DMR : There Will Be Blood

Recommended Videos

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
This is the first time I have tried to review a film, so any constructive criticism would be greatly appreciated.

There will be Blood is a 2007 film directed and written for the screen by Paul Anderson. Running time: 158 minutes.

Ignore the advert afterwords - this is the best quality trailer I could find


?There will be Blood?, whenever I mention that title to someone who has not heard of this film they immediately think of an action film. Clichéd, yes, but they do. Thankfully There Will be Blood is not referencing violence ? it is a reference to Oil.

Paul Anderson (who had directed Blossoms and Blood in 2003 before this film) loosely based this screenplay on the book Oil, written by Upton Sinclair. I use the term loosely because, as Paul Anderson himself admits, ?"there's not enough of the book... to feel like it's a proper adaptation."

The film centers around Daniel Plainview (excellently played by Daniel Day - Lewis), and his bid to earn money through the oil business, around the year 1900. Plainview, and his ?partner?, (who he refers to as his son) H.W own a large amount of land, which they use to dig up and export oil. They are constantly searching for new areas of land to buy and drain. After a tip, Plainview travels to a small shack in California, where he strikes oil. The film then turns, as Plainview, and a local priest (Eli) argue about the value of religious ideas. Plainview begins to turn crazy, expressing hate and anger towards everything ? the viewers also learn of his troubled past, and future.

That is a very straight foreword version of the plot. I have tried to keep it as spoiler-free as possible. The plot itself is easy to understand, but the ideas displayed are complex. What really makes this film stand out, among others, is the level of sophistication these ideas are displayed with. Greed, religion, lies are all expressed in this film.

Although the film may be set around 1900 (the film advances throughout a decade) the dialogue is easy to understand, dramatic and clever.

H.M. Tilford: We'll make you a millionaire while you're sitting here from one minute to the next.
Plainview: What else would I do with myself?
H.M. Tilford: Are you asking me?
Plainview: What else would I do with myself?
H.M. Tilford: Take care of your son. I don't know what you would do.
Plainview: If you were me and Standard offered to buy what you had for a million dollars, why? So, why?
H.M. Tilford: You know why.
Plainview: Yeah, you fellows need to scratch around in the dirt and find it like the rest of us instead of buying up someone else's hard work.
J.J. Carter: [defensively] I've scratched around in the dirt, son.
H.M. Tilford: Where you going to put it all? Where? Build a pipeline, make a deal with Union Oil, be my guest. But if you can't pull it off, you got an ocean of oil under your feet, with nowhere to go. Why not turn it over to us? We'll make you rich. You spend time with your boy. It's a great discovery... Now let us help you.

Source : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0469494/

[http://www.imagehosting.com/]

Whilst the plot is compelling, the one part of the film that certainly stands out to me is the acting. Daniel Day-Lewis does a fantastic job as Daniel Plainview. Showering the audience with a wave of different emotions, perfectly capturing Plainview?s happiest days, his saddest days, and the madness stirring inside him. It should also be noted that Day Lewis won an Academy Award - Best actor for his performance. Other noteworthy performances include that of Eli Sunday (played by Paul Dano) and Henry Brands (played by Kevin O?Connor). In short, the standard of acting is extraordinary, as you can no doubt tell from the trailers I have posted.

The atmosphere is also extremely well done; the tone of the film never slows down - despite the large amounts of exposition, because you wish to learn more behind the interesting characters Anderson has created.

The films biggest failing, is its music. I know everybody has different tastes, but if you listen to the end of the trailers you will hear the type of music played. Composed by Johnny Greenwood (the guitarist for Radiohead!), the music just doesn?t suit the vibe of the film. It features disjointed thuds, as opposed to the simple melodies I feel would have worked to far greater effect in this film. On the other hand, his work has recently been nominated for a Grammy.

There Will be Blood is a truly terrific film, nominated for 8 Oscars (and winning 2) the film has been called a ?masterpiece? by a number of acclaimed critics.

I urge any self-respecting DVD player owner to rent or buy this film, simply because of its overall quality. There may not be many action sequences (as opposed to this years big films, particularly The Dark Knight), but the plot, terrific acting and general nature of the film make it a marvel to spectate. If you enjoy Drama you must watch this film.

.
 

Combined

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,625
0
0
I love this movie. Well written review. Good show, sir. Tad longer would have been wonderful. More in depth, too.

And I agree about the music. I couldn't quite connect to any part of it, except for those of Mr. Parts "Fratres".
 

L.B. Jeffries

New member
Nov 29, 2007
2,175
0
0
Huh...it was a good sumary of the film but you might want to discuss things a bit more. A good criticism of a film involves a tiny bit of analysis which means spoiling a bit of the film but not so much that it isn't worth watching, you know?

Describe scenes from the film, emotions it generated. Talk about the metaphors and not what they do, but what they say.

This a review by Cynthia Fuchs, whose one of my favorite film critics writing right now, that kinda captures what I enjoy:

http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/there-will-be-blood/
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
L.B. Jeffries said:
Huh...it was a...
NordicNinja said:
Huh. I'll have to...
Whats with the "Huh's"? =p

Jeffries, thank you for the link. I did not look at any reviews before writing this, and now see how I went wrong.
 

NordicNinja

New member
Dec 17, 2008
31
0
0
A "Huh" seemed like a good idea at the time, considering I was looking for a way to textualize my ponderings.

It is mere coincidence that the esteemed poster above my first started his in a strikingly similar fashion.

 

L.B. Jeffries

New member
Nov 29, 2007
2,175
0
0
D_987 said:
L.B. Jeffries said:
Huh...it was a...
NordicNinja said:
Huh. I'll have to...
Whats with the "Huh's"? =p

Jeffries, thank you for the link. I did not look at any reviews before writing this, and now see how I went wrong.
I think it's a subconscious way to make it more conversational instead of just barging right into it. Not having that prepositional phrase makes it sound...harsher?
 

Novajam

New member
Apr 26, 2008
965
0
0
Pretty good review, but you could probably be a little more engaging in the plot summary. It's a little blocky at the moment.
D_987 said:
The film centers around Daniel Plainview (excellently played by Daniel Day - Lewis), and his bid to earn money through the oil business. The film is set around 1900. Plainview, and his "partner", H.W own a large amount of land, which they use to dig up and export oil. They are constantly searching for new areas of land to buy and drain. After a tip, Plainview travels to a small shack in California, where he strikes oil. The film then turns, as Plainview, and a local priest (Eli) argue about the value of religious ideas. Plainview begins to turn crazy, expressing hate and anger towards everything - the viewers also learn of his troubled past, and future.
The part in bold breaks the flow somewhat, because you've gone from one subject to another, and then switched back afterwards. You could move the whole paragraph around for greater effect, as thus:

The film is set in California around the year 1900, and is centred around Daniel Plainview. He and his business partner H.W. Tilford (SIDENOTE: Here you name him H.W., but later when you quote some dialogue you refer to him as H.M. Watch out for inconsistencies like those Disregard this, I have made a mistake.) are in the oil business, constantly looking for new areas of land to purchase and drain. After a tip-off to an oil strike, he argues with a priest about religious values, and then descends into madness, expressing hate and anger towards everyone and everything around him.
That's really the best I can do, as I haven't watched the film, but hopefully you get my gist. Since you have watched the film, you could also clear up why his conversation with the priest is a major turning point, and why this makes him crazy. I'd also omit actor names until later in the review, where you talk about the acting.

And I also notice that early on your spelt "trailer" as "trailr". Little thing, I know, but it's important nonetheless.

Other than that, great job. I'll be on the lookout for it next time I'm at the video store, as it sounds right up my alley.
 

qbert4ever

New member
Dec 14, 2007
798
0
0
Novajam said:
Snip snip snip
H.W. And H.M. are two different people. H.W. Is his son and "partner", while H.M. Is... Well, I don't really remember who he is seeing as how I saw the film quite a while ago and he wasn't around for very long, but the point is that they are, in fact, not the same person. Although you are right in saying that it can be confusing for somebody that had not seen it.

Anyways, this movie was weird for me. Looking back, and even during the film, I can say that it is wonderful. But for whatever reason, I found it very hard to watch. Even going so far as to need to stop it one or two times before I could finish. I guess you could say that while each scene was great to watch, there was just no suspence to make me want to go to the next one. Kind of like every scene was the climax, each one is fun, but after a while you just get tired.

If that makes sense or not.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
Thanks for the compliments, I personally thought it wasn't a particularly good review.

Thanks especialy to Novajam, I have edited the spelling error and will edit the paragraph accordingly.
 

Random Argument Man

New member
May 21, 2008
6,011
0
0
I agree with Novajam. I loved this film. The greatest thing about the movie is the evolution of character of Daniel Plainview.

Oh, the milkshake part made me chuckle for a while. (You have to see the film).
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
The "milkshake" part is meant to be a religious reference - I can't remember anything else.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
Just to point out, Johnny Greenwood is guitarist for Radiohead, not Razorlight. Might not have bothered me so much if there weren't such a vast difference in quality between the two bands.
Most definatly; although I constantly get the 2 bands mixed up.
 

Sindaine

New member
Dec 29, 2008
438
0
0
There will be blood.

There will also be slight delays.
After-holiday sales.
Representatives onhand to answer your questions.
No horseplay.
Refreshments.