Do you prefer 2d fighting games or 3d fighting games.

Recommended Videos

tonyh900

New member
May 16, 2010
173
0
0
2d being like street fighter, blazblue, mortal kombat's 1-3 and 2011, and persona 4 arena. 3d being tekken, virtua fighter, dead or alive, and the mortal kombat's from 4 to armageddon. I personally prefer 2d fighting games.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
I generally prefer my fighting games to be locked to two dimensions of movement (Soul Calibur being the exception).
However, I'm indifferent to if the models are 2D sprites or 3D models.
 

The Wykydtron

"Emotions are very important!"
Sep 23, 2010
5,458
0
0
2D. The little of 3D ones i've played is an absolute clusterfuck of particle effects and the camera and spacing of 3D fighting makes it harder to tell if you're hitting or not.

I have played several 2D fighters, UMVC3, BlazBlue, Persona 4 Arena and Skullgirls in the 3D corner is... Soul Caliber 4. Yeah, not the best balance. I will say ring outs are fucking hilarious though. Especially any dive moves that can unintentionally ring out yourself with.

I still love the troll move of winning a round then during the last few seconds of movement, dive headfirst off the stage for no reason.


ArcSys has the 2D mechanics down well, I think Persona 4 Arena has the best balance of mechanics to date. Autocombos cost health and overall do relatively little damage, everyone has a move that relieves pressure but it costs health and spamming it is the fastest way to die (looking at you Shadow Labrys,) the passive Awakening comeback system is as fair as it is genius (I think they're continuing it in Chrono Phantasma with Overdrive) and every character is viable. Except Elisabeth. Elisabeth has some fucking MAJOR flaws.

Also BURSTS! EVERY 2D fighting game needs a Burst mechanic, it makes things way more fun. Seriously, if Skullgirls had a proper Burst instead of this shitty Infinite Protection System it would be really fun. Nobody likes being on the receiving end of 20 second combos, everyone has them and the community has found a way around the IPS so it never procs which ironically only makes touch of death combos worse.

Oh and when the IPS does activate, it's unsafe as fuck and if the guy has a combo that damaging he'll account for it and just block it. So it's not only worthless it's a free reset.
 

NeutralDrow

New member
Mar 23, 2009
9,097
0
0
Generally 2D (or 2.5D in the case of some games, like Fate/Unlimited Codes). I don't know if it's inherent or just my perception, but it feels like the limited dimension allows for easier controls and more of my kind of complexity. Especially if they have decent movement controls, like Arcana Heart or Melty Blood. Reading a Tekken or Virtua Fighter movelist makes my eyes spin.

The main exceptions would be Soul Calibur 2 and Virtual On. SC2 because the movement is fairly constrained but predictable (unlike later games) and the movelists are simpler and easier to understand. Virtual On because freaking robots with jetpacks.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
while not a PURE fighting game, i much prefer 3D (partially because of this one game) as ff: dissidia is the ONE fighting game to ever hold my glance for more than a 15-20 minutes, every other game either puts me to sleep or annoys me off the bat, so that's saying something. I really hope they do an updated version of it for the ps4, which will allow for both joysticks to be used, which will make for some amazing amounts of fun!

(note: It's been a year and a half since i played the game, i had to sell my psp and so haven't played it since, but i would love for it to be on the ps4)
 

tonyh900

New member
May 16, 2010
173
0
0
The Wykydtron said:
2D. The little of 3D ones i've played is an absolute clusterfuck of particle effects and the camera and spacing of 3D fighting makes it harder to tell if you're hitting or not.

I have played several 2D fighters, UMVC3, BlazBlue, Persona 4 Arena and Skullgirls in the 3D corner is... Soul Caliber 4. Yeah, not the best balance. I will say ring outs are fucking hilarious though. Especially any dive moves that can unintentionally ring out yourself with.

I still love the troll move of winning a round then during the last few seconds of movement, dive headfirst off the stage for no reason.


ArcSys has the 2D mechanics down well, I think Persona 4 Arena has the best balance of mechanics to date. Autocombos cost health and overall do relatively little damage, everyone has a move that relieves pressure but it costs health and spamming it is the fastest way to die (looking at you Shadow Labrys,) the passive Awakening comeback system is as fair as it is genius (I think they're continuing it in Chrono Phantasma with Overdrive) and every character is viable. Except Elisabeth. Elisabeth has some fucking MAJOR flaws.

Also BURSTS! EVERY 2D fighting game needs a Burst mechanic, it makes things way more fun. Seriously, if Skullgirls had a proper Burst instead of this shitty Infinite Protection System it would be really fun. Nobody likes being on the receiving end of 20 second combos, everyone has them and the community has found a way around the IPS so it never procs which ironically only makes touch of death combos worse.

Oh and when the IPS does activate, it's unsafe as fuck and if the guy has a combo that damaging he'll account for it and just block it. So it's not only worthless it's a free reset.
I understand with Elizabeth. You don't know how many times I've lost online matches due to my opponent constantly spamming ziodyne(though I have managed to get past it a few times but it ends up the same way after a few seconds).
 

StriderShinryu

New member
Dec 8, 2009
4,987
0
0
I quite enjoy both but, if I'm being honest, I probably prefer 3D fighters these days. Actually, I like watching 2D fighters more but I prefer to play 3D fighters. *shrug*
 

Extra-Ordinary

Elite Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,065
0
41
2D

Mainly because for some reason, when my opponent starts moving around me through depth, I simply can't hit them, I have no idea why. With the latest MK I'm pretty good,
Where you gonna run now, boy?! Only left and right here!
But add in a Z axis and I'm dead.
 

FPLOON

Your #1 Source for the Dino Porn
Jul 10, 2013
12,531
0
0
Weaver said:
I generally prefer my fighting games to be locked to two dimensions of movement (Soul Calibur being the exception).
However, I'm indifferent to if the models are 2D sprites or 3D models.
Ninja'd!

OT: I mostly end up playing 2D fighters, anyway... There are certain 3D fighters I will try to avoid to the best of my ability... *stares at UMVC3*
But, for the most part, the latest Street Fighter IV (that my friend bought after playing one of the arcade versions of Street Fighter II at a pizza place) and Tekken I'm fine with playing casually... So far, only Persona 4 Arena, Blazblue, and Skullgirls (all 2D fighters) do I even remotely play competitively... I suck competitively, mind you, but I stopped caring after the first cancel and/or counter...
 

blackdwarf

New member
Jun 7, 2010
606
0
0
both. I really like both of them. I have no issues playing with sidestep, so I can enjoy both versions.
 

MrBaskerville

New member
Mar 15, 2011
871
0
0
Depends on my mood. but my favourite fighting games are 2D, så that's probably the winner. I mostly play Capcom Vs Snk 2, Street Fighter Alpha 3 and Guilty Gear X2 but occasionally i will pop in some Soul Calibur 4 or Virtua Fighter 5.
 

Guitarmasterx7

Day Pig
Mar 16, 2009
3,872
0
0
2d. 3D fighters always have too many fucking moves in them. In 2d fighters you can learn a character by playing them for a few matches and maybe looking at how to do their specials. It's more about the mechanics of the game than memorizing moves. In a 3d fighter I feel like you almost have to make flashcards like there's a fucking chemistry test coming up to memorize a character's moveset. I don't have the patience or time for that. I play soul calibur because you can make captain america with a fuzzy star spangled penis but aside from that, i dont care for them.
 

Terramax

New member
Jan 11, 2008
3,747
0
0
I like them both. Although, contrary to Guitarmasterx7, I dislike the fact that most 2D fighters, you only get about 4 or 5 f-ing moves per character, making gameplay for 2D fighters very limited on most games. It's worse when some character's move sets are useless. Also, I don't like how they're trying to make 2D fighter's 'deeper'. 'Impenetrable' more like'.

3D fighters are fun, but they too appear to have lost the magic they once had for me.

I usually play fighting games on the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast still. Current gen fighters haven't lived up to expectations, 2D or 3D.
 

SonofaJohannes

New member
Apr 18, 2011
740
0
0
Definitely 3D, they're just more fun. Plus they generally feel like the moves have more impact. Not to mention that they more moves. In Street Fighter you press the punch button 3 times and the character will do 3 identical punches, while in DOA it'll be a jab, hook and uppercut. Much more variation.

But Super Smash Bros is one of my favourite franchises of all time, and those are 2D. But that's really the exception, most other 2D games are soooooo boooooring.