Dirty Apple said:
Because I don't. Or, at least, not that I've ever known. I've known some very smart people, but no one that I for sure knew to be genius level intelligence. If you do know a genius, what are they like personality wise. Aloof and contemptuous, or are they out-going and personable? I'm very curious about your experiences.
According to my high school guidance councilor, I technically qualify as a genius. I'm not sure I actually believe that, but I guess it fits. I can't be bothered to independently verify that one way or the other (though the one time I took an online IQ test, it said my IQ was 142). I can see myself qualifying as a genius mostly because I learn at a rather ridiculous rate and I am capable of making (correct) logical connections and intuitive leaps that most people, in my experience, simply can't. All throughout school (including college), I never had to really work at anything. It almost all came naturally to me once the teacher walked me through the process.
I'm not sure I am though, simply because I don't seem any
smarter than other people, I just have a natural ability to sift information more efficiently. I'm not explaining it terribly well, but basically I know "better", not more than others.
If I do qualify, I'm (almost too much so) reserved around people I'm unfamiliar with, but rather outgoing once I get talking. I've been told I'm fairly charismatic as well. I'd like to think I'm not overly arrogant or contemptuous, but I'm honest enough with myself to know I have my moments of feeling superior. Mostly when people simply can't make (what I see as) basic logical connections.
Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:
A true genius is smart enough to discount the results of an IQ test.
To be entirely fair, an IQ test can be used as a measure of reasoning ability. It's most certainly not a be-all, end-all metric, but it can act as a valid means of comparison. The only real problem with such a test is that someone can get different scores on the same test, depending on how well-rested they are, how much preparation they did, and what they were thinking/doing before the test started.
It's a valid metric, but not an absolute one.