But how can you choose the best people? We need more engineers and scientists and not more convenience store clerks - but are engineers and scientists necessarily the best people? Perhaps the newly immigrated convenience store clerk is an incredible person who brightens everyone's day, whilst the newly immigrated engineer is a talentless hack who will drift from job to job contributing nothing worthwhile. Selecting the best people is a noble goal, but it involves a great deal of quantifying qualities which are inherently nonlinear. The deadbeat Haitian welfare mom may squeeze out the next George Washington Carver - people are inherently chaotic and non-linear.Easykill said:Saskwach, I was thinking we should just, you know, IMPORT those guys from third world countries over here. Solves all problems, and we can pick and choose the best people to bring over. Besides, humanity isn't even close to being in danger, it doesn't matter.
As for werepossum- I don't see myself ever valuing someone more just because we have some of the same genes, and if I ever do, I won't be the same person; so I don't mind screwing him over by getting a vasectomy. Adoption or nothing for me I think.
As for adoption, certainly you'll love your adopted child every bit as much as a child of your blood. I don't think I've ever met anyone who adopted and later regretted it, and rescuing orphans from grinding poverty is certainly a blessed action. My points were simply that you may later change your mind and that genetic hearing loss isn't necessarily a disqualification from being a parent.