You know, as someone who didn't like the design, I'd rather not.Reeve said:FFS, he shouldn't be apologising. What happened to artistic integrity? We live in a culture where people are eager to get offended about things. Well, I say to those people: Go fuck yourself.![]()
Senior obviouslyLifeCharacter said:Oh no no, the size of the staff isn't really the issue, it's the grinding of her ass on it just for the sake of the sexy pose that separates the Sorceress from the other, well endowed Necromancers.JemothSkarii said:Hmm, maybe it's just that image, but that seems to be about the right size for a staff...unless it has something to do with a gameplay video. Then I'd have to check it out myself. Thinking about it you could make anything into a pin-up, even say...George BushLifeCharacter said:snip.
And it really depends upon which George Bush you're referring to.
...And that my friends is the moral of the story. We don't need to ban the game. We don't need tens of hundreds of scoffing, snarling comments to the theme of 'feminazis' or 'sexist'. Or indeed stupid inflammatory article attempting to initiate flamewars.PunkRex said:We need more class in gaming politics.
Songblade said:This game looks kind of neat... I like the art style. A few characters of both genders are exaggerated - but nothing we haven't seen before. I also understand the difference between fantasy and reality.
The reality is, if it offends you and aren't into it, don't buy it. Same way I'm not into and don't buy firemen calendars.
People with a lot of free time on their hands and the ability to make people bad about themselves.Kelthurin said:Honestly, who is still offended by stuff like this?
That's bloody retarded.
I fucking reckon, that guy must sweat testosterone to grow a beard that manly. Look at that fucking thing!ANImaniac89 said:My God.....that beard.
I fail to see why he needed to apologize for that even.Fappy said:but the apology about the Facebook incident was much needed. The art style kind of reminds me of the old Conan book covers, but far more exaggerated.
We're going to get more of this "overt sexualization" card aren't we?Akalabeth said:The Sorceress design is not super terrible compared to some of the stuff out there, but that second pose? Come on man. Skeleton breast feeding? Conjuring staff between her cheeks? That's not about proportions. That's just overt sexualization. Cut that one of the mix and it would probably be fine more/less.
You didn't like it, so he had to apologize?erttheking said:We criticized him because he created something that we didn't like. When someone puts something out for the public to consume, it is open to criticism.Calamity said:Well Congrats internet, you just made a man apologize for creating the art he wants to create.
I really hate you.
Where did I ever say that? I never pointed a gun to the guy's head or demand that he apologize. That was his decision.Lovely Mixture said:I fail to see why he needed to apologize for that even.Fappy said:but the apology about the Facebook incident was much needed. The art style kind of reminds me of the old Conan book covers, but far more exaggerated.
We're going to get more of this "overt sexualization" card aren't we?Akalabeth said:The Sorceress design is not super terrible compared to some of the stuff out there, but that second pose? Come on man. Skeleton breast feeding? Conjuring staff between her cheeks? That's not about proportions. That's just overt sexualization. Cut that one of the mix and it would probably be fine more/less.
You didn't like it, so he had to apologize?erttheking said:We criticized him because he created something that we didn't like. When someone puts something out for the public to consume, it is open to criticism.Calamity said:Well Congrats internet, you just made a man apologize for creating the art he wants to create.
I really hate you.