Dollhouse Review

Recommended Videos

Lvl 64 Klutz

Crowsplosion!
Apr 8, 2008
2,338
0
0
There are generally two ways a television show gets viewers to tune in continually week after week. The first of these strategies is to create a cast of identifiable characters and putting them in different crazy situations each week. This attracts the audience to tune in and find out what shenanigans the cast will be in that week, and is the cornerstone of old sitcoms and modern crime dramas.

The second strategy is to create a long narrative for the viewers to follow, implementing plenty of cliffhangers and unexplained plot elements to keep the audience on edge. The objective here is to "keep the audience guessing." Shows such as Lost and Heroes are famous (or infamous depending on your opinion) for doing this.

The key to a truly amazing show is to make use of both these strategies in a healthy balance. Shows like Chuck, House, and Dexter have done extremely well for this reason. (Another good strategy for a successful show: name it after the main character.) Then there are shows that try desperately to do both, and fail miserably, which brings me to Dollhouse.

Dollhouse is a show about an organization that programs people to possess characteristics requested by clients, and then essentially rents these people to the clients for a day or so. The story follows one particular "Active," as these programmable people are referred to, her handler, and an FBI agent who's searching for the organization.

It's right here that things start to get funny. You see, the organization has hundreds of clients that pay a ridiculous amount of money for these services, and they operate out of a building with a particularly nice view of some major city. Everyone in the FBI seems to know exactly what the Dollhouse is, but only this particular agent believes that it exists. See where I'm going with this? There are a lot more gaping plot holes like this one, and it's only two episodes in.

So much for the overlaying plot, yeah? So what of the episodic plots? Surely with the undeniable hottie Eliza Dushku in the role of a programmable person, there must be some crazy action going on. Well, let's see. So far, Echo (Eliza's character, obviously) has helped solve a kidnapping case in the role of a nearsighted negotiator with asthma, and been the victim in a hideously slow interpretation of "The Most Dangerous Game."

Admittedly the acting is at least good; Dushku does a great job as an emotionless sack of meat, bones, and apathy. Take that as you will. I just wish they all had better writing to work with. Every time an outsider tries to explain the Dollhouse in layman's terms and someone responds with something akin to "it's more complicated than that," I want to punch them (mostly because it really isn't).

What's left is a show that successfully manages to be condescending to its audience, continually takes one step forward and two steps back in plot development, and contains many unique characters I can't force myself to care about.
 

scnj

New member
Nov 10, 2008
3,088
0
0
Whedon's shows tend to start slowly and build characters and plotlines over the course of the series. Things that don't make sense now might make sense later on.
 

Nerdfury

I Can Afford Ten Whole Bucks!
Feb 2, 2008
708
0
0
I must admit, it's not quite what I'm used to with Joss. I miss the witty repartée between characters and the familiar humour. I have a feeling that the actors aren't as familiar or friendly with one another, because there's not the same cohesion that the actors and characters had in Dr. Horrible or Firefly.

I have a feeling that Joss had to make some concessions with the network to get this in, which is strange, because you'd think after the fallout from canning Firefly, any network executive would be clawing at the chance to pull the money and ratings from Whedon fans.

But I like it so far. I think all your nitpicks will either be resolved in time, or you'll just harden your little ball of dislike for the show.
 

rryyann

New member
Aug 4, 2008
28
0
0
I've read good and bad things about the show, personally I love it. I think it has the right amount of balance so that if you follow it there is a plot line, but also if you just catch one episode you can kind of get what is going on. Everyone in the FBI knows what it is but only one person believes it because it's one of those myths, everyone knows who Big Foot is, but not everyone believes in it.
I think the Acting is amazing, especially Dushku, every episode she has to create a completely different character, so she can't just be good at acting one way, like many actors are, she has to have everything. I also hope the Echo will start remembering things and questioning what is actually happening.
Over all, Whedon is amazing, and I know he'll think something amazing up.
 

Lvl 64 Klutz

Crowsplosion!
Apr 8, 2008
2,338
0
0
I actually probably should have mentioned in the end that there is something about the show that's keeping me interested. But then I thought it might just be my addiction to television period. And yes, that comment about Dushku was meant to be purely a joke, I find her acting in the show to be amazing.

I certainly am willing to admit the quality of a show can change in the blink of an eye, so I'm willing to work with this show. The plot has potential, I just haven't been too pleased with the way the show constantly seems to shove the fact we have no idea what's going on in our faces, instead of providing gentle reminders that there's more to everything than what's on the surface.
 

Nerdfury

I Can Afford Ten Whole Bucks!
Feb 2, 2008
708
0
0
Lvl 64 Klutz said:
I actually probably should have mentioned in the end that there is something about the show that's keeping me interested. But then I thought it might just be my addiction to television period. And yes, that comment about Dushku was meant to be purely a joke, I find her acting in the show to be amazing.

I certainly am willing to admit the quality of a show can change in the blink of an eye, so I'm willing to work with this show. The plot has potential, I just haven't been too pleased with the way the show constantly seems to shove the fact we have no idea what's going on in our faces, instead of providing gentle reminders that there's more to everything than what's on the surface.
Whedon is a master writer, so it confuses me as to why Dollhouse is written like it is. I will honestly admit to a little disappointment so far, but I'm reserving judgement until I've seen more. Probably at least half a season.
 

josh797

New member
Nov 20, 2007
866
0
0
you just reviewed a show with exactly 2 episodes shown. thats absurd. thats less time than fox gave firefly before they canned it. give it some time to develop then decide what you think
 

Pseudonym2

New member
Mar 31, 2008
1,086
0
0
Do the FBI not know about the Dollhouse or are the higher ups in on it? That's the only reason thy a multi-billion dollar operation could go unnoticed.
 

Frybird

New member
Jan 7, 2008
1,632
0
0
josh797 said:
you just reviewed a show with exactly 2 episodes shown. thats absurd. thats less time than fox gave firefly before they canned it. give it some time to develop then decide what you think
It took Fox only three episodes to kill "Drive" (A show by Firefly/Dollhouse Producer Tim Minar (sp?) about a cross country road race in the style of Cannonball or Rat Race, just a bit darker, would've loved to see where they going with that).

That said, i have doubts that Dollhouse will see more than maybe one full season, given that it is placed on that timeslot where Fox-Sci-Fi goes to die and it is a not-so-easy concept.

I definitly saw improvement in the second episode, mostly because they set up stuff for the overall story arc (the story about the "most dangerous game" was...watchable, but well, not much more), but it still has to get better right now.

The concept of Dollhouse is a big challenge for the writers (having to write storys in all sorts of styles and genres while still keeping a consistent feel PLUS making a character symphatic that is literally blank) and the female lead (playing all sorts of different characters and make them believable). And that said, Dollhouse COULD BECOME A AMAZING SHOW...but right now, it seems more likely that it will fail badly.
 

hippo24

New member
Apr 29, 2008
702
0
0
I disliked Dollhouse, I found its premises to be to ridiculous and far-fetched to enjoy.
But then again things like 24, Firefly, Serenity and Stargate are favorites for me, so maybe I just have bad tastes.
 

scnj

New member
Nov 10, 2008
3,088
0
0
I'm willing to give them time to find their flow. I'm sure as the series progresses and the writers get more used to the characters things will start to come much more naturally. Hopefully, Fox will think the same.
 

TheDustyBanana

New member
Feb 8, 2009
386
0
0
I was kinda expecting a show along the lines of Buffy, Angel, or Firefly being that is a Joss Whedon production but it's entirely different. I wouldn't mind giving it a shot with at least watching most if not all of the first season, but so far it's not too interesting so I don't know how far I'll make it.
 

PedroSteckecilo

Mexican Fugitive
Feb 7, 2008
6,732
0
0
Despite being a fan of Whedon, the premise is uninteresting to me... but then again, I initially thought Firefly was just an Outlaw Star Ripoff, I was certainly wrong about that and I could be wrong about this as well.
 

porpoise hork

Fly Fatass!! Fly!!!
Dec 26, 2008
297
0
0
it will prolly be one of those shows like buffy, charmed or angel that like the energizer bunny just keeps going.. and if we come across an episode 5 or 6 years from now we wonder how in the hell has the show managed to stay on the air for that long.
 

SebbeG

New member
Feb 23, 2009
13
0
0
actually if you look back on the first season of buffy it's really not as good as the rest of them when we had gotten to know the characters. the first season is not as bad as season 4, worst season of them all except for the episode Hush which is just awesome in every way and a few key moments in some episodes, i.e willow turning gay and becoming more powerfull. the whole initiative storyline just sucked for me and i didn't find it as good as the rest of the main plotlines in the other seasons. anyway, give this a season or two and i think we'll see a more developed show than it is right now. that said i loved the second episode but the first one was just the introduction so i wasn't as fond of that but i still liked it.

if you're gonna say look at angel which was great from the beginning i'll say that angel was already a developed character and so was cordy and wesley. the only one not developed in early season one was doyle, the best character ever to appear on the show in my oppinion, and he was only in it for 9 eps and still rocked every second of it.

firefly is awesome from the start by the way and i'm not sure why that is. it was fresh, hade great acting and i guess i'm just a sci-fi geek so i love it.
if you look at the mans track record you guys have nothing to worry about. 7 seasons of buffy which continues in the graphic novels, 5 seasons of angel also continued through a graphic novel, 9 aired eps of firefly due to stupidity from the network execs and we all know how that turned out cause the fans got serenity. even if this season isn't that great we have to give it a chance to grow and see how it turns out when the main story really kicks off...
 

nekolux

New member
Apr 7, 2008
327
0
0
A lot of whedon's shows are slow starters. I'm not being a fanboy here but if you've seen the firefly dvd extras. They were explaining why they chose a slower and lengthier pilot rather than the train job. They want to slow get you to know how all the characters work, the basic plot outline etc.

However being a good little summer glau fanboy... this show needs more of her =P