Since the spiderman series will be rebooted again with marvel I believe they should release a directors cut of TASM 1 and 2 since we a know thanks to Sony the films became such a mess and I believe the cast and crew should deserve some credit for their actual vision of the series. We would see the characters finally be seen done justice and we would see how the characters can interact well with eachother.
Directors cut of TASM 1 and 2
- Thread starter Madnack45
- Start date
Recommended Videos
it would obviously make the chemistry with every character better and be true to how the characters are like peter, spidey, gwen, harry, the lizard, aunt may, etc. showing us the connors family, more moments with spiderman, some well made executions, ben parker being in TASM 2, etc.
i don't care for the parents but i do care about the characters in this series and i believe they should get the credit they deserve
i don't care for the parents but i do care about the characters in this series and i believe they should get the credit they deserve
as i said. what makes you think any cut scenes will make it better? unless you've seen everything they cut you cant be sure. maybe they were removed because they suck.
to make it actually better you'd likely have to rewrite and reshoot half the movies.
to make it actually better you'd likely have to rewrite and reshoot half the movies.
You don't even know what they're adding and what they're taking. There's nothing obious about anything.Madnack45 said:
Im pretty sure the amazing series is going to be swept under a rug never to be spoken of again while Moviebob giggles joyously over its remains.
Also why would they promote an old version of the character when they have their slick new Marvel Model to promote? maybe in the long run we will get 'TASM: the extended cut' but I doubt its an immediate concern
Also why would they promote an old version of the character when they have their slick new Marvel Model to promote? maybe in the long run we will get 'TASM: the extended cut' but I doubt its an immediate concern
i believe there is considering the films are both four hours long and it would be helpful to be more faithful to the characters and the origin. there are scenes that would make things more relatable for characters like peter parker, harry osborn and curt connorsJohnny Novgorod said:
sure we can, and i will.Madnack45 said:
like with the Green Lantern movie all i have to do is purge it from my brain. it's a dangerous process involving large quantities of alcohol and picking a fight with someone much larger than me. but it'll be worth it in the end.
What "worked"? I'm sure you have your opinion, but the 2003 Daredevil was an unmitigated pile of crap. Nothing could be done to save it.Madnack45 said:
a) Again, there was no "good version" of the 2003 Daredevil film.Madnack45 said:
b) Unless you've been living under a rock for the past 6 years, then you should know that Marvel is doing an extended cinematic universe. The 2003 Daredevil film was made by Fox, back before the rights returned to Marvel, and was way before the MCU got underway. Having the TV series for Daredevil is just bringing him into the current timeline, where the events of that shat-stain of a film that was made in 2003 don't exist. You know, exactly how they're going to be treating Spiderman's return to the MCU and ignoring the shat-stains of films that TASM were.
I haven't seen either movie, so I might well be wrong, but...
Can the concept of a "directors cut" even apply to movies built by studio committee? I mean, there's movies where you've got a director with a certain idea in mind that he/she was forced to compromise for the studio, and then there's movies where creative control is completely in the hands of the studio spreadsheet jockeys, and the director is more or less just a site foreman. Everything I've seen and read about the ASM movies heavily implies the latter.
Also, everything I've seen and read seems to indicate the movies would be improved mostly by trimming, not by adding. So if the idea of a "directors cut" can apply, it'd be like Blood Simple or the "final cut" DC of Blade Runner (awkward as it is to compare ASM to that stuff).
Can the concept of a "directors cut" even apply to movies built by studio committee? I mean, there's movies where you've got a director with a certain idea in mind that he/she was forced to compromise for the studio, and then there's movies where creative control is completely in the hands of the studio spreadsheet jockeys, and the director is more or less just a site foreman. Everything I've seen and read about the ASM movies heavily implies the latter.
Also, everything I've seen and read seems to indicate the movies would be improved mostly by trimming, not by adding. So if the idea of a "directors cut" can apply, it'd be like Blood Simple or the "final cut" DC of Blade Runner (awkward as it is to compare ASM to that stuff).
As was I. The original cut was crap. The director's cut was crap. The film was just crap, through and through.Madnack45 said:
It could show up, but I doubt it will. The director doesn't own the rights to the film, it's up to Sony's discretion whether or not this happens. And, since it seems that they're trying to get on board the MCU, I doubt they be trying to remind anyone that TASM films exist.
people liked the directors cut of daredevil. and i said liked not loved. though some loved the directors cut of that movie.madwarper said:
i for one hope they don't leave it in the dust. i also hope marvel would decide to release that version. let TASM series be its own universe. the casts and crew deserve that much