Do you Like Fallout 3? Yes.No.

Recommended Videos

ROFLross

New member
Jan 8, 2009
226
0
0
It was great, couldn't get enough of the V.A.T.S system; currently not playing it because I didn't want to play the same missions over again just with a bad character.
Just waiting for the new expansions to come out before I start playing it again.
 

deewank

New member
Dec 15, 2008
335
0
0
it was a good game but it suck as that you have to die in the end leaving no like you know THE END? kinda thing
 

GenHellspawn

New member
Jan 1, 2008
1,841
0
0
Tattaglia said:
It's called judging a game fairly.
Basically, the "you can't judge a game until you've played for X hours" argument. Side quests are great if you like the game, but since I didn't, why bother?
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,063
0
0
My wife & I love it.
I just finished it and while I really enjoyed the game as a whole. The ending was crap; for an open world style game.
 

hippo24

New member
Apr 29, 2008
702
0
0
GenHellspawn said:
Tattaglia said:
you never tried the sidequests
No, I didn't. That's why they're called side quests, because you don't have to do them. If you can beat a game in 10 minutes (IE. Fallout) then the game is short, no matter how many irrelevant side quests surround it.
So your saying you would have LIKED the game if it had MADE you do the side-quests, but because it DIDN'T, It's bad?

Im completely confused?
 

GenHellspawn

New member
Jan 1, 2008
1,841
0
0
hippo24 said:
Im completely confused?
It would've been bad regardless, I'm saying that just because there's an abundance of sidequests, doesn't mean the game is longer, it means the game can be longer.
 

hippo24

New member
Apr 29, 2008
702
0
0
GenHellspawn said:
hippo24 said:
Im completely confused?
It would've been bad regardless, I'm saying that just because there's an abundance of sidequests, doesn't mean the game is longer, it means the game can be longer.
Ohh sounds like you have more of a problem with the game itself (gameplay,story) then the actual length.
 

slappahoe69

New member
Dec 5, 2008
18
0
0
yeah, it is pretty much oblivion with guns and that's why it's so good. VATS is excellent, it's what made the game. i just hope the ending isn't as bad for me as people say it is.
 

OuroborosChoked

New member
Aug 20, 2008
558
0
0
Sejs Cube said:
Explanation - both of the previous Fallout games did a pretty good job explaining where things came from and how they got to where they are now. Particularly the game's iconic badguys, the super mutants. They didn't just spring up out of nowhere and were generally violent, mindless dickjobs. They were created by the Master at Mariposa. No Master, no super mutants. Fallout 3's super mutants were just kinda.. there. No explanation, not even a basic one. They just were, now get to shootin'. That's sloppy. It wouldn't have been difficult to drop even just a side quest in that explains that the Master, when he was getting the whole mutant army thing rolling, sent one of his lieutenants back east to secure what he thought were essential resources. Master gets cakked and the Lt (when he finds out), as he's still a big believer in the cause, decides he's going to be the next Master and starts up the dipping program again. And that's just off the top of my head. But we didn't even get that much.
Correction!

There is an explanation and ThreeDog even comments on it: the Super Mutants capture people and take them back... somewhere... and genetically manipulate them to make more Super Mutants. Vague? Yes... and a bit plot-holey (how do massive thickies like Super Mutants know how to do genetic engineering?), but it's an explanation. There's even a random encounter that goes into more detail... I think his name is Uncle Leo. He's a peaceful Super Mutant who just walks the Wasteland, unarmed and unarmored... like Kane from Kung Fu.

http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Uncle_Leo

But perhaps you just weren't paying attention...
 

Axolotl

New member
Feb 17, 2008
2,401
0
0
OuroborosChoked said:
Correction!

There is an explanation and ThreeDog even comments on it: the Super Mutants capture people and take them back... somewhere... and genetically manipulate them to make more Super Mutants. Vague? Yes... and a bit plot-holey (how do massive thickies like Super Mutants know how to do genetic engineering?), but it's an explanation. There's even a random encounter that goes into more detail... I think his name is Uncle Leo. He's a peaceful Super Mutant who just walks the Wasteland, unarmed and unarmored... like Kane from Kung Fu.

http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Uncle_Leo

But perhaps you just weren't paying attention...
OK full explanation of the Super-Mutants in Fallout 3 is that they come from vault 87 where all the inhabitants were exposed to a modified version of the experimental FEV. Since their mind degenerates and they're infertile the Super-Mutants kidnap people and take them back to vault 87 to replenish their numbers.
 

Arker

New member
Jan 13, 2009
29
0
0
I just started and it's ok, think Oblivion is better though. Fallout 3 Is funnier.
 

fdman

New member
Dec 23, 2008
4
0
0
Could not get into it, and I tried multiple times because everybody raves how good it is. The story and characters were good, but the combat was so clunky and ridiculous(4 point blank shots to the melon and your still coming at me, really?)that I just gave up. Mass Effect, on the other hand, got it right. I guess it just wasn't for me.
 

Chimpa

New member
Dec 2, 2008
55
0
0
i mean apart from the rather upsetting ending, the V.A.T.S aiming system felt rather swanky when you ran up to someone with the combat shotgun and went for the headshot from a few feet away, endless fun.
 

Valiance

New member
Jan 14, 2009
3,823
0
0
I like it very much. Fallout 2 will still have a place in my heart as a game I appreciate more, though.

Not to say that one is necessarily better than the other.

Fallout 3 is buggy. Not much more buggy than earlier games, but it's still buggy.
It is a lot like oblivion so I've heard, but I think it holds your hand less. I wouldn't know since I haven't played oblivion.

The game is great. The end made me really dislike it more, but I just consider the whole thing non-canon anyway.

Kinda wish it was bigger. I have 65+ hours of playtime but it just feels odd.