Deserters Will Be Shot

Recommended Videos

TotalerKrieger

New member
Nov 12, 2011
376
0
0
God, how I hate the opening scene of Enemy of the Gates for its unashamed historical inaccuracy (the rest of the movie is just stupid Hollywood fluff). It has seemingly managed to skew Western audience's overall perception of the entire Eastern front.

Take the "one man gets a rifle, the other a 5-round stripper clip" trope...in 1942, the Soviets had more Mosin Nagant rifles available than men on the frontlines to use them. Even rear-echelon troops were given the comparative luxury of a handier M38 carbine. It is pure Hollywood fiction that the Soviets commonly had issues with arming men fighting on the front lines. The ONLY Soviet soldiers ever sent into battle unarmed were the poor bastards sent to the penal battalions.

The opening scene of Enemy at the Gates is just openly offensive to all those old Russian veterans. According to Hollywood, Russians are so cowardly that they need to be locked into their transport trains, will abandon ship at the first sign of danger and are stupid enough to organize a frontal charge against tanks, entrenched infantry and MG emplacements along a narrow urban corridor, where half the attackers are unarmed.

...The Russians fighting at Stalingrad were not fighting for Stalin or some ideology, they were fighting for each other, their country and their families...like any soldier. The opening scene was the equivalent of Speilberg's Saving Private Ryan depicting a bunch of US infantrymen cowardly abandoning the fight on the approach to Omaha beach.

While I would put the NKVD on a similar level of barbarism as Germany's SS, the depiction of indiscriminate executions by Commissars in the middle of a firefight and a NKVD barrier unit positioned on the frontline to gun down retreating troops is not based in any recorded historical fact. The NKVD butchers killed thousands upon thousands of their own, but it wasn't commonly done on the battlefield, it was done out of sight to avoid damaging unit morale.

During the initial German advances in Stalingrad: August 1 - October 15, 1942
140,775 servicemen were detained
3,980 were arrested
1,189 were executed by shooting
2,961 were sent to Penal battalions

97% of those detained for retreating or similar behaviour were sent back to the front without any punishment. It takes combat veterans to win battles, you don't build up a core of senior NCOs by executing an entire unit after every failed attack.

Overall, Enemy at the Gates was about as concerned with accuracy as The Patriot (the one where British troops murder an entire town by burning them alive in a church...an atrocity that was actually carried out by the Nazis...). Most of the time, Hollywood and history are like oil and water.

TLDR: Fuck Enemy at the Gates and the people who made this movie.
 

Xan Krieger

Completely insane
Feb 11, 2009
2,918
0
0
Fieldy409 said:
Bob_McMillan said:
It's not like they are traitors or anything.
Leaving your fellow soldiers with one less guy at their back that they were counting on is treachery to me.

Besides with the Russians it was the 'fear us more than the enemy' mentality of keeping discipline.
Basically this, in a more modern form see Warhammer 40,000's imperial guard. If they refuse to do their jobs they are making things harder for everyone else and that can not be allowed to happen during war so by all means execute them. In war the only direction to advance is towards the enemy.
 

megaflash

New member
May 28, 2014
26
0
0
The cultural context (and western skewing) of the event has been explained far better than I can. However, I am of two minds on the action of Deserting.

On one hand, deserting is a serious dereliction of duty. When you are on the field, you need to KNOW that your squad mates have your back. That's why soldiers are trained, both mentally and psychically.

On the other hand, not everyone can "do the combat". They are kind of stuck in the military, but could get a position that's more of a support role.

As for the execution of deserters, pretty sure that doesn't happen anymore.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
Order No. 227 was dropped in October, 1942. The Russian counterattack across the Volga and the encirclement of the German 6th Army during Operation Uranus started in November 1942. The use of blocking troops during Enemy At the Gates is anachronistic.
 

Sansha

There's a principle in business
Nov 16, 2008
1,726
0
0
Kopikatsu said:
It's meant to keep people from deserting. Deserting is a treasonous act, so they are traitors. Plus, if they get picked up by the enemy, they could very well tell them where your encampments are, when supply shipments come, what your numbers are, and so on.
This exactly. It's not a matter of punishment, it's safety. If you're frightened enough to run away from your countrymen, you're definitely not going to have the mental fortitude to resist when you get captured and probed for information.
 

J Tyran

New member
Dec 15, 2011
2,407
0
0
inu-kun said:
J Tyran said:
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
briankoontz said:
That was quite the politically correct ramble there. The problem is that basically of that is far left spoon fed political nonsense. Especially the part of demonizing terrorists. I'm sorry but these people demonize them selves, mutilating women, forcing children to fight, murdering anyone who is disagrees with them in the most brutal inhumane ways. Then you go on and demonize the military branches of the western world, who are the ones who serve willingly to protect the right for you to say what you did.
Islamic terrorists like IS and Boko Haram are not nice people but don't go trying to kid anyone with half a brain that Western soldiers are "protecting our rights", thats naive. Almost childishly so, the military just act to enforce their nations foreign policy. For whatever that entails, economic protectionism, geopolitical strategy and a variety of other reasons that have little or nothing to do with "FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!".

They are mercenaries, they join the military for pay, opportunity and training and get sold on the "heroes" mentality so many do not even realise it.
I can say the same about your opinion that "soldiers are evil" is childish, there will always be bullies but the vast majority of those in the army are sane with morals who do want to do good.
Considering I never said soldiers were "evil" this is a pretty poor attempt, I just said they are mercenaries enacting a governments foreign policy whilst often being deluded into not realising it. After misrepresenting my statement you try to call me childish? This from someone that believes in "good vs evil"? "Good guys" and "bad guys"?

Really?
 

Dalisclock

Making lemons combustible again
Legacy
Escapist +
Feb 9, 2008
11,286
7,086
118
A Barrel In the Marketplace
Country
Eagleland
Gender
Male
Bob_McMillan said:
Why though? Does the army or navy or boy scouts have nothing better to do? I was watching Enemy at the Gates, and yeah for the first five minutes all they did was waste ammunition on a couple of poor guys trying to swim through freezing water. It's not like they are traitors or anything.
It sets bad precedent to let people just run away from the army during battle. Let people get away with it and everyone else realizes they can just refuse to fight. Especially in a situation when a lot of your troops were conscripted and had no choice if they wanted to be there or not.

That being said, most countries don't actually execute deserters(the last US execution for desertion was in 1945). Kicking people out of the military on a dishonorable discharge and/or sending them to prison is more common.

As far as Enemy at the Gates is concerned, the Soviets were very brutal in this regard. Their homeland was under invasion and they took Stalin's Order of "Not one step backward" pretty literally, to my understanding. Also, Soviet soldiers who were taken prisoner by the Germans and later rescued would be sent to Gulags(which are basically concentration camps)for the rest of their lives, so yeah.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
J Tyran said:
They say that god is supposedly beyond good and evil. Well, the jury's still out on that, but one thing is for certain: Humans aren't. It's naive to categorize every human being in a black-and-white perspective, but it's crazy to think that just because the world isn't black and white that those two colors do not exist. Some people are describing the motivations of governments lately as a black-and-grey morality. There are people who do bad shit, and they enjoy it. Some of them are soldiers. It happens.
 

Cartographer

New member
Jun 1, 2009
212
0
0
FalloutJack said:
J Tyran said:
They say that god is supposedly beyond good and evil. Well, the jury's still out on that, but one thing is for certain: Humans aren't. It's naive to categorize every human being in a black-and-white perspective, but it's crazy to think that just because the world isn't black and white that those two colors do not exist. Some people are describing the motivations of governments lately as a black-and-grey morality. There are people who do bad shit, and they enjoy it. Some of them are soldiers. It happens.
Good and Evil are human constructs.
No one wakes up to think of themselves as the "bad guy".
The Good vs Evil, Us vs Them, Black-and-white crap is exactly what he was talking about when he talks about soldiers getting sold on the "heroism" of the job. Yeah, you do things you would be proud to say you have done, but only an idiot thinks they are done out of the kindness of your country's heart. As a soldier you are 100% the face of foreign policy, if your country wants you to be nice, respectful, helpful and the like you will be; if they want you to enforce a "regime change" 'cus the old regime isn't selling oil at the "right" prices, you get to do that too.
 

beastro

New member
Jan 6, 2012
564
0
0
Abbyka said:
You're basically forcing someone who may not have the guts or fortitude to handle being a soldier to BE a soldier.
Tough, it's war and the least of the many evils of it.

There's a reason why NCOs were equipped with a pike in the days of muskets - it was to prod and keep the men pushing forward.
 

J Tyran

New member
Dec 15, 2011
2,407
0
0
FalloutJack said:
J Tyran said:
They say that god is supposedly beyond good and evil. Well, the jury's still out on that, but one thing is for certain: Humans aren't. It's naive to categorize every human being in a black-and-white perspective, but it's crazy to think that just because the world isn't black and white that those two colors do not exist. Some people are describing the motivations of governments lately as a black-and-grey morality. There are people who do bad shit, and they enjoy it. Some of them are soldiers. It happens.
Morals are relative but yeah I'm not saying there are no good actions and no bad actions, I wouldn't even claim countries never send their military to good things either. Many countries send their armed forces on purely humanitarian missions, after natural disasters for example. No bullshit, no "bringing freedom" or any geopolitical agenda they just use the in place logistical capability and the trained individuals the military have to help. Like in the aftermath of the 2011 earthquake and Tsunami in Japan.

Cartographer said:
Good and Evil are human constructs.
No one wakes up to think of themselves as the "bad guy".
The Good vs Evil, Us vs Them, Black-and-white crap is exactly what he was talking about when he talks about soldiers getting sold on the "heroism" of the job. Yeah, you do things you would be proud to say you have done, but only an idiot thinks they are done out of the kindness of your country's heart. As a soldier you are 100% the face of foreign policy, if your country wants you to be nice, respectful, helpful and the like you will be; if they want you to enforce a "regime change" 'cus the old regime isn't selling oil at the "right" prices, you get to do that too.
Governments and rulers have always made the most of the "we're the good guys and they're the bad guys" idea, it's one of the reasons its so pervasive because its one of the first things in the propaganda grab bag and it always bloody works.

I'm not anti military or think less of people that join, its regular solid pay, you can pick up training and education and many valuable life skills. For those that are willing to join it can be worthwhile on those grounds alone, I can certainly see the appeal.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
beastro said:
Abbyka said:
You're basically forcing someone who may not have the guts or fortitude to handle being a soldier to BE a soldier.
Tough, it's war and the least of the many evils of it.

There's a reason why NCOs were equipped with a pike in the days of muskets - it was to prod and keep the men pushing forward.
Do you have a source for that? Certainly, that's the sort of thing NCOs would do, but a pike seems to be a very poor choice to do it with.
 

Strelok

New member
Dec 22, 2012
494
0
0
Bob_McMillan said:
Why though? Does the army or navy or boy scouts have nothing better to do? I was watching Enemy at the Gates, and yeah for the first five minutes all they did was waste ammunition on a couple of poor guys trying to swim through freezing water. It's not like they are traitors or anything.
That movie isn't any where near accurate, source, lived and worked in Russia. They made fun of it as America's vision of Russia. There was no one rifle then ammo for the next, the concept is just ridiculous, how could they have won and pushed Germany all the way back while executing their own soldiers? Enemy At The Gates or War of The Rats (book) was a work of fiction based on a real life character.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
Bob_McMillan said:
Why though? Does the army or navy or boy scouts have nothing better to do? I was watching Enemy at the Gates, and yeah for the first five minutes all they did was waste ammunition on a couple of poor guys trying to swim through freezing water. It's not like they are traitors or anything.
actually, they kinda are. Desertion has historically been considered a kind of treason. You are abandoning duty to your country. Particularly in active wartime, when deserters often seek sanctuary with the enemy in return for what information they have, desertion is regarded in similar light to treason.
 

TotalerKrieger

New member
Nov 12, 2011
376
0
0
Strelok said:
Bob_McMillan said:
Why though? Does the army or navy or boy scouts have nothing better to do? I was watching Enemy at the Gates, and yeah for the first five minutes all they did was waste ammunition on a couple of poor guys trying to swim through freezing water. It's not like they are traitors or anything.
That movie isn't any where near accurate, source, lived and worked in Russia. They made fun of it as America's vision of Russia. There was no one rifle then ammo for the next, the concept is just ridiculous, how could they have won and pushed Germany all the way back while executing their own soldiers? Enemy At The Gates or War of The Rats (book) was a work of fiction based on a real life character.
Hear, hear. Hollywood really needs to stop making historical movies that involve other countries as they seem incapable of being respectful and fair in their depiction of other nations. The vast inaccuracies and extremely biased narratives seem to be devised as a means of influencing how people perceive certain events in history. This happens far too frequently to be dismissed as isolated instances of regrettable artistic choice.

I'm surprised the British do not speak up about how frequently they are misrepresented or slandered outright by Hollywood: Bridge on the River Kwai, U-571, Braveheart, The Patriot, Micheal Collins, Patton, A Bridge Too Far, Saving Private Ryan, Band of Brothers, Monument's Men, Argo , the list goes on and on...
 

LordLundar

New member
Apr 6, 2004
962
0
0
Strelok said:
Bob_McMillan said:
Why though? Does the army or navy or boy scouts have nothing better to do? I was watching Enemy at the Gates, and yeah for the first five minutes all they did was waste ammunition on a couple of poor guys trying to swim through freezing water. It's not like they are traitors or anything.
That movie isn't any where near accurate, source, lived and worked in Russia. They made fun of it as America's vision of Russia. There was no one rifle then ammo for the next, the concept is just ridiculous, how could they have won and pushed Germany all the way back while executing their own soldiers? Enemy At The Gates or War of The Rats (book) was a work of fiction based on a real life character.
While I agree, there is an accuracy for the 'deserters will be shot' situation, and not just Soviet forces. Several military organizations over history would issue rifles to the soldiers but issue pistols to their commanding officer. The principal for this was that if a soldier would commit a treasonous act (and desertion in a combat zone does qualify) the CO would be able to draw and fire on the soldier faster than the soldier could act with the bulky rifle.
 

beastro

New member
Jan 6, 2012
564
0
0
thaluikhain said:
beastro said:
Abbyka said:
You're basically forcing someone who may not have the guts or fortitude to handle being a soldier to BE a soldier.
Tough, it's war and the least of the many evils of it.

There's a reason why NCOs were equipped with a pike in the days of muskets - it was to prod and keep the men pushing forward.
Do you have a source for that? Certainly, that's the sort of thing NCOs would do, but a pike seems to be a very poor choice to do it with.
Look up the spontoon.

It was used less actively as a weapon and more as a arm to keep men corralled and in formation as maintaining formation more than anything kept men from breaking and running, hence why cavalry charges only worked on shaken, disorganized troops - the group kept them together with bayonets pointing at the cav instead of feeling alone and the desire to break and run overtake them.
 

Armadox

Mandatory Madness!
Aug 31, 2010
1,120
0
0
I'll tell it to you like this..
I took the time to train you the secrets of my warfare..
Those secrets are the property of me, the nation or troop or whatever you belong too.
You are now carrying my property until the war is won..
You walk out with my property, well.. I can't let that get in my enemies' hands can I?
I'd rather burn it to the ground then let it leave my usefulness..
I can always train another in your place..