Diebold admits their software fails to record ballot deletions

Recommended Videos

Sylocat

Sci-Fi & Shakespeare
Nov 13, 2007
2,122
0
0
I feel so confident in our electoral process, don't you? [http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6995]
 

CapnGod

New member
Sep 6, 2008
463
0
0
I worked last November's election, but only as a helper. Don't remember if we were using those or not. I know we strove for accuracy and to reconcile any problems. But to have faulty systems? Shit. Just warms the cockles of my heart. And fills me with confidence, to boot.
 

Pandalisk

New member
Jan 25, 2009
3,248
0
0
Oh for the love of god you'd think something as important to america as the voting system would be tested for faults before hand for christs sake..
 

Ken Korda

New member
Nov 21, 2008
306
0
0
You should just go back to pen and paper like the UK.

You crazy Americans and your 'technology'.
 

Trisk

New member
Jan 8, 2009
27
0
0
Pandalisk said:
Oh for the love of god you'd think something as important to america as the voting system would be tested for faults before hand for christs sake..
I think 'faults' implies some sort of unintended result.

/conspiracy.
 

Cid Silverwing

Paladin of The Light
Jul 27, 2008
3,134
0
0
I thought people steadfastedly used pen and paper voting no matter what country was running elections or similar.

Guess I was wrong.
 

CapnGod

New member
Sep 6, 2008
463
0
0
Trisk said:
Pandalisk said:
Oh for the love of god you'd think something as important to america as the voting system would be tested for faults before hand for christs sake..
I think 'faults' implies some sort of unintended result.

/conspiracy.
Please tell me you're not serious. Go, work an election. After we tabulated, verified and sealed the results for our precinct, all of the election workers went to city hall, where our results were examined by auditors. We were all there to answer for any discrepancies that may have been found.

I resent the implication.
 

Trisk

New member
Jan 8, 2009
27
0
0
CapnGod said:
Trisk said:
Pandalisk said:
Oh for the love of god you'd think something as important to america as the voting system would be tested for faults before hand for christs sake..
I think 'faults' implies some sort of unintended result.

/conspiracy.
Please tell me you're not serious. Go, work an election. After we tabulated, verified and sealed the results for our precinct, all of the election workers went to city hall, where our results were examined by auditors. We were all there to answer for any discrepancies that may have been found.

I resent the implication.
I...

..the '/conspiracy' didn't ring anything with you?
 

GloatingSwine

New member
Nov 10, 2007
4,544
0
0
CapnGod said:
Please tell me you're not serious. Go, work an election. After we tabulated, verified and sealed the results for our precinct, all of the election workers went to city hall, where our results were examined by auditors. We were all there to answer for any discrepancies that may have been found.

I resent the implication.
Grunt level electoral officials might not be bent, but with a Diebold machine they'd never know if there was a problem anyway, because they don't produce a paper trail, Diebold are on much shakier ground, since they're a major Republican party donor, and there's a notable tendency for their machines to display errors in favour of Republican candidates.
 

pigmonkey

New member
Dec 24, 2008
116
0
0
CapnGod said:
Trisk said:
Pandalisk said:
Oh for the love of god you'd think something as important to america as the voting system would be tested for faults before hand for christs sake..
I think 'faults' implies some sort of unintended result.

/conspiracy.
Please tell me you're not serious. Go, work an election. After we tabulated, verified and sealed the results for our precinct, all of the election workers went to city hall, where our results were examined by auditors. We were all there to answer for any discrepancies that may have been found.

I resent the implication.
ummm i hope that is just very very subtle sarcasm, if its not your are the easiest person in the world to offend, i mean wow... lol i can just picture you wearing a cowboy hat and a long moustache saying " COSPIRANCY EH?!?! you sir have insulted my honour! i challege you to a duel!"
 

CapnGod

New member
Sep 6, 2008
463
0
0
Don't worry, there was some tongue in cheek, don't worry. However, in all seriousness, there was a paper trail from the time we opened the polls to the time we closed. As much figuring and reconciling as we had to do, we'd have noticed a discrepancy. The other possibility is that we didn't use those machines.

Also, I'd look ridiculous in a cowboy hat.