Dracula May C...I mean...Castlevania Lord of Shadows.

Recommended Videos

chinangel

New member
Sep 25, 2009
1,680
0
0
I HATE the story in this game. hate with a capital H. The gameplay is AMAZINGLY fun. But the story has little or nothing to do with Castlevania itself.

You play as Gabriel Belmont, oh but he isn't actually a Belmont; he was orphaned in front of the most hilariously useless order of...something? They call themselves The Broterhood of Light (cliche) yet one of the founders was a woman.

Gabriel Belmont uses The Combat Cross which later is dubbed Vampire Killer by a bunch of hillbilly peasants, because it can kill vampires. But..it also kills trolls, werewolves, Titans a dragon at one point, and various other undead...so that automatically makes me roll my eyes.

The Levels are extremely linear, but this isn't a bad thing, though a lot of old-school gamers are used to the exploration-based Castlevania, this isn't bad. Levels can be fun, and this game proved it.

Gameplay:
Okay, this is where the game really shines. Combat is excellent and flowing, although a good half of your moves are fairly useless by the time you can afford them because enemy's don't always flinch, letting them interupt your combo's, so you'll probably find yourself using a lot of the same moves over and over again.

Still that aspect of the game is fun. The sub weapons are, like the main combat system, half useless. You get 4 sub-weapons: a Dark Crystal (couldn't you come up with a better name?) Fairy's, Holy Water and Silver Daggers.

The Only REALLY useful weapons are the Dark Crystal and The Holy Water. The Other two are largely useless.

Music:
Truly beautiful, though mildly repetive at times. However I can't really complain as the chants and heavy Gothic theme is realized in a treat to the ears. However...Vampire Killer NEVER plays. Not once, and not even a rendition of it.

Storyline:
Where Do I begin?

SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS!! YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!

This game has NO similarities to a game about Killing Vampires. The vampire level pops in about halfway through the game in a castle that I suppose is supposed to be Castlevania, but isn't. It has all the trademarks of Castlevania; the inside changes arbitrarily, it has a clockwork tower, it has a freakish science laboratory and so on and so forth.

However, it isn't acknowledged as Castlevania, the Throne room (The ONLY place that never changes) is nothing like the throne room we know it to be, and oh yes: it has Portal "Cake is a Lie" requisite joke (which had NO business being there. it was purely a throw-away joke)

Second. The Vampire Killer (not the whip, the song) as I said earlier, does NOT play. Never. This is the THEME of the game. It's a readily recognizable theme song that plays in every Castlevania and it isn't present!

Thirdly: The game is about Dracula, ultimately. THAT is who you're looking forward to. That is what the game is building up to.

GUESS WHO ISN'T IN THE GAME!?

He makes ONE cameo appearance in the final cinema, which felt forced and contrived and had absolutely no relevance to the story whatsoever. It felt totally out of place, especially when they tried to make him 'sympathetic'. But here's the thing...HE'S THE LORD OF DARKNESS! Dracula ISN'T supposed to be sympathetic! Now I don't mind re-imagining him, but this makes no sense whatsoever!

Instead, who do we get for a final boss?

Satan.

The fucking Devil. it's NOT epic, it's stupid. Especially since he's easily the easiest fight in the whole game. Bar None. The easily, pushover battles come at the very end of the game, battles that should be hard! Battles that should test your skills, and I beat them all before lunch.

So ultimately? The story is extremely weak, it has nothing that's unpredictable (except for the devil bit).

I did not enjoy the story of this game, and I doubt many other castlevania fans will as well. No Vampire Killer, No Dracula, No Castlevania.

Oh and you can turn Gabriel Belmont into Solid Snake if you beat the game on progressive difficulties.

OVERALL OPINION:

This game is okay...but it has little bearing on the actual Castlevania storyline. I'd say it was a prequel based on the last cinema, but even then it doesn't make much sense as Dracula already had a story, and this guy wasn't part of it, AND the final Cinema isn't explained in the slightest.

So, get it if you enjoy a challenge, but if you're expecting a Castlevania story; I'd avoid it.
 

Haxxident

New member
Jun 9, 2010
18
0
0
I can see your passionate about the game, i have never played a Castlevania game before so I dont fully understand your comparison's. An enjoyable read but seems more like a rant.
 

Mr. Omega

ANTI-LIFE JUSTIFIES MY HATE!
Jul 1, 2010
3,902
0
0
So it's a regular game about killing monsters with the name Castlevania slapped on? That's what I gather from this review, and it's exactly what I was afraid this game would be.
 

RowdyRodimus

New member
Apr 24, 2010
1,154
0
0
It's a reboot of the console Castlevania games, hence why Dracula appeared like he did and the castle wasn't as it was in the other games.

This part isn't about this review, but it seems that people want from Castlevania what they complain about SEGA doing with Sonic, reamking the same game time after time. With Sonic it's Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 and with Castlevania all the fans just want yearly remakes of Symphony of the Night. Every handheld game has been just a different version of it since the GBA and from what I understand they will still follow that (convoluted IMO) storyline and the consoles will follow the new one.

The 3D games have sucked and so they decided to try a different thing with the series by having two seperate timelines so you don't have to follow both the handheld and console games. Actually that's the strategy Squareenix should've followed with the Kingdom Hearts series seeing as you need 3 seperate systems to get the whole story.

With the power that modern consoles have it's a waste to make a new Lament of Innocence or Symphony of the Night type game on them. If the reboot sticks (that's the main thing) then it will be great to get a coherent storyline from them tracing the legacy of the Belmont family. The way it is now, we have thirty different character from all points in history introduced willy nilly (that is actually the first time I have ever used that term lol) with the dates of the games going like 1092, 1744, 1922, 2016, 1831, 1924, etc... It's just too hard to follow.

I did get tired of hearing Patrick Stewart sounding like he was reading a shopping list every chapter knowing that they probably spent millions to get him to do it (one of my problems with getting A list actors to do voice work and raising production costs unneccesarilly). I also didn't care for the music and wished it had a camera contol. Other than that I love the game. Sure it took cues from other games, but remember, nothing is new since everthing has been done before and will be done again. It didn't feel like Symphony type Castlevania but it felt like what they originally wanted from the 2D games but were limited by hardware at the time.
 

draggt

New member
Oct 10, 2010
2
0
0
"Gabriel Belmont uses The Combat Cross which later is dubbed Vampire Killer by a bunch of hillbilly peasants, because it can kill vampires. But..it also kills trolls, werewolves, Titans a dragon at one point, and various other undead...so that automatically makes me roll my eyes."

The hillbilly peasants as you call it named it that because he saved them from the vampires. And secondly, The vampire killer did not kill other monsters in the othergames as well?? I do not get your comment.


"Second. The Vampire Killer (not the whip, the song) as I said earlier, does NOT play. Never. This is the THEME of the game. It's a readily recognizable theme song that plays in every Castlevania and it isn't present!"

Your 100% wrong it is in the game...Either your blinded by your rage of the story of the game changing or you did not make it that far yet but the theme IS in the game.

"The Only REALLY useful weapons are the Dark Crystal and The Holy Water. The Other two are largely useless."

Daggers and Fairies are not useless? Maybe Fairies I could almost agree but I use them all the time.

"I did not enjoy the story of this game, and I doubt many other castlevania fans will as well. No Vampire Killer, No Dracula, No Castlevania."

"Dracula ISN'T supposed to be sympathetic! Now I don't mind re-imagining him, but this makes no sense whatsoever!"

Last time I remember at the end of SOTN he was semi sympathetic...

I am a Caslevania fan and I loved this game. Again Vampire killer IS in the game.

"But even then it doesn't make much sense as Dracula already had a story, and this guy wasn't part of it, AND the final Cinema isn't explained in the slightest. "

The last part is the only thing I agree with in your review. I would go back and play the game to find your "Vampire Killer" Song :).

"The fucking Devil. it's NOT epic, it's stupid. Especially since he's easily the easiest fight in the whole game. Bar None. The easily, pushover battles come at the very end of the game, battles that should be hard! Battles that should test your skills, and I beat them all before lunch."

Lol ok I agree with this a little. He kinda reminded me of a blood elf off of WoW. sadly...


Now for my very very short review.

The Game does pan away from the Castlevania story. And I am sure you will have haters Castlevania fan or not. But overall this game is very enjoyable. Ill give you my Rating system

Story:8.6
Music:9.1
Gameplay:9.5
Fun Factor:8.9

Over all....9.0.
 

Caradinist

New member
Nov 19, 2009
251
0
0
chinangel said:
I HATE the story in this game. hate with a capital H. The gameplay is AMAZINGLY fun. But the story has little or nothing to do with Castlevania itself.

Storyline:
Where Do I begin?

This game is okay...but it has little bearing on the actual Castlevania storyline. I'd say it was a prequel based on the last cinema, but even then it doesn't make much sense as Dracula already had a story, and this guy wasn't part of it, AND the final Cinema isn't explained in the slightest.

So, get it if you enjoy a challenge, but if you're expecting a Castlevania story; I'd avoid it.
Hold on just a second. You talk about how the hillbilly peasants (Wygol Village by the way, it's a nice reference) call it the Vampire killer. They actually offered a reason why it's called the Vampire Killer!

How many Vampires do you actually encounter and kill in the original games? Besides Dracula himself? at the very best you can find one other than Dracula in like, two games.

This game is not just a prequel, it's a reboot to the earlier prequel (because the last one didn't make much sense), So there's a reason Dracula isn't in the game.
(In fact, in THAT same Prequel, Lament of Innocence, you don't fight Dracula as a final boss, you fight Death instead)

Oh, and the scene after the credits actually explained something.
In 1999, there's going to be a big, big battle where dracula finally gets vanquished, and the Belmont to do it is named Julius.

Don't you get it? The very same person that saved the world in the end becomes the Lord of Darkness, and it's the responsibility of the Belmont Clan to vanquish Dracula for the remaining centuries, and get rid of that horrible stain on the family ( that is until 1796-1999, where it appears no belmont can't interfere, which is the excuse Konami/IGA runs with they introduce non-belmont characters in hand-held games.

But it's bigger than that. Dracula finally wants to die.

I can't say it was the biggest twist since KOTOR, as i've always suspected this twist from the very beginning, but the modern setting was the biggest twist due to what i mentioned above

The final boss was fucking difficult!...Until you realize you actually have unlimited Light and Shadow magic in this one fight, because it's all about black vs white. Yes the final boss is a pushover, the same way damn near every boss is a push over once you know what you're doing.

Pan's Silver Warrior form
gave me some big trouble...until you realize you can actually block everything he can throw at you (save for one lunge attack that requires inhumane reflexes to block, you can instead double jump because his attacks are pattered) and you can eliminate him very quickly.
 

draggt

New member
Oct 10, 2010
2
0
0
This game didnt really feel like god of war to me...Dantes inferno felt like god of war. This game more felt like Castlevania lol.
 

chinangel

New member
Sep 25, 2009
1,680
0
0
draggt said:
"Gabriel Belmont uses The Combat Cross which later is dubbed Vampire Killer by a bunch of hillbilly peasants, because it can kill vampires. But..it also kills trolls, werewolves, Titans a dragon at one point, and various other undead...so that automatically makes me roll my eyes."

The hillbilly peasants as you call it named it that because he saved them from the vampires. And secondly, The vampire killer did not kill other monsters in the othergames as well?? I do not get your comment.


"Second. The Vampire Killer (not the whip, the song) as I said earlier, does NOT play. Never. This is the THEME of the game. It's a readily recognizable theme song that plays in every Castlevania and it isn't present!"

Your 100% wrong it is in the game...Either your blinded by your rage of the story of the game changing or you did not make it that far yet but the theme IS in the game.

"The Only REALLY useful weapons are the Dark Crystal and The Holy Water. The Other two are largely useless."

Daggers and Fairies are not useless? Maybe Fairies I could almost agree but I use them all the time.

"I did not enjoy the story of this game, and I doubt many other castlevania fans will as well. No Vampire Killer, No Dracula, No Castlevania."

"Dracula ISN'T supposed to be sympathetic! Now I don't mind re-imagining him, but this makes no sense whatsoever!"

Last time I remember at the end of SOTN he was semi sympathetic...

I am a Caslevania fan and I loved this game. Again Vampire killer IS in the game.

"But even then it doesn't make much sense as Dracula already had a story, and this guy wasn't part of it, AND the final Cinema isn't explained in the slightest. "

The last part is the only thing I agree with in your review. I would go back and play the game to find your "Vampire Killer" Song :).

"The fucking Devil. it's NOT epic, it's stupid. Especially since he's easily the easiest fight in the whole game. Bar None. The easily, pushover battles come at the very end of the game, battles that should be hard! Battles that should test your skills, and I beat them all before lunch."

Lol ok I agree with this a little. He kinda reminded me of a blood elf off of WoW. sadly...


Now for my very very short review.

The Game does pan away from the Castlevania story. And I am sure you will have haters Castlevania fan or not. But overall this game is very enjoyable. Ill give you my Rating system

Story:8.6
Music:9.1
Gameplay:9.5
Fun Factor:8.9

Over all....9.0.
Okay let me explain my comments a bit.

Yes I was raging at the game, as I had just beat it, and I DID find the weird...mutiliated corpse of The Vampire Killer Song, as my brother noticed it being played by the music box. However why is the theme song of the game an easter egg? Also, it was so mangled that i keep my comment. The song wasn't in the game, at least not in any immediately recognizeable fashion.

As for the Whip, 'vampire killer'. Yes, nice nod of Wygol village, however Vampire Killer got its name for killing Dracula, not for killing random vampires.

Look, my review was half-rant and half review, and just reading it reminds me of all the disappointment I had for the game. It lacked the fundemental tags that identifies a Castlevania game, but they had enough time to stick in a stupid 'the cake is a lie' joke.
 

chinangel

New member
Sep 25, 2009
1,680
0
0
Caradinist said:
chinangel said:
I HATE the story in this game. hate with a capital H. The gameplay is AMAZINGLY fun. But the story has little or nothing to do with Castlevania itself.

Storyline:
Where Do I begin?

This game is okay...but it has little bearing on the actual Castlevania storyline. I'd say it was a prequel based on the last cinema, but even then it doesn't make much sense as Dracula already had a story, and this guy wasn't part of it, AND the final Cinema isn't explained in the slightest.

So, get it if you enjoy a challenge, but if you're expecting a Castlevania story; I'd avoid it.
Hold on just a second. You talk about how the hillbilly peasants (Wygol Village by the way, it's a nice reference) call it the Vampire killer. They actually offered a reason why it's called the Vampire Killer!

How many Vampires do you actually encounter and kill in the original games? Besides Dracula himself? at the very best you can find one other than Dracula in like, two games.

This game is not just a prequel, it's a reboot to the earlier prequel (because the last one didn't make much sense), So there's a reason Dracula isn't in the game.
(In fact, in THAT same Prequel, Lament of Innocence, you don't fight Dracula as a final boss, you fight Death instead)

Oh, and the scene after the credits actually explained something.
In 1999, there's going to be a big, big battle where dracula finally gets vanquished, and the Belmont to do it is named Julius.

Don't you get it? The very same person that saved the world in the end becomes the Lord of Darkness, and it's the responsibility of the Belmont Clan to vanquish Dracula for the remaining centuries, and get rid of that horrible stain on the family ( that is until 1796-1999, where it appears no belmont can't interfere, which is the excuse Konami/IGA runs with they introduce non-belmont characters in hand-held games.

But it's bigger than that. Dracula finally wants to die.

I can't say it was the biggest twist since KOTOR, as i've always suspected this twist from the very beginning, but the modern setting was the biggest twist due to what i mentioned above

The final boss was fucking difficult!...Until you realize you actually have unlimited Light and Shadow magic in this one fight, because it's all about black vs white. Yes the final boss is a pushover, the same way damn near every boss is a push over once you know what you're doing.

Pan's Silver Warrior form
gave me some big trouble...until you realize you can actually block everything he can throw at you (save for one lunge attack that requires inhumane reflexes to block, you can instead double jump because his attacks are pattered) and you can eliminate him very quickly.
well thanks for responding ^^ Now let me admit that I was half-raging and half reviewing.

Now, to explain my rational (because amazingly, I do have some) :p

Ah yes , my anger at the final cinema.

Yeah I know that he's Dracula, however this 'change' makes no sense. Sure patrick Stewart drones on about how Gabriel is 'becoming angrier and angrier and more of a monster' but this sin't shown in ANY fashion.

He kills monsters, he's polite to humans, and he shows genuine remorse at his actions, despite the fact that they were totally manipulated. Patrick stewart's character says some silliness about him having an 'inborn rage' but that's, again, never shown. In ANY capacity.

Even in the fight scene with the devil (god how stupid) he goes on and on about the love of god, he prays for forgiveness, he talks with his wife aabout how much he loves her and...AND THEN HE TURNS INTO THE LORD OF DARKNESS!?

WHY!?

It makes. No. Sense. It's never explained beyond the fact of: "Mr. Kojima decided to throw dracula in at the end here to say that Dracula WAS in the game'. Bullshit.

Also, this game has a giant gaping plothole that I just realized now.

His wife died, he's a vampire.

Soo....where did the other belmonts come from?

He had no offspring. Big. Plothole.

That aside, that final cinema just wreaked of wrong. He tries to bite Patrick Stewart despite the fact that his character should not only be quite dead (which is again, never explained) but is also a rotting corpse. He's Death for F's sakes! Why would a vampire bite and try to drain rotting, congealed blood? He only looks alive on the outside! And Dracula would know this! Makes. No. Sense.

As for the boss fights, I just found them stupidly easy. I died once to Satan and that's ONLY because I messed up his silly QTE (god that sounds stupid). The Silver Knight or wtv pan's war form is called was simple, the Dracolich was interesting and fun and gave me more trouble than Satan. Satan was...so easy. So so disappointingly easy.

I hope that clears things up a little more. ^^