Double Standards You Allow

Recommended Videos

Robert Marrs

New member
Mar 26, 2013
454
0
0
erttheking said:
Reiper said:
I can appreciate that men have to deal with crap that women don't. Which is why I never commented on anything regarding them, the point of my post was merely to say that feminism wasn't done. I never even brought up MRA.

And no offense but there are still major problems regarding the treatment of women in our society. Someone found some statistics that I wish I could find and have spent a good chunk of my time looking for, but in more red states sex education is abysmal, to the point where a lot of men and women think nothing of situations that can legally be defined as rape.

That is not really an equal treatment issue. Men suffer from a lack of sex education just as much as women do. Its a problem but its not one that feminism is going to fix. Sex education in red states is a direct result of deeply ingrained religious beliefs not some hatred for women. I suppose you could argue that religion in itself is misogynistic but the answer to those problems is to remove the ideologies power in government not just add another one. I fail to see how feminism will help with that or even abortion for that matter which is largely a result of the same issue.
 

Riot3000

New member
Oct 7, 2013
220
0
0
No can there not be MRA vs Feminism thing because that will just take the double standards thing way off into something else.

The thing see is the these double standards can cut both ways the slut\stud nonsense and for some reason society is still entrenched in a lot of traditionalism. For example working women and stay at home dads still get a lot of flack for faults that are not nearly as common the other way around. A working dad will not get flack for forsaking his family and stay at home mom will get more support for her choice than people vilifying it.
 

Phasmal

Sailor Jupiter Woman
Jun 10, 2011
3,676
0
0
I really can't think of much to put here.

I mean, there's double standards and then there is social context, which is why sometimes its okay for one person to do a thing but not another. I mean, some of that context is dumb, but other bits of it aren't.

I'm sure I'm not double-standard free but I can't think of any that I'm okay with. Probably because the things I'm okay with wouldn't seem to be double-standards?
 

Aramis Night

New member
Mar 31, 2013
535
0
0
erttheking said:
Aramis Night said:
erttheking said:
cypher-raige said:
Vault101 said:
Feminism came about in reponse to a very REAL inequality between men and women..which still exists in certain ways today (and afects men too)

MRA came about on the very shakey notion that men (straight white men more specifically) are somhow the opressed ones in our society
Feminism's job is largely done and has little value in modern society. MRA never has much value to begin with.
The best thing to do is to teach equality and equality of opportunity without the baggage of either group.
Wage gap, slut shamming, unequal representation in media, sexual harassment, people struggling to make abortion illegal, a movement where women are being told that it's her fault if she gets raped. Oh yeah, and the fear of being raped, even if you're in the armed forces.

Feminism is far from done.
/sigh. Here we go again.

Wage Gap: 70% wage gap debunked years ago by the Consad report commissioned by the US dept. of labor: http://www.consad.com/index.php?page=an-analysis-of-reasons-for-the-disparity-in-wages-between-men-and-women

Slut Shaming: Done at least as much by women as men. General society on the other hand actually rewards "slutty" behavior. Rather lucrative career opportunities are available for women who choose to take advantage of this as well as potential fame. Society in fact seems very willing to reward women more for engaging in "slutty" behavior than it does to condemn it.

Unequal representation in XXXX: This is a natural outcome when you provide people with choice. The only way to change this would be to take choice away from people on both sides of this equation. I would not be so willing to argue for a quota system to replace our ability to make choices for ourselves. As for media in particular, women are rather a large market for the consumption of media which makes them complicit in any consequences brought about by them making the choice to consume certain media over others.

Sexual Harassment: Is Illegal. Full Stop. Nothing more can be done. Penalties are already draconian enough to compel most companies to hire legal specialists and enforce zero tolerance policies.

People struggling to make abortion illegal: The key word here is struggling. The Anti-abortion position is a dead end political ticket whose political usefulness is coming to an end. The numbers of people to whom this sounds like a good idea are dropping and will continue to. I will continue to be among the most vocal supporters for abortion. This is not even a strictly feminist issue as it does impact men as well.

A movement where women are being told it's her fault if she get's raped: If this is a matter of course, then that is repellant in the extreme. Where is this movement? Who are it's representatives? How large?
I was able to find a source that disagrees with this, so I think it goes without saying that whether it exists or not is, at the very least, debatable.

http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/womens-earnings-and-income

That's because it's so heavily engrained into society. Plenty of women in the middle east heavily support sexist cultural norms in countries where they are present, last semester I even read a work written by a woman from one of those countries who talked about how while many women were against being forced to wear vales, just as many supported it. When people grow up in a country where less than what some people would call healthy attitudes are prevalent, they come to accept it, even if they are hurt by it. Not so much here in America (Which is all I can really speak for). Sure economic America loves sluts but moral America hates sluts. There's a pretty big divide here. Sure, plenty of people who are slutty can make money, but that comes at a price at a good chunk of the country hating them for being "immoral"

I'm pretty sure there are ways to fix it without taking away choice, mainly by making desires for better representation heard and supporting works that do it well. Like Fallout New Vegas. Female characters, ethnic characters, LGBT characters, and characters with mental disorders.

Yes it is illegal, but I'm not sure if we've reached the peak of what we can do. There's a lot more to stopping something than just saying it's illegal, an action won't stop just because it's illegal if the mindset behind it isn't gone, just look at Prohibition in America. The problem with sexual harassment is that a lot of times it gets swept under the carpet, mainly with flimsy excuses like "she was asking for it" or "if you didn't want it why didn't you do anything" when the woman was rooted to the spot with fear. Also I've heard people say that some people with the "boys will be boys" mindset don't tell their sons to keep their hands to themselves. We could work to fix that.

This is true, but the people who are fighting for it are still managing to due some serious damage, including making it extremely hard to get an abortion, having doctors give women false information about abortions to discourage them, and arranging kidnappings of women who were going to get abortions.

http://news.yahoo.com/scariest-anti-abortion-tactic-ever-kidnap-women-seek-231445252.html

Movement was a poor choice of word on my part. The point I was trying to make is that when a woman is raped she faces a very good chance of being blamed for it. One person on this very website even said something to the effect of "If a woman is stupid enough to get herself raped" and that's all I read before I clicked away in disgust. Universities in particular like to sweep it under the rug so that their image isn't hurt, and in the army superiors often take advantage of their position to sexually assault their juniors, getting away with it because they're friends with the right people (Although to be perfectly fair in the military this is a massive problem with men as well._
Your source(http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/womens-earnings-and-income) has a number of problems in terms of methodology. It lumps both genders together as a block and makes comparisons based on that in almost ever case. At no point is a breakdown of hours vs. wage presented. Given the existence of overtime which is never addressed at any point in the article. Simply lumping groups together as part or full time does not in any way accurately reflect the amount of labor vs. wage. Comparisons are never presented in terms of the same positions and experience, just fields. Given the tendency of women to choose quality of life benefits over raw wages, it seems rather likely that much of this discrepancy is the result of the tendency of men to work far more overtime as well as value wage/salary amount over benefits. This was outlined in the Consad report.

As for "moral America" hating sluts. If your hoping for porn actresses to be respected for example, you cannot enforce that without again taking away people's choice to their own opinion's.

To address your point about sexual harassment. If making it illegal is not a strong enough societal condemnation of a problem, then nothing ever will be. Much like murder, no matter how much we come down on offenders there will still be those who offend. You will successfully eradicate harassment the moment that you successfully snuff out the last human being.

As for people making light of incidents, I suspect that it is largely because we have made the penalties so draconian for such events that the harm to the victims is considered so much less than the penalties would be on the perpetrator that people are reluctant to ruin people's lives over someone being made uncomfortable. If the penalties were more in line with the harm committed then perhaps people would be more willing to condemn those behaving inappropriately without worrying about feelings of guilt associated with ruining some guys career over stepping outside socially acceptable lines. I'm not saying this to defend people who go around groping co-workers. That far over the line deserves some harsh penalty. But Zero tolerance policies don't lend to comfortable work environments. I need only point to Dongle-gate as an illustration of what I'm referring to.

No one on this forum is a bigger fan of abortion than myself. I regret that I was unable to get access to the requisite education or I would be performing one right now instead of simply talking about them. The alarmist article was an extreme suggestion. There is no evidence that anything of that nature has actually occurred and if it did, that would be grounds for serious criminal charges. If anything, it is a sign of just how desperate the anti-abortion side is getting. I read the remainder of your article and it had some illustrations of how far they are reaching to keep the inevitable from coming to pass. These are all incredibly temporary measures that are going to be overturned. They are a regrettable nuisance... for now.

I have yet to have a negative experience happen to me at any point in my life that the mention of wasn't at some point met with the possibility being brought up that I could have done something to prevent it, including being raped. And on some level, this was true in every case. It's only offensive if your arrogant enough to feel the world owes you safety or to keep the confidence of our trust. We simply do not live in that kind of world. The world is a mix of both good and bad people.

Universities simply don't like to advertise themselves as magnets for sexual assault or rape, so they have a vested interest in dealing with instances internally. Of course they are not set up correctly for legal preceding's or to carry out penalties beyond expulsion. I agree that they should not be in the business of pretending to arbitrate legal matters, especially if they are not prepared to operate to the same legal standards found in a courtroom.

The military I will make no excuses for.
 

Daymo

And how much is this Pub Club?
May 18, 2008
694
0
0
Oh man this went off the deep end fast, any way double standards I allow are I'll take a lot more positive view on the same actions taken by my friends compared to the same action taken by people that annoy me. Case in point gender debates, when I have them with friends or friends have them with others I find them funny, when other people I know have them they piss me off to no end
 

chikusho

New member
Jun 14, 2011
873
0
0
When a satirist says racy things, it's to point out how ridiculous some people are.
Satire is supposed to be a lens that enhances and lays bare hypocrisy for what it really is.
When a satirist says something that could be considered awful, he's not saying something awful. He's making fun of people who actually believe what he's saying is true.

I don't think that's a double standard.
 

Flutterguy

New member
Jun 26, 2011
970
0
0
Guns. I hate that people use them as toys. I hate how easy they are to acquire.

But when some guy in an f150 is literally trying to make me crash because I was so audacious to make a right turn before he got to the intersection and now he can't go 140 km/h with me in the way. This is about the time I wish I had a 45 caliber dick enhancer in the glovebox.