Did you know that you can't return most products solely on the basis that you didn't like it? Also I don't think you realise how wrong you are.Mariena post=18.73544.843294 said:Dear god, this is worse than an atheist vs Christian debate.jim_doki post=18.73544.843278 said:so, what you are saying is because you can copy it and play it for free, you should have that right? regardless of whether you pay for it in the end or not, its ok for you to steal something because "it doesn't hurt anyone" even though it quite clearly does?
You have my view, you have my point. Done. It doesn't hurt anyone because I pay for it. It only hurts the developer if I don't pay for it. Which I don't.
All you're saying is that I should buy games even if they're a horribly putrid piece of crap. I've made all my damn points in my past few posts and although I'm getting tired of repeating myself, I obviously can't get it through your head. This is probably the only industry where you have to deal with it. You can't return a shitty product, even though if it was *anything* else, like a TV, or a car, or a telephone, whatever, you would be able to.
It "hurts" them because you *expect* me to put up with shitty products.
Here is an example of something non-tangible: You want to buy a certain model car. The problem arises that you can't test drive it and have no way of physically testing the vehicle yourself. So, from my understanding of your reasoning, the only way to fix this problem is to "borrow" the car from a dealership and then return it if you don't like it and if you do like it you might buy it?
EDIT: Grammar