Does Jim Sterling need to drop his gimmick?

Recommended Videos

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,718
0
0
Krychek08 said:
I get that he's satirizing, that doesn't mean I enjoy the delivery. He's trying to be edgy and make a name for himself, but to me he sounds like everyone else. In a slightly more annoying package.
Its been his gimmick for over 10 years, he's like a British Maddox, before he was hired by Destructoid he had his own site called Morphine Nation where he was just the same. Its a shame that he had to leave it because he had an awesome comic series called "Skeletor is" (which he did) and "Cane Hat Man" (some other bloke did).

I'll try to find some archives because its good reading, "10 uses for David Duchovny" was brilliant.
 

OliverTwist72

New member
Nov 22, 2010
487
0
0
Let's just say you aren't going to agree with my opinion since you seem so set in stone. However, throwing around thinly veiled insults (I realize it wasn't you but another poster) is hardly a way to foster a constructive debate.

I will say this in response to your post, did you think Gulliver's Travels was edgy? (I don't have a hidden agenda behind this question, I'm merely curious).
 

InsomniJack

New member
Dec 4, 2009
335
0
0
Frankly, he can do whatever he wants. I saw everything I needed to see in his first three episodes and decided he wasn't worth my time. It's as simple as that.

If he's got a routine that people like, then he sure as hell isn't going to abandon it. It's part of what makes Denis Leary popular, as well as the Nostalgia Critic, and just about any wrestler out there; it's that small diversion from reality that brings the intrigue to them.

I don't watch him because I personally don't find him funny. It's as simple as that. No one is to blame. It's just a difference in taste.
 

370999

New member
May 17, 2010
1,107
0
0
I like it. I agree it was't good in the begining but now I find it pretty cool. I still think he is massively wrong on some things but I do like the impression I get of him as someone who doesn't treat games really seriously unlike say MovieBob who does come across like an evangelical preacher at time, certain that his words are true and what he says is really hard hitting and important.
 

Stammer

New member
Apr 16, 2008
1,726
0
0
Irridium said:
He keeps up the persona for the same reason Yahtzee keeps up his fast-talking shtick.

It's just his thing.
While true, at least Yahtzee's fast-talking shtick is entertaining and charming. Jim's persona DETRACTS from the experience of watching his videos. I might actually consider him as good as, say, Extra Credits, if he didn't literally go out of his way to make me hate him with every video.

It removes credibility from his videos and makes a lot of people simply downright ignore him.
 

The Shade

New member
Mar 20, 2008
2,392
0
0
ZeZZZZevy said:
Every person who speaks for entertainment needs some sort of shtick to call their own and get people's attention. You wouldn't want to listen to someone who speaks in monotone all the time would you?
Love this series, and all its craziness.

----------------

OT: I never liked Jim Sterling in the first place, and I'm not sure he's made much of an improvement since. Too much being angry for angry's sake, not enough real point being made.

'course, I don't even watch Yahtzee anymore, really. And I can't stand MovieBob. Hell, I don't think I've kept watching any shows since Doomsday Arcade ended and Doraleous & Associates went on "sabbatical" or whatever.

Huh... so why am I even here?
*leaves*
 

Inkidu

New member
Mar 25, 2011
966
0
0
I don't think he behaves like that in person. Look at this week's episode. He basically punches himself with self-deprecating humor. I don't think Yahtzee acts that way in person either. If they do it's just a small facet of their personalities that they magnify to make it funny.

So as long as he continues to be funny I don't care, go right on ahead, you self-appointed dictator of all things right in video games.
 

HentMas

The Loneliest Jedi
Apr 17, 2009
2,650
0
0
to be perfectly hones, i find it funny that he haves to pay like 15 seconds to every other video he makes EXPLAINING that its just a damn act! and if he needs to explain people its an act to create a response, then i have to say "Well done Jim, Well done"

keep the persona, but making a column where you are more level headed (like ZP) would make people understand its just an act instead of OMG THIS GUY IS A DICK!!!!
 

OliverTwist72

New member
Nov 22, 2010
487
0
0
anthony87 said:
You know he already has a name for himself right? The Escapist isn't the first site he's been featured on. Also, you say that you get that he's satirizing, then you say that he's trying to be edgy.....but the edginess is what he's being satiricle about, so what's the problem?
I think this poster said it better than I could have:
Stammer said:
Jim's persona DETRACTS from the experience of watching his videos. I might actually consider him as good as, say, Extra Credits, if he didn't literally go out of his way to make me hate him with every video.

It removes credibility from his videos and makes a lot of people simply downright ignore him.
Altho I don't actively hate him, I just turn him off because it's annoying. It isn't the content I'm uninterested in, it's the delivery.

Edit: I also get that what he states is actually the opposite of his opinion sometimes, which I thought was obvious. But since I'm not as smart as some people apparently I missed it. That's what I meant by his opinion is in line with everyone elses.
 

intheweeds

New member
Apr 6, 2011
817
0
0
Lokithrsourcerer said:
the only thing that doesn't sit right for me is the delivery.

the imagery and style of the show is as though he is a "fixer" or a dictator
but it doesn't come across very well as he is camp as Christmas.
For me , that's the joke. It's a big play on how people who have these opinion videos are all telling us how we should act and what to think and we are stupid otherwise. There are many who vocally call some of these shows out on being 'preachy'. He's just taking it to the extreme and making a joke of it. Why not drop the facade and just present yourself as a dictator? I think that's good comedy.

I also agree with the people here who are saying that he's an entertainer and he has to have some kind of persona and/or schtick. I might be biased though, I've 'got' his humor since his first video on the Escapist.
 

lord.jeff

New member
Oct 27, 2010
1,468
0
0
lockecole21 said:
the only thing i despise about Jim is his seemingly unlimited hate for nintendo.seems they'll never ever do anything right according to his viewpoint.while not a nintedno fanboy it get's really really old having to listen to him whine about it.i really wish he'd talk about something else.on the time's he does i actually enjoy his show.
I never got that from he always seemed more Yactzee's thing to hate on Nintendo, Jim praises Kirby's Epic yarn.

It's not so much I hate his gimmick I'm just tired of it over all lots of people seem to use the get everyone angry thing, I'd like more verity in internet personas.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Stammer said:
Irridium said:
He keeps up the persona for the same reason Yahtzee keeps up his fast-talking shtick.

It's just his thing.
While true, at least Yahtzee's fast-talking shtick is entertaining and charming. Jim's persona DETRACTS from the experience of watching his videos. I might actually consider him as good as, say, Extra Credits, if he didn't literally go out of his way to make me hate him with every video.

It removes credibility from his videos and makes a lot of people simply downright ignore him.
True, his video's aren't for everyone. If you don't like them, there isn't much I can say to change your mind. All I can suggest is to read his written stuff. I feel they're much, much better than his videos. Still has his blunt style, but it's not the same as his arrogant persona.

http://www.gamefront.com/solving-the-sixty-dollar-situation/
http://www.destructoid.com/esports-defenders-the-reason-why-esports-can-t-be-sports-208512.phtml
 

i7omahawki

New member
Mar 22, 2010
298
0
0
AlternatePFG said:
Krychek08 said:
Also, what annoys me is he states his opinions like he's the only one in the universe holding this point of view.
You do realize that that is supposed to be satirical, right?
Satirical of what?

OT: In writing, I don't mind him, I don't actively seek his work out but it can be enjoyable. On video though, as you said, he mixes up "I'm a douchebag!" with "Not really, just kidding," so often it makes it worthless. Hyperbole isn't something you can just drop in and out of, and if its supposed to be a 'character', then stay in that character.

I don't like how he presents himself either way though, in character or out, and I guess that's just a personal thing. I really didn't like his early stuff, most of which was clearly flamebait, so I've simply stopped watching.

In principle, it could be a good schtick, and from his writing it seems like he has the ideas to pull it off, but somewhere in the middle it just becomes unconvincing. I don't believe him when he is saying "I'm the best," and I don't believe him when he says "Naw just kidding," making it incredibly difficult to buy into it.

Yahtzee and Moviebob, however, seem to stick to their personas perfectly, perhaps because they're a little closer to the real them maybe. Either way I wouldn't take out Yahtzee's point blank cynicism, nor Moviebob's sophisticate/pretentious dynamic.
 

Jimothy Sterling

New member
Apr 18, 2011
5,976
0
0
I don't usually respond to the forums because, well, my discussions with forum members haven't gone great in the past (which was partially my fault, heh). Stumbled on this one while gauging some feedback for something else, and it's a pretty interesting thread, so I figured I'd chime in.

Firstly, I'll let you know why the show took the direction it took. As you all know by now, the first video was absolutely loathed by everybody. Production values were worse than they currently are (which means they REALLY sucked) and my unscripted rambling wasn't received as well as they had been on Dtoid. So, I took a week off and addressed the criticism. I tightened up the scripting, I cobbled a set together, and tried something else. I got pretty much the same reaction, with some people not even addressing the changes and acting like none were made.

It seemed to me that Escapist commenters were going to make me a villain no matter what, so I thought to myself, "Fine, I shall give them a villain. The antithesis of everything they like. To the laboratory!" I'd already concluded the show was dead on its feet, so I'd just amuse myself while waiting for it to keel over. Thus, I ramped up the arrogance factor, which I found incredibly fun (undeserved ego is one of my favorite comedy tropes). I figured that if the Escapist audience did not want to enjoy my show, the least I could do is provide them with something they enjoyed hating.

How ironic, then, that when I decided to give the Escapist something to really hate, the majority of them began to like it. That I decided to embrace the hatred and ended up becoming embraced myself is, perhaps, the perfect way to conclude that The Jimquisition has and always will be a running failure. It failed to make everybody like it when it tried, and it failed to make everybody hate it when it tried. Of course, it's ended up as a *happy* failure, but still, kinda funny.

Anyway, I'm enjoying the gimmick far too much to want to see it go away just yet, as it seems to still resonate with a lot of people. Somebody said that the dictator vibe doesn't work because I'm "camp as Christmas." That's part of what I love about doing it. The red flag, the trenchcoat, it IS obvious that it isn't who I am and it IS obvious that the gimmick is undermined the moment my girly voice comes out of my mouth. That, to me, is the fun of the show. The messiah gimmick is woefully pathetic and doesn't really work, but I think that's why so many people ended up finding it endearing rather than annoying. I realize it's not for everybody, and that some people will ignore it, but that's the risk of any presentation, right? I'm sorry if some people don't like it, but I'm ultimately more grateful for those that do.

Anyway, I apologize for what was a lengthy, self-indulgent, thoroughly unwarranted analysis of my own stupidity. Carry on!
 

Seventh Actuality

New member
Apr 23, 2010
551
0
0
What bothers me about his gimmick is that he sucks at it. Once the actual episodes get going, they're always worth watching, but during the live action segments his delivery is terrible and his schtick is tired and predictable. It's not at all comparable to Yahtzee and Moviebob, who only play exaggerated versions of their own identities and opinions for comic effect; Jim puts on a full-on stage persona, seemingly just because it's what the cool kids do, regardless of the fact that he's no good at it and it doesn't gel with the actual content of his videos.

It also irks me that so many of his defenders seem to think people who dislike him just don't "get" that he's a troll and the preening "thank god for me stuff" isn't serious. Everybody "gets" it, it's about as subtle as anvil pie.
 

EmpressZombiKitty

New member
Mar 27, 2011
118
0
0
I enjoy his internet persona he's got going on. I find it funny and I tune into his show every week.

So, no, I don't want him to change a thing.
 

Bebus

New member
Feb 12, 2010
366
0
0
Thank God for Jim Sterling.

When I first saw him, my girlfriend literally left the room she found him so infuriating. That gave him instant kudos as she is normally incredible patient (works in customer service...)

But, if we can't listen to a fat British guy tell the world how great he is in a vaguely fascist-cult type manner, and let's be fair make some damn good points in the process, then we might as well give up on British humour.