Yes. Sort of.Allthingsspectacular said:Did ME3 ruin Mass Effect for you?
Or as dishonestly, which is kind of the problem in the first place. Not to mention the reason I put "if" as a conditional.Capitano Segnaposto said:What do you mean "if"? It did happen, just not as bluntly as I put it.Zachary Amaranth said:Yeah, if that had actually happened they would have looked like spoiled little children.Capitano Segnaposto said:Oh, I am not saying the ending wasn't dissapointing. I was just pissed at how the community took a hold of the issue:
"WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH THE ENDING SUCKED! WE DEMAND A NEW ENDING! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH WAH WAH WAAAAAAAAAAH".
Seriously, nearly everyone sounded like a bunch of spoiled little children.
first off there's two 'literally's in you sentence and second is that adding a new a character does not take just "one line of code." It takes script rewrites so that the crew actually acknowledges the guy is a Prothean to add depth, as well as needing more voice acting, and then they gave him unique skills, you get a laser gun, plus they needed to make a new level where Shepard finds the Prothean, they needed to give him a room on the ship, plus there's his personality, cutscenes specific to the character, not to mention artwork that is needed to get everything right. That right there is a ton of work for the devolopers.Mass Effect 3, DLC is a fucking Prothean, a VERY important member of the progenitor species who has dialogue choices and obvious plot relevance. Adding the Prothean to game literally literally takes the simple editing of one line of code.
Since when did someone have to preface an opinion with "I personally think"? Of course he personally thinks that, otherwise he wouldn't be stating it. No one should take that as him trying to push it as a set-in-stone fact, as you put it. Instead, take it as his opinion, which is clearly what it is, regardless of what he may or may not have prefaced it with.The Heik said:This is a prime example of what I meant by flame war inspiring stuff. You have to learn a little bit of discretion when it comes to posting stuff, otherwise you'll just piss people off. With your original post you could have started with "I personally think" which makes it a subjective view and will be considered as such, but you decided to portray that opinion of yours as set-in-stone fact, which pretty much gives every person from here to the moon permission to dis-abuse you of such notions if they disagree. That's what starts a flame war.
I never said he had to use the phrase "I personally think", it was merely an example of a more unambiguous phrasing that he could have used.Haefulz said:Since when did someone have to preface an opinion with "I personally think"? Of course he personally thinks that, otherwise he wouldn't be stating it. No one should take that as him trying to push it as a set-in-stone fact, as you put it. Instead, take it as his opinion, which is clearly what it is, regardless of what he may or may not have prefaced it with.The Heik said:This is a prime example of what I meant by flame war inspiring stuff. You have to learn a little bit of discretion when it comes to posting stuff, otherwise you'll just piss people off. With your original post you could have started with "I personally think" which makes it a subjective view and will be considered as such, but you decided to portray that opinion of yours as set-in-stone fact, which pretty much gives every person from here to the moon permission to dis-abuse you of such notions if they disagree. That's what starts a flame war.
Judging by the overwhelming amount of people that agree with me in this thread i'm happy to take that as over reaction originally. Your opinion is just as valid as mine so why the big deal?The Heik said:snip