Jakub324 said:
Grouchy Imp said:
I'm going to reply to both of those in this space because I can't work out where else to put it. An ultra-nationalist Russia lead by people who hate the West would spend as much, if not more than the US on their Military, so yeah, it's still plausible.
I disagree with you when you say that the TF141 people were as gung-ho as the Rangers. The Rangers had a kind of "Yeah, we'll show 'em!" attitude at the beginning and "Fuck me, you bastards!" one towards the end, whereas the 141 were more "Let's do what we need to do and get out of here" all the way through. It was clear that they had a more grim mind-set than the Rangers.
To counter your first point, I kinda doubt any nation could equal the monetary might of the US. If you draw up a top 10 of military spenders in the world, not only does the US take the no.1 spot but still spends more than places 2-10
combined. Russia would not, could not, raise that kind of financial clout. Hell, I doubt even China could, and they're the strongest contenders. Plus on top of that the figures I quoted are for governmental spending only. Let's not forget that a large portion of the US public is tooled up due to the 2nd Amendment turning them into ready equipped guerrilla fighters. Bottom line? Pick any five super-nations you care to name, add them together in a coordinated military strike, and they wouldn't get off (or even to) US beaches.
Second, whilst I'll concede that the attitudes and motivations of the different squads were polar opposites, they still got involved in the same activities. If MW2 had followed on from CoD4 then TF141 would have been a bunch of sneaky covert stealthboys. But in every stealth mission in MW2 IW can't resist bringing the 'boomhammer' down. If you're not jumping implausible canyons on a snowmobile you're calling in predator drones on sub bases or leading the assault on a prison during a naval bombardment - none of which class as 'stealthy' in my book.