That was actually my first thought, sadly. Couldn't help but think, "Dear God those things look like someone modeled them after the fakest breasts I've ever seen."D Moness said:I agree it looks like it has breast implants. It looks too unnatural
I know the irony complaining about silicone in a torso statue.
And it scares me a little more that this was essentially my very next thought.Rawne1980 said:That is just downright disgraceful.
That is the most disturbing thing i've ever seen.
I mean, what woman in her right mind would wear a Union Jack bikini?
I know us English folk usually feel like tits but come on.
I'm afraid you have a very serious case of a sense of humour.Vigormortis said:Da hell's wrong with me?
No cure? Dear lord, tell me there's at least a treatment? Some pill regimen I can start on. Perhaps a medicated patch or weekly injection? Something. Anything!Rawne1980 said:I'm afraid you have a very serious case of a sense of humour.Vigormortis said:Da hell's wrong with me?
It is a very dire illness not tolerated on these boards by the more serious types who take offense whenever you have an attack of the funny.
There is no cure.
The only thing you can do is join the rest if of us poorly folk and giggle at the pointless things people fly into a rage over.
uhhh, how do they know the legs are severed? they're below the bottom of the statue!RPS said:A statuette of a woman?s bikinied torso, with her head, arms and legs crudely severed.
I suppose a daily dose of The Only Way is Essex or Jersey Shore will be enough to block any oncoming attacks of humour you may feel building up.Vigormortis said:No cure? Dear lord, tell me there's at least a treatment? Some pill regimen I can start on. Perhaps a medicated patch or weekly injection? Something. Anything!
I'd hate to be labeled as a "leper" around here.
[sub]though, with some of the opinions I hold, it may be too late already.[/sub]
Oh hell....the only treatment involves watching brain-numbing drivel like Jersey Shore?Rawne1980 said:I suppose a daily dose of The Only Way is Essex or Jersey Shore will be enough to block any oncoming attacks of humour you may feel building up.
The only other way is to surrender to it, give in to the funny side.
Find an incredibly serious thread, preferably one on sexism, gun control or any random gender wars thread that pops up and stick humorous comments in them.
People won't get that it's supposed to be a funny and take it seriously. Usually this results in even more hilarity and should keep you going for at least a few hours.
Rawne1980 said:...attack of the funny...
...giggle...
...oncoming attacks of humour...
...give in to the funny side...
... even more hilarity...
What did I say would happen? I said you'd sneer at anything I had to say. Your response is to sneer at an EXTREME point form response. No "elaborate on that", no "I disagree because X, Y and Z", just straight up "You're wrong!", with the ever popular "cop out" rebuttal. Dude, I could present you with a 50 page THESIS signed by leading scientific minds, and you would call me wrong. This was the whole point of my "we're not going to agree on this issue, why bother discussing it" entreaty. Which I am now repeating for a 2nd time.Abandon4093 said:That's a major cop out. "No, because I say so."
Well it's about time everyone made an "any publicity is good publicity" argument. It ain't true, otherwise Jim'll Fix It DVD sales would be going through the roof right now. I don't know if they foresaw a controversy and aimed to create one for publicity sake, but it's only going to backfire now that members of the public are going to be discouraged from buying it by their disgusted, complaining peers. If they weren't aiming for controversy, it demonstrates an advertising department that's out of touch with shifting video game sexual politics.Sansha said:It does make it okay because they're a business. They're not here to make everyone happy. It's in their best interest to stand out and appeal to their majority audience because that's how the system works. Dead Island had a small fanbase and was mediocre at best, but popular enough to warrant a sequel, so they had to do something to garner attention, and you're more than doing their job for them. Even if they don't ship it with the torso, they've all the free press from the internet they need.maninahat said:I'm well aware of the financial reasons to do it, but that doesn't make it okay. The industry has been gradually trying to distance itself from sexual advertising, and attempting to show a greater awareness of the increasing number of female gamers. "Sex sells" is still a predominant marketing trick, but there is a trend to see overt, gratuitous sex as tacky and dated. The Lynx/Axe deodorant adverts, for instance, feel very 90s.Sansha said:Welcome to Business Marketing 401.maninahat said:The game designers didn't factor female gamers into consideration when designing either game, and were only interested in serving the majority at the expense of everyone else.
I'm all for the decline of sexism and the greater appeal to female gamers. I like how female characters are being de-sexualized and the industry is generally becoming less sexist.
But I don't see how this figurine is sexist, I really truly don't. It's not sexually appealing in any logical manner and I think people are over-blowing the whole 'violence against women' thing, because the game's content features all kinds of folks getting fucking butchered.
It's what violence is.
I've never, in my entire life, been discouraged from handing somebody some money because my 'peers' are disgusted and/or complaining. If such a thing were true, pornography wouldn't be a billion-dollar market. I don't let other people's opinions sway my own or my decisions, because what other people think shouldn't factor in to what you do with your time and money.maninahat said:Well it's about time everyone made an "any publicity is good publicity" argument. It ain't true, otherwise Jim'll Fix It DVD sales would be going through the roof right now. I don't know if they foresaw a controversy and aimed to create one for publicity sake, but it's only going to backfire now that members of the public are going to be discouraged from buying it by their disgusted, complaining peers. If they weren't aiming for controversy, it demonstrates an advertising department that's out of touch with shifting video game sexual politics.Sansha said:It does make it okay because they're a business. They're not here to make everyone happy. It's in their best interest to stand out and appeal to their majority audience because that's how the system works. Dead Island had a small fanbase and was mediocre at best, but popular enough to warrant a sequel, so they had to do something to garner attention, and you're more than doing their job for them. Even if they don't ship it with the torso, they've all the free press from the internet they need.maninahat said:I'm well aware of the financial reasons to do it, but that doesn't make it okay. The industry has been gradually trying to distance itself from sexual advertising, and attempting to show a greater awareness of the increasing number of female gamers. "Sex sells" is still a predominant marketing trick, but there is a trend to see overt, gratuitous sex as tacky and dated. The Lynx/Axe deodorant adverts, for instance, feel very 90s.Sansha said:Welcome to Business Marketing 401.maninahat said:The game designers didn't factor female gamers into consideration when designing either game, and were only interested in serving the majority at the expense of everyone else.
I'm all for the decline of sexism and the greater appeal to female gamers. I like how female characters are being de-sexualized and the industry is generally becoming less sexist.
But I don't see how this figurine is sexist, I really truly don't. It's not sexually appealing in any logical manner and I think people are over-blowing the whole 'violence against women' thing, because the game's content features all kinds of folks getting fucking butchered.
It's what violence is.
Oh! OH!Rawne1980 said:I'm afraid you have a very serious case of a sense of humour.Vigormortis said:Da hell's wrong with me?
It is a very dire illness not tolerated on these boards by the more serious types who take offense whenever you have an attack of the funny.
There is no cure.
The only thing you can do is join the rest if of us poorly folk and giggle at the pointless things people fly into a rage over.