Depolarizing the Sexist Debate: Idle Thumbs and Girlfriend Mode on Borderlands 2

Recommended Videos

Overusedname

Emcee: the videogame video guy
Jun 26, 2012
950
0
0
Signa said:
So, roughly how many girls is that? I don't see anything you said changing anything I said. I know girls play games, but is it common? My roommate is constantly hanging out online with a chick from Canada (we're in Seattle), and they are going to meet up at PAX. She even hopped into our game of Terraria once. I know girl gamers exist.

Tell you what, go on Facebook, and find all the girls that are you friends with, and possibly girls that are friends of friends, and tell me how many you know to or see making positive comments about gaming, or someone they know playing games. Tally them and post the results back.
Okay, I just ran through it all. 14 out of 22 women I know on Facebook play non-casual games. And all the rest appreciate it as an art and don't look down on it at all. (I only have 60 facebook friends total, I keep it down to people I actually talk to.)

I've said this once elsewhere on the forums, but I guess I'll say it again: My ex grew up on Zelda and Mario. One of my best friends is the biggest Final fantasy fan I've ever met. And yes, she lacks a y chromosome. My best friend's girlfriend makes art for the game we're designing. I was introduced to gaming by my Nanny and her daughter when I was but a wee one.

...It's a matter of who ya meet. And the fact that girls get thrown some obnoxious crap for being gamers sometimes. Very often, actually.

I can understand your doubt. Again, it's about who you happen to come across. I often find myself surprised by how many people say what you're saying. The statistics say a huge portion of gamers are female, and while many question 47%, I think it's utterly impossible for it to be less than 35% in my experience. Almost alf the gamers I know are girls, now that I think about it. In life anyway, Steam is a sausagefest with 3-4 exceptions.

I don't think it's rare at all. But they can be discouraged from being open about it. Hopefully in this age were men walk around with Rainbow Dash keychains, gender norms will continue to melt away.
 

Lieju

New member
Jan 4, 2009
3,044
0
0
Signa said:
Saying dumb things is different than telling an offensive joke. I laugh at dead baby jokes, but the are admittedly tasteless. I understand anyone calling someone an idiot for telling those jokes, but it should be up to the recipient to just ignore them instead of critiquing them. Now if we're talking about creationist theory, that's another matter entirely.
Sometimes ignoring things is the best option, true. Especially when we are talking about dead baby jokes or other things that are meant to be offending.
Then complaining that it's offensive is a moot point, that's the point of it.
But I'm talking more about instances where the person telling the joke doesn't necessarily understand it's offensive. And of course it should be ok to criticise the context of the joke, for example if those dead baby jokes were really out of place with the rest of the tone of the game/movie/etc, or in something aimed at children, for example.

Signa said:
You're a girl, right? Tell me how you think that culture has expressed that you shouldn't enjoy yourself because you have boobs? Gaming can be an universal unifier. People love to have fun and compete, sometimes in a cooperative setting. I say "people" because I mean everyone. Yet women around me don't have that interest. There's a few that do, and I fully commend them, but I've have friends who's wives will leave the room and go do her own thing not because it's "guy time" but because she doesn't give a damn about the things we find fun. This saddens me, yet it's their choices that have formed my opinion on this matter.
Well, I come from a different culture than you, presumably, and among other things got bullied at school for liking video-games and the colour blue (because those are boy-things), but looking at video-games themselves, which is a cultural aspect we mostly share, there's less female protagonists, the design of the female characters is often sillier (even if you have some choice in designing your character, the boobs for example are huge, and the outfits skimpy.)...
Not to mention, if there's not many female gamers, people automatically think gaming is a guy-thing, so girls and women assume that as well, and conform to the expectations, without even thinking about it. Groups we hang out in reinforce our behaviour. For example, a group of boys and a group of girls hang out. The boys play video-games, because that's just something you do. So even the boys naturally get involved in the games.

There's also the image of childishness that's still attached to video-games.
When people say a video-game is 'mature', they will probably mean it has boobs and guns. Which isn't exactly that mature. But culture might be more inclined to allow men to be childish like that, and cater to that demographic.
I don't know how representative of women in general this is, but looking at the people I grew up with, both girls and boys played video-games. But at some point girls started to consider them childish, and moved to other things.



Signa said:
Bah, fuck Chell. Chell is a blank slate that doesn't do anything for either gender.
That was my point. Chell's gender doesn't matter, at all. She just happens to be female. But way too often the asumption is that making a character male is the neutral thing to do, so characters whose gender doesn't matter tend to end up male.

Signa said:
The only counterpoint I can make is the characters needs to be part of the setting of the game, and forcing females into those settings might not work right. I'm talking about competitive (using the word loosely here) games like TF2, CoD, or Tribes: Ascend. Every one of those games features a setting involving waring factions that women likely wouldn't be a part of, and if they were, probably would end up as targets for looking different and standing out.
I don't play those kinds of games much, but looking at TF2 characters, for example, it's not like they went for realism there. Many games don't, and there are female soldiers as well.
 

Skipper zammo

New member
Oct 11, 2011
88
0
0
ElPatron said:
This might be because of cultural issues, but the "Girlfriend mode" doesn't strike me as sexism.

I am not sure where we picked this up but it's common to describe a partner or just someone who tags along as a "girlfriend" when you're providing help/cover in a game, "riding shotgun" etc. Mind that this is used mainly on guys, like the "prison girlfriend" thing.

Skipper zammo said:
No I think he means fellatio. As in why is there an irrational fear of putting your dick into an vagina with teeth when most guys are pretty into the idea of putting their dick into a mouth when those usually has teeth.

At least that how I understood it.
Vaginas with teeth? It's horrible and uncanny and nobody wants an ugly monster ripping their junk off - it's not so irrational. After all, human faces don't look like monsters when performing fellatio.

Personally, now that I think of it, vaginas with teeth sound hot.
Well it's an irrational fear because it doesn't exist. Like being afraid to leave your house because of minotaur's is an irrational fear. Yes minotaur's are 10ft tall monsters with the heads of bulls that could tear you limb from limb. But there aren't any so being afraid of them is rather irrational.
 

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
Skipper zammo said:
Well it's an irrational fear because it doesn't exist. Like being afraid to leave your house because of minotaur's is an irrational fear. Yes minotaur's are 10ft tall monsters with the heads of balls that could tear you limb from limb. But there aren't any so being afraid of them is rather irrational.
So being scared/disturbed by any horror videogame or movie is irrational, because it's not real, right?

An irrational fear is like thinking that a .22LR AR15-style rifle is deadlier than the Mini-14 even though the Mini fires the strongest cartdridge. Or thinking that putting flame decals and a spoiler on a Fiat Uno will make it faster than a BMW. It just doesn't add up.

I'm sorry, but we are humans. We have sewn people together, turn men into women and even implanted fake teeth on people who had lost them. Vaginas with teeth are pretty rational - you're using your brain to construct something that is uncanny but at the same time believable.
 

Skipper zammo

New member
Oct 11, 2011
88
0
0
ElPatron said:
Skipper zammo said:
Well it's an irrational fear because it doesn't exist. Like being afraid to leave your house because of minotaur's is an irrational fear. Yes minotaur's are 10ft tall monsters with the heads of balls that could tear you limb from limb. But there aren't any so being afraid of them is rather irrational.
So being scared/disturbed by any horror videogame or movie is irrational, because it's not real, right?

An irrational fear is like thinking that a .22LR AR15-style rifle is deadlier than the Mini-14 even though the Mini fires the strongest cartdridge. Or thinking that putting flame decals and a spoiler on a Fiat Uno will make it faster than a BMW. It just doesn't add up.

I'm sorry, but we are humans. We have sewn people together, turn men into women and even implanted fake teeth on people who had lost them. Vaginas with teeth are pretty rational - you're using your brain to construct something that is uncanny but at the same time believable.
Neither of those examples are fears, they are mistakes. No one is going to be afraid of one rifle over the other when it's being pointed at them. They're all boom sticks in the end, they all shoot hot bits of metal at you very fast. And anyone that see's a Fiat Uno with flames on the side is most likely to just call the person driving it a twat under their breath and move on.

But yeah, I suppose it's possibly we could surgically add teeth to a vagina. But as far as I know it's never happened. So yes I consider that an irrational fear. There is nothing wrong with having irrational fears (I myself am deathly afraid of moths), but if you are afraid of something that has zero chance of actually causing you and kind of harm you are being irrational.
 

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
Skipper zammo said:
Neither of those examples are fears, they are mistakes. No one is going to be afraid of one rifle over the other
No, there are people who will scream and cry about a rifle even if it's unloaded and nobody is touching it. Assault Weapons Ban anyone? That wasn't a mistake. That was irrational fear.

Same thing with switchblades, balisongs and ballistic knives. In the US you can atually own a AOW that shoots a knife with gunpowder, but you can't own a spring powered knife like the Spetsnaz used.

Why? Because fear of the Italian mob, fear of the Asian gangs and fear of Communism.

Skipper zammo said:
But yeah, I suppose it's possibly we could surgically add teeth to a vagina. But as far as I know it's never happened. So yes I consider that an irrational fear.
No. An irrational fear is disproportional to the actual danger posed.

I.E. If you get scared by a dog when it runs at you at night, it's not irrational because you might not see the kind of dog that might be attacking. Fearing a Chihuahua is irrational. Fearing the "unknown" isn't. Teeth around vagina = unknown.

Skipper zammo said:
but if you are afraid of something that has zero chance of actually causing you and kind of harm you are being irrational.
This is correct, though.