DOES NOT spend money on me once a week. We always go dutch for dinner and pay for ourselves at events because we're both independent people who like spending time together and we both have good paying jobs. Way to generalize both genders by suggesting that all men want is sex and not a meaningful, loving relationship with someone and all women do is ride along for free dinners.

Wonder why this guy is single, truly, it is just dumbfounding me. And if he isn't, I wonder how long he would be in a relationship if he showed his significant other this post.~
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
Aprilgold said:
I can't count how many times that is wrong with me, mainly because I see women as a rose bush, their nice and pretty, romantic, sometimes even flutter in the wind, but try and grab them and you get your hand cut up. Very rarely will you find one that is nicer then the rest and will let itself into your grasp.

Overall, as you can tell, I really don't think their delicate, many times they backstab both friends, family, and many others over petty things, then get away Scot free.
You know what your problem is?

You think women are a "They."

That they're somehow different than you.
Women just have a hole where your hanger is, and all the other differences come down to social differences. You know, the same sorts of things that makes you, as an individual, different from the person your great great grandfather was.

Your bad relationship experience isn't that women are all cold and heartless but attractive things that hate you.
Unless you're being forced into marriage or something, bad relationships are because of your problems.

If you've been in a shitty relationship in the past, then fine. Acknowledge what you did to get yourself into this mess, realise that the cruelties of your partner are specific to that individual woman, and we'd be happy to help.
I mean, if its really extreme, like people who seem so damn perfect and manipulate their partner into a position of vulnerability, (like with child custody or citizenship status) sometimes it isn't really the individual's fault. Even then, though, I expect the victim to not then proceed to proclaim that all people of the opposite sex are manipulative, abusive people.

But you are insisting that, because of my sex, I am a selfish, unkind person who will backstab someone given the chance just because I am female. You are insulting me. You are insulting all women, and then you're using negative reactions to prove your point to yourself.
You have a problem here, and you need to accept that its your issue, not half the human race's.

Icehearted said:
I was speaking with a woman about the impressions each sex has of the other, referring to a conversation I overheard where three women were talking about the coffee shop where they worked at, and being afraid to close up after dark. I live in a fairly innocuous neighborhood, but grew up in a violent city, so I was conflicted. Basically, the conversation was three women deciding that pretty much all men were out to rape them at any given moment, and being women, they were under constant threat by men, and they were helpless in the likely event they would be raped.

To my companion, I suggested that the perception that all men are rape-monsters with potentially lethal amounts of lust boiling inside us all was silly, offensive, and unfair. She agreed, but said it was a societally formed discrimination. For a man to approach a woman in a place that is not designated for doing so (such places being parties, nightclubs, etc) he is going to be perceived as a threat. A woman walking alone at night will do her best to avoid men. She admitted it was totally sexist, and offered nothing more as far as to how this perception could be averted.

Therein lies the point. This is sexism, this is discrimination, and it's tolerated by too many people. There isn't much men can do, we've been openly emasculated in most forms of media for decades, and this will likely never end because too many people are either totally for it or just plain apathetic.

Used to be people understood what flirting was, these days it seems everything is considered flirting, and it's up to men to figure out when they mean it or they do not. She smiles at you, she's not flirting, she just smiled at you, or maybe she's flirting? How would we know? What are we to do? How can we even say hello without getting maced for secretly being rape-monsters?

Rhetorical questions, there are no answers.
I know too many people who were raped and molested, and even a couple people who were brutally raped and subsequently murdered in very traumatic ways to not have an acute fear on the matter of sexual assault.

And all of these acts were committed by men. And yes, women perpetrate such actions, too, but that's typically more towards their own opposite sex.
Considering my age, statistics, and the kind of people I catch staring at my ass, if I get sexually assaulted, its probably going to be at the hands of a man.
No, this does not mean that all men are rapists, and yes, danger can come from women, too, but it does bother me a bit when someone is insulted that I'm not going to strike up a casual conversation with some stranger on the street at night.

Edit:
I shouldn't leave this comment like this, because he isn't implying that being afraid of rape is wrong, its the reaction to it.
And yes, it is discrimination to treat every man like a potential rapist, but of all the discrimination out there these days, this, sadly, is one of the most rational ones out there. I'm sorry, I don't want to go making pointless accusations, and I'm not going to judge a person's character based on statistics. But with all the dangers of the world, people are one of the most complex ones to address.
But while I'm at it, I'm wary of everyone, as most people have reason to be. Its just that rape is a particularly scary reason for being wary, and many people don't know how to be tactful in their suspicions and not go about saying that everyone's potential sex offenders.

And that last part about conversations with strangers at night, that refers to an uncomfortable situation that happened last week at 2:30 AM ish while I was outside a building waiting for a ride that was late, and not an implication of the poster's intentions.
 

JakePwnsAtLife

New member
Mar 7, 2008
160
0
0
tobyornottoby said:
Riku said:
I've seen/heard/spoken to a large number of women who are all seeking 'the perfect guy' or 'mr right' or something along those lines but either they don't want to know when a nice guy turns up and he's not quite as model-esque as they'd hoped and he's just a regular guy
While at the same time that 'nice guy' has no interest in the 'nice girl' who is not quite as model-esque as he'd hoped and she's just a regular girl...

http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2007/12/16/the-internet-nice-guy-rears-his-ugly-head-once-more/
Hear hear!!

Yeah, that is a two way street fellas. You all don't look at the homely girls either. You expect the model-looking women to drop their standards for you, but you never drop yours for the nice, amazing personality girl who happens to have a few extra pounds or looks a little plain. If you do, then congrats, and you're probably a lot closer to having a relationship.
 

Aprilgold

New member
Apr 1, 2011
1,995
0
0
Erana said:
Aprilgold said:
I can't count how many times that is wrong with me, mainly because I see women as a rose bush, their nice and pretty, romantic, sometimes even flutter in the wind, but try and grab them and you get your hand cut up. Very rarely will you find one that is nicer then the rest and will let itself into your grasp.

Overall, as you can tell, I really don't think their delicate, many times they backstab both friends, family, and many others over petty things, then get away Scot free.
You know what your problem is?

You think women are a "They."

That they're somehow different than you.
Women just have a hole where your hanger is, and all the other differences come down to social differences. You know, the same sorts of things that makes you, as an individual, different from the person your great great grandfather was.

Your bad relationship experience isn't that women are all cold and heartless but attractive things that hate you.
Unless you're being forced into marriage or something, bad relationships are because of your problems.

If you've been in a shitty relationship in the past, then fine. Acknowledge what you did to get yourself into this mess, realise that the cruelties of your partner are specific to that individual woman, and we'd be happy to help.
I mean, if its really extreme, like people who seem so damn perfect and manipulate their partner into a position of vulnerability, (like with child custody or citizenship status) sometimes it isn't really the individual's fault. Even then, though, I expect the victim to not then proceed to proclaim that all people of the opposite sex are manipulative, abusive people.

But you are insisting that, because of my sex, I am a selfish, unkind person who will backstab someone given the chance just because I am female. You are insulting me. You are insulting all women, and then you're using negative reactions to prove your point to yourself.
You have a problem here, and you need to accept that its your issue, not half the human race's.
Erm, no, thats why the analogy up at the top of the speech said
"Very rarely will you find one that is nicer then the rest and will let itself into your grasp." Because like guys, some are major pricks, and some are very nice, but many are / were mean to me for many years in increasing numbers of severity. I can probably reword the top of the phrase for it to make more sense, but, again, I see it as a rose among a rosebush sort of deal, but thats my personal view. Hell, what is my first sentence of me quoting that person.
"I can't count how many times that is wrong with me" Read that a few times, it says WITH ME, and this thread has been making sweeping generalizations the whole bloody time, why is my post anger such wrath.

Again, I could reword that better, but, once again its a personal view of mine, and I may be a ass for saying it, but a lot of my friends do so much for each of their gals and never gets a single thank you from them, and many times they lie and say their going to leave him if he doesn't do X thing, they have done some very extreme thing for each of their chicks, but don't get much thanks for any of it. Madam, I'm not insulting women, Roses are symbolic for being both pretty and bright, however, the stem is covered in thorns, this basically is symbolic for basically standing for that their pretty, bright *smart* but can be hard to grasp *fall in love with / be mean* this is not a insult, as it is very symbolic of how women have treated me throughout my life.

Sorry, but I meant no offense by it, only I should probably try and grow better at using symbolism to my advantage in writing.

EDIT:
Almost forgot, the whole rant was aimed at the phrase "Girls are delicate flowers" phrase, so not at girls IN GENERAL, just at the phrase.
 

Icehearted

New member
Jul 14, 2009
2,081
0
0
Shamanic Rhythm said:
Icehearted said:
I was speaking with a woman about the impressions each sex has of the other, referring to a conversation I overheard where three women were talking about the coffee shop where they worked at, and being afraid to close up after dark. I live in a fairly innocuous neighborhood, but grew up in a violent city, so I was conflicted. Basically, the conversation was three women deciding that pretty much all men were out to rape them at any given moment, and being women, they were under constant threat by men, and they were helpless in the likely event they would be raped.

To my companion, I suggested that the perception that all men are rape-monsters with potentially lethal amounts of lust boiling inside us all was silly, offensive, and unfair. She agreed, but said it was a societally formed discrimination. For a man to approach a woman in a place that is not designated for doing so (such places being parties, nightclubs, etc) he is going to be perceived as a threat. A woman walking alone at night will do her best to avoid men. She admitted it was totally sexist, and offered nothing more as far as to how this perception could be averted.

Therein lies the point. This is sexism, this is discrimination, and it's tolerated by too many people. There isn't much men can do, we've been openly emasculated in most forms of media for decades, and this will likely never end because too many people are either totally for it or just plain apathetic.

Used to be people understood what flirting was, these days it seems everything is considered flirting, and it's up to men to figure out when they mean it or they do not. She smiles at you, she's not flirting, she just smiled at you, or maybe she's flirting? How would we know? What are we to do? How can we even say hello without getting maced for secretly being rape-monsters?

Rhetorical questions, there are no answers.
I think you're conflating a few issues here. Women have every right to be concerned about being approached in a situation they're not comfortable with. To suggest though that that logic of 'all men are rapists' carries over into the dating world is a bit much. If you politely approach a woman in a socially acceptable fashion, no one's going to begrudge you. Except possibly any husband or boyfriend she has hanging around.
I don't really see how, though I may be a bit less inhibited about calling out what's become the norm. I agree, it's every woman's right to be concerned, but this concern is often exaggerated. Let's not kid ourselves; "I don't kiss on the first date", "No sex until I'm ready", and "It's too soon" are phrases women have used far more than men. Often these things are said even when the issue hasn't been broached by the male half of the party. My point is really that there are intrinsic disparities between the sexes that favor the "men are dogs/ women have every right" statements we see generally at play.

I will give an example, but it's a bit off topic, though it punctuates things pretty well. Generally, if a man does anything to harm a woman sexually, in a way that inflicts pain, it's regarded as monstrous. Reverse that, and it's a comedic nut-shot.

Sexism plays a large role in western culture, and it's largely slanted against men now. Watch most commercials and women have it together while men are buffoons. Someone doing a dumb stunt, it's men, while women just roll their eyes. There was even a Jack in the Box commercial that had two grown men in a stroller that started whining until the woman gave them food (I think they were tacos). Movies, same, "reality" tv, same, news, same. Apply this mentality to dating and we have an environment of hostility and contempt already at play long before we even manage to make eye contact for the first time.

My female friends have pretty much all agreed with me, though they're less tactful about how they phrase it. It's tough dating, hell even making friends with the opposite sex, especially if you're the male and a stranger.
 
Aug 28, 2010
78
0
0
This thread makes me sad. A big thanks to Phasmal, ohgodalex, Jimmy Sylvers and all others who has proved that sanity still exists on The Escapist forums.
 

BlindedHunter

New member
Apr 2, 2010
70
0
0
So, this is a lot to read through and I'm finding some of it really confusing since, well, I find dating really confusing, but I feel like saying a bit of my own here because of some things I have read others say:
As a guy who is rather shy, and utterly focused on not doing anything wrong, and not very experienced in dating or even being social, I've found that:
- Girls really need to start making the first move sometimes, or at least consider it. If you are attracted to a guy and he's shy to the point of being functionally asexual, maybe you should be the one to say something. (Hello, personal experience!)
- The norms should probably go "girls always have total control over the physical aspects of a date unless they explicitly mandate otherwise". Even as a guy who is not interested in getting physical contact with as many girls as possible, if I'm with someone I really like my mind is going to go to sex, and I think that's the case with the large majority of men. While I don't think girls are completely without lust or anything, that would be silly, the most socially, culturally, and decent thing would be, I believe, to let them have the lead. Though I do think they should have more of the lead than they tend to take, but that's partly just because of my own inabilities.

As far as money goes, I think every date should end with a possibly-cutesy fight over who gets to pay.
 

Death God

New member
Jul 6, 2010
1,754
0
0
I partially think it is due to the fact that women take it for granted now that the guy does the asking. Would be nice if it was the other way around but it is the world we live in and I don't see it changing any time soon.
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
Aprilgold said:
Erana said:
Aprilgold said:
I can't count how many times that is wrong with me, mainly because I see women as a rose bush, their nice and pretty, romantic, sometimes even flutter in the wind, but try and grab them and you get your hand cut up. Very rarely will you find one that is nicer then the rest and will let itself into your grasp.

Overall, as you can tell, I really don't think their delicate, many times they backstab both friends, family, and many others over petty things, then get away Scot free.
You know what your problem is?

You think women are a "They."

That they're somehow different than you.
Women just have a hole where your hanger is, and all the other differences come down to social differences. You know, the same sorts of things that makes you, as an individual, different from the person your great great grandfather was.

Your bad relationship experience isn't that women are all cold and heartless but attractive things that hate you.
Unless you're being forced into marriage or something, bad relationships are because of your problems.

If you've been in a shitty relationship in the past, then fine. Acknowledge what you did to get yourself into this mess, realise that the cruelties of your partner are specific to that individual woman, and we'd be happy to help.
I mean, if its really extreme, like people who seem so damn perfect and manipulate their partner into a position of vulnerability, (like with child custody or citizenship status) sometimes it isn't really the individual's fault. Even then, though, I expect the victim to not then proceed to proclaim that all people of the opposite sex are manipulative, abusive people.

But you are insisting that, because of my sex, I am a selfish, unkind person who will backstab someone given the chance just because I am female. You are insulting me. You are insulting all women, and then you're using negative reactions to prove your point to yourself.
You have a problem here, and you need to accept that its your issue, not half the human race's.
Erm, no, thats why the analogy up at the top of the speech said
"Very rarely will you find one that is nicer then the rest and will let itself into your grasp." Because like guys, some are major pricks, and some are very nice, but many are / were mean to me for many years in increasing numbers of severity. I can probably reword the top of the phrase for it to make more sense, but, again, I see it as a rose among a rosebush sort of deal, but thats my personal view. Hell, what is my first sentence of me quoting that person.
"I can't count how many times that is wrong with me" Read that a few times, it says WITH ME, and this thread has been making sweeping generalizations the whole bloody time, why is my post anger such wrath.

Again, I could reword that better, but, once again its a personal view of mine, and I may be a ass for saying it, but a lot of my friends do so much for each of their gals and never gets a single thank you from them, and many times they lie and say their going to leave him if he doesn't do X thing, they have done some very extreme thing for each of their chicks, but don't get much thanks for any of it. Madam, I'm not insulting women, Roses are symbolic for being both pretty and bright, however, the stem is covered in thorns, this basically is symbolic for basically standing for that their pretty, bright *smart* but can be hard to grasp *fall in love with / be mean* this is not a insult, as it is very symbolic of how women have treated me throughout my life.

Sorry, but I meant no offense by it, only I should probably try and grow better at using symbolism to my advantage in writing.
Let me quote you here" Overall, as you can tell, I really don't think their delicate, many times they backstab both friends, family, and many others over petty things, then get away Scot free."
I'd say that's pretty damn negative a thing to say about women.

And while we're being literary snobs, its "They're" and you're missing a conjunction. I know very well what you're trying to say here, and that meaning is part of what I have issue with.
Women are people, and if you have a problem with the social interactions you're involved in, do something about it for Christ's sake. Go find new friends, try looking elsewhere for people to go out with, actively work on your social skills. You're an American male, and from the sounds of it, an American male not of any minority that would incur discrimination and hate crimes. Take advantage of that.
Yeah, people can be jerks, but after a certain point, you can't go blaming everyone else for the way you're treated. Women don't just fall in love willy-nilly because some men were just born "right" while others were born "wrong." You need to make yourself desireable to the kind of woman who will respect who you are, as a friend and partner, and keep looking for those kind of women until you find one who is looking for a relationship.

Yeah, you're blatantly bitter, but for God's sake, at least take it out on the people who actually did something instead of all women.

If your friends really are such good boyfriends who aren't getting any reciprocation for their kindness, then that is their fault. They need to stop being carpets and find partners who will respect them.

Just saying, "For me" doesn't alleviate your post of all that's going on in here, especially when you do not distinguish a difference between your personal experience and the issue of gender equality, which is universal.
 

gallaetha_matt

New member
Feb 28, 2010
438
0
0
Just kill a bear in front of her, it's easy. The bear can even be in on it if he's a good enough actor.

By bear I mean the animal, not a hairy gay guy. You do not want to mix those two up, you might be exacerbating your problems if you do.
 

McGuinty1

New member
Oct 30, 2010
134
0
0
Aprilgold said:
OP is PROBABLY not the best person to start this thread, but from what I can figure out, hes asking why does *in a sense* does a guy do all the work, all the surprising while the women just sits there judging each attempt? I'll quote myself for a second.

" I see women as a rose bush, their nice and pretty, romantic, sometimes even flutter in the wind, but try and grab them and you get your hand cut up. Very rarely will you find one that is nicer then the rest and will let itself into your grasp."

And Men DO have rights, not all guys are horrible monsters and not everyone in the gender should be treated like their horrible monsters.

Anyways, could you answer the OPs question from what I got out of it?
Fair enough. I guess I was mainly responding to this particular quote from the OP:

Riku said:
This date, although you've done all the hard work...she's still in control, she's always in control. She controls if and when you get to touch her, kiss her, walk her up to her door and maybe get invited in.
This, combined with his caveat about sweeping generalizations drawn from his own admittedly limited experience and knowledge, made my carefully calibrated horseshit-meter spike into the red. What the OP is really asking, though I am 100% sure he doesn't know it himself, is why the traditional gender roles forced on him since birth, place such an apparent outsize financial and emotional burden on him (and by extension, most men) during courtship. However, he selfishly fails to consider that those same roles place an equal, if not much larger burden on women in the form of body image, behaviour, social acceptance, and even that same "control" that frustrates him so. Does he think that women enjoy having to fight off the unwanted advances of some horny dude who they're trying to get to know as a person?

Therein lies the big problem with the OP: he has asked some perfectly valid questions that have important implications regarding traditional gender roles and their place in modern society, but it seems like he is asking them for all the wrong reasons. Just look at the thread title: it's "Dating norms need to change", not "Girls need to start asking ME out and paying for MY dinner once in a while". Societal pressures are the culprit, and both women and men are victims of circumstance and history.

Oh, and of course men have rights, more than they know what to do with, but there is a whole group of middle class white dudes who think that feminists and minorities are out to get them and want to dominate them and infringe on all those rights. You will find many of them on Reddit at r/MensRights, and they seem to be some of the worst people on the face of the earth. I have personally witnessed some of them saying that the female victims of a multiple murder perpetrated by some other middle-class white prick, had it coming to them for oppressing the guy, if not just outright cheering on the spilling of feminist blood.

They also use the term "femi-nazi" completely unironically.
 

khantron

New member
Jul 10, 2010
37
0
0
This thread is indication that nerd culture may have a bit of a misogyny problem. Especially the rapey original post. But It's good that there have been a number of people who called him out.
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
BlindedHunter said:
So, this is a lot to read through and I'm finding some of it really confusing since, well, I find dating really confusing, but I feel like saying a bit of my own here because of some things I have read others say:
As a guy who is rather shy, and utterly focused on not doing anything wrong, and not very experienced in dating or even being social, I've found that:
- Girls really need to start making the first move sometimes, or at least consider it. If you are attracted to a guy and he's shy to the point of being functionally asexual, maybe you should be the one to say something. (Hello, personal experience!)
- The norms should probably go "girls always have total control over the physical aspects of a date unless they explicitly mandate otherwise". Even as a guy who is not interested in getting physical contact with as many girls as possible, if I'm with someone I really like my mind is going to go to sex, and I think that's the case with the large majority of men. While I don't think girls are completely without lust or anything, that would be silly, the most socially, culturally, and decent thing would be, I believe, to let them have the lead. Though I do think they should have more of the lead than they tend to take, but that's partly just because of my own inabilities.

As far as money goes, I think every date should end with a possibly-cutesy fight over who gets to pay.
Please don't use the phrase, "functionally asexual." It just confuses the matter on what actual asexuality is.

Still, though, women shouldn't just have control over the physical relations on a date. Men should be given the same level of respect on the matter as women. I feel like there is this social pressure forced upon men where they have to want as much sex as possible, and this really shouldn't be. A man should have just as much a right to say no and people should respect whenever they do so out of even the slightest bit of discomfort.
Not to imply that you were saying that men shouldn't have this privilege, I just feel like when these sorts of things are being discussed, its something that should be said just to put it out there because it isn't said enough.

Still, its tough to lead with shy people in general, but with shy guys, there's not much of a social precedent for it, so I expect a lot of women would be afraid of being too pushy, with the lack of general use, subtle male signals for being uncomfortable in a romantic situation.
So to the shy guys: be clear on what you do and do not like, and try to not express it too personally. Say matter-of-factly, "I have a fear of heights," when they suggest a roller coaster, rather than, "please don't take me there."
Directing a social situation with a male is something a woman is socially discouraged from, so you have to give her the confidence to do so. And don't feel pressured to disagree or say no- if she's an emotionally healthy individual, this would come as a good sign, because she knows she isn't walking all over you.

I do feel for the shy guy- a lot of my male friends are quiet. And at the notion of dating one of them, this the biggest thing that I would want them to contribute to make me able to be my best for them on a date.
Except that I, personally, am a bit boring and would make a terrible date lead unless they liked museums. :p
 

aidutcher

New member
Dec 11, 2010
44
0
0
Icehearted said:
I was speaking with a woman about the impressions each sex has of the other, referring to a conversation I overheard where three women were talking about the coffee shop where they worked at, and being afraid to close up after dark. I live in a fairly innocuous neighborhood, but grew up in a violent city, so I was conflicted. Basically, the conversation was three women deciding that pretty much all men were out to rape them at any given moment, and being women, they were under constant threat by men, and they were helpless in the likely event they would be raped.

To my companion, I suggested that the perception that all men are rape-monsters with potentially lethal amounts of lust boiling inside us all was silly, offensive, and unfair. She agreed, but said it was a societally formed discrimination. For a man to approach a woman in a place that is not designated for doing so (such places being parties, nightclubs, etc) he is going to be perceived as a threat. A woman walking alone at night will do her best to avoid men. She admitted it was totally sexist, and offered nothing more as far as to how this perception could be averted.

Therein lies the point. This is sexism, this is discrimination, and it's tolerated by too many people. There isn't much men can do, we've been openly emasculated in most forms of media for decades, and this will likely never end because too many people are either totally for it or just plain apathetic.

Used to be people understood what flirting was, these days it seems everything is considered flirting, and it's up to men to figure out when they mean it or they do not. She smiles at you, she's not flirting, she just smiled at you, or maybe she's flirting? How would we know? What are we to do? How can we even say hello without getting maced for secretly being rape-monsters?

Rhetorical questions, there are no answers.
I actually found this to be quite helpful in answering questions like the ones you posed:
http://kateharding.net/2009/10/08/guest-blogger-starling-schrodinger%E2%80%99s-rapist-or-a-guy%E2%80%99s-guide-to-approaching-strange-women-without-being-maced/
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
I disagree. The roles are known, yeah they kinda suck, but they are known. Also, no one freaks out when it happens in the other direction, so I don't really see any reason that anything needs to change. Sure it would be nice if there was a little more equality, but I don't see it as a problem as long as it's ok for it to happen the other way around, and in my experience it's fine when it does.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
Phasmal said:
Women are usually `in control` like that because if a dude was it'd be a hand up the shirt before he said hi.

just kidding.

OT: Meh i've seen it happen both ways to be honest, it might still lean just a tad bit more to girls waiting for guys to make the first move, but it's getting much more even than it was 10,20,30 years ago, however just be yourself (well, a semi-confident version of yourself, that shows your proud of who you are and that your perfectly happy being right there in the moment with that special someone.) and if things don't work out, then just gotta wait for the next pretty lass you have might have a connection with comes along.

oh and if you haven't noticed OP, traditions..well, they are a fickle thing sometimes, pretty hard to break in a fast and appropriate manner =\