Dragon Age : Origins - An utter disappointment ?

Recommended Videos

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,636
0
0
Yes the graphics aren't the best and the gameplay isn't overly actiony, but I still really enjoyed the game. The story was great and the gameplay elements that weren't that good never really got in the way of having fun for me. And mind you I played it on the Xbox.

I guess in the end it just wasn't to your taste or perhaps you went in expecting something else. The game's style obviously wasn't for you and I hope you find a game more to your taste.
 

Omikron009

New member
May 22, 2009
3,817
0
0
Graphics aren't really a huge part of a game, and the combat becomes very fun once the games becomes difficult enough for every decision to matter. Once you get lots of abilities and start fighting tough enemies, it's an absolute blast.
 

lulu_560

New member
Jul 13, 2010
9
0
0
The graphics where really shitty for me on PC when I first played Dragon Age, so I went into the settings and set it to high and it didn't make much difference, the only thing that made me play the game more was the mods that people put they're heart and soul into making

The combat was a bit cluster-fucked cause all the other characters kept getting in the sodding way stealing all the XP, leaving my character in the shits cause they wasn't lvling up

In order to hear the wisecracks and the gags, I had to run past a certain check point and if I didn't run past it with the right people in my party, I got a load of silence, as if the game was throwing a tantrum and if I didn't run through that check point for the entire game, the something weird would happen in the next fight like the characters walk animation would fail and they'd all glide along like bumpable bleeding ghosts

That said and done, EA are money eating zombies that are feeding off our brains.....and our wallets
 

Captain Pirate

New member
Nov 18, 2009
1,875
0
0
s0m3th1ng said:
And our Office just trounces your boring escapades.
There's your problem. It was SUPPOSED to be boring. It was taking the piss of the boring and dreary British office workplace. Trust America to think something's too boring, and think it needs to be un-boring.

Blind Sight said:
Man, Bioware's Canadian.
Oh, well i sincerely apologize for my ignorance. Canada, I hope you never make anything related to American accented Dwarves ever again.
And America, I and two friends still hold our war threat.
 

FinalDream

[Insert Witty Remark Here]
Apr 6, 2010
1,402
0
0
I liked the games mechanics, a throwback to the Knights of the Old Republic era but the story was terrible, I just found it too cliche and contrived. Looking forward to the second game though. Hopefully we can get a good story with some originality next time.
 

Jimbo1212

New member
Aug 13, 2009
676
0
0
Jaranja said:
*Looks at time played*

Well, I've got over 100 hours played on it. It's not boring and is reminiscent of, although no where near as good as, Baldur's Gate.
Why would I carry on playing a game where the first few hours bore me to the point I thought I was becoming retarded?


Dangernick42 said:
I didn't think the graphics were that bad, sure they're not as good as say, Mass Effect 2, but I wouldn't really think of it as much of an issue. Now the gameplay being boring as hell, that's an issue...
The graphics are dire. The graphics for MS2 are far better, but again, not very good compared to what they should be. As I said, the game has such low spec's it could have easily been released mid 2006 - early 2007 and be maxed out.
 

Eduku

New member
Sep 11, 2010
691
0
0
TB_Infidel said:
Dangernick42 said:
I didn't think the graphics were that bad, sure they're not as good as say, Mass Effect 2, but I wouldn't really think of it as much of an issue. Now the gameplay being boring as hell, that's an issue...
The graphics are dire. The graphics for MS2 are far better, but again, not very good compared to what they should be. As I said, the game has such low spec's it could have easily been released mid 2006 - early 2007 and be maxed out.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
 

nYuknYuknYuk

New member
Jul 12, 2009
505
0
0
I loved it. The graphics sucked, but that wasn't what I played it for. It was really fun and addicting. I can't play it anymore because I did 2 or 3 playthroughs and am tired of it, but it was worth the 60 bucks. The DLC on the other hand....
 
Jul 9, 2010
275
0
0
I thought it was ok. Not great, but not terrible either, I only played a few hours worth but I enjoyed it. I particularly liked what they did with elves, making them a down-trodden ethnic group in a world of humans.
My biggest gripe is that it was always plugged as being a particularly dark RPG. It wasn't really, certainly no darker than Oblivion.
 

Hobbit in Denial

New member
Apr 28, 2010
27
0
0
I think it's a great game. It has one of the best character sets in any game ive ever played. Alistair and Morrigan are brilliant together. The storyline is brilliant and frankly, who doesn't want to play a game that has the possibility of the player character participating in a possible foursome with an elf, a female ship captain and a fit french bard. Graphics are a bit disappointing though.
 

Scde2

Has gone too far in a few places
Mar 25, 2010
33,805
0
0
I really enjoyed it, expect it did get repetitive at times.
I can see how people really dislike it.
 
Jul 9, 2010
275
0
0
Captain Pirate said:
Absolutely despised it. If it were a country I would've declared war on it by now.
Awful story I didn't care about, boring and disgusting looking game world, none too good graphics, and the talking, my dear God the TALKING. Fucking overdone. Yes, nice voice acting, I understand that, stop forcing me to listen to it! I want to play a game! Also, AMERICAN DWARVES. America.... just, no. This is too far. You've fucked up our Red Dwarf, our Life on Mars, our The Office, and now our Dwarves. You take the Inbetweeners and shitify it and me and two of my friends have vowed to declare war on you personally. /rant
The gameplay was significantly better than the rest of the game in that it was just alright. I liked the way it seemed like WoW, but condensed for the Xbox 360 controller.
It sounds to me like you need a hug and a firm slap on the wrist.
 

XT inc

Senior Member
Jul 29, 2009
992
0
21
I want to go out on a limb and say the 2400 ms point add on would add the technical color to the gameplay with new abilities or whatever but Ill be damned if I have to put anymore money after paying the 69.99 plus tax.

Now you know why no one bitched about borderlands dlc? Because they whipped their balls out and sold their game on launch for 39 bucks, so when you buy a couple of dlc packs you're still under what a new game costs entirely. they had the best game release and dlc model ever imo,
 

Jimbo1212

New member
Aug 13, 2009
676
0
0
Eduku said:
TB_Infidel said:
The graphics are dire. The graphics for MS2 are far better, but again, not very good compared to what they should be. As I said, the game has such low spec's it could have easily been released mid 2006 - early 2007 and be maxed out.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Not when it comes to graphics. All it comes down to is what hardware runs it, and with DA:O, archaic gpu's could run it.
Either way, this was one of many problems I found with the game. To be honest, if you want that style of gameplay, go play WoW. At least you play with other people rather then dealing with AI.
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
Most people, myself included, think you're flat out wrong about the majority of that. I liked the game, and the only real point I see is older graphics. I will give you that, however graphics are the number one thing that most gamers are willing to sacrifice, if it means more strengths elsewhere. Personally, I liked it better then Mass Effect.
 

Omnific One

New member
Apr 3, 2010
935
0
0
It wasn't bad; it wasn't great. The characters and conversations were the high point. Sadly, the visuals sucked (for lack of a better word), the story was a bit cliché, and the gameplay was uninteresting. It was suitably expansive in terms of scope, but the lack of a free world hindered it somewhat.
 

Goldeneye103X2

New member
Jun 29, 2008
1,733
0
0
Captain Pirate said:
You've fucked up our Red Dwarf, our Life on Mars, our The Office, and now our Dwarves. You take the Inbetweeners and shitify it and me and two of my friends have vowed to declare war on you personally.
There's rumours that they're going to make their own Doctor Who...

America, You've got House. That's the best TV doctor anyone could ever ask for. Why do you need Who as well?

OT: I considered getting it, until I looked at gameplay footage and realised that It was just Mass Effect, but not as good. I didn't even like Mass Effect too much...
 

Ren3004

In an unsuspicious cabin
Jul 22, 2009
28,357
0
0
I loved it. The combat seemed good enough to me. Maybe it depends on the class, but I was fine with my mage. The lack of voice for the main character did bug me, but the conversation system is fine. The lack of a traditional Good/Bad meter makes choices more interesting, as I don't feel the need to make a perfectly good or evil character, I can just pick the option I would choose. And it even has one thing over Mass Effect: a different button for skipping lines and for choosing options. In ME I accidentally chose the default option too often when I wanted to skip a line. And I couldn't care less about graphics, as long as the characters aren't all stickmen I'm fine with it.

So, that's my opinion.