I didn't mean there was NO loss of sales. The question is, how much is lost per piracy? Full value, because they stole it? No value, because they wouldn't have paid anyways? That is where the question lies. There is definitely some loss of sales, some people would have paid, and something was taken.crudus said:That is like stealing a couch and saying the same thing.tiscooler said:the pirates counter this by saying that even if a person had the money they wouldn't buy the game, so no loss in sale. No one's really quite sure.
However, its a bit more complicated then the couch metaphor. A couch when taken is a definite loss of profit, the materials are gone, merchandise has left inventory, and the value of those materials has absolutely and objectively been stolen. The problem with the piracy is that there are no physical, touchable, materials in piracy, just data, which means the company is not out the materials of the "couch". which demands the question, how much is lost per piracy? Both sides, the companies and pirates, claim complete polar opposite claims, and logic says that neither can be simultaneously right.
I don't advocate a side, and I don't say that the argument for piracy is logical or is anything beyond a rationalization. I'm just saying this is a major modern debate. We truly live in exciting times.