Dumbest thing you've read online
- Thread starter hyperhammy
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Well it's not the dumbest thing ever(unfortunately) but I remember someone posting about some anti gaming article stating that gaming is addictive and will result in excess "boredom molecules" and that the child gamers will eventually resort to drugs to stave off the effects of said molecules. The replies she left to some of the comments were also pretty hilarious as well. Here's my favorite.
The woman who wrote the article says: "Some people take their opinions far too seriously, so much so that it renders them functionally illiterate."
An amused observer responds
and the woman who wrote the article responds
The woman who wrote the article says: "Some people take their opinions far too seriously, so much so that it renders them functionally illiterate."
An amused observer responds
I cannot believe that a woman with a functioning brain can sit and type such an ironic statement without feeling a tinge of doubt or self-reproach. Your article is nothing but an enraged opinion of a subject you've neither the will nor ability to understand. I apologize for the belligerent tone but you've got to get it through your skull that your vague emotions are not an absolute barometer of truth. They're certainly not worth executing someone over. But enough of my opinion; here are some recommendations for creating a "good" article' by current journalistic standards retracted to reflect your areas of greatest trouble:
Post sources for your claims, first of all. "New research shows.." is not a valid reference.
Second, discontinue the use of unquestionable absolutes. "Undoubtedly", "No one", and various axioms have no place in journalism. Perhaps as an opinion piece you'd be afforded more, but you've exceeded the reasonable limit. You come off sounding deluded and fanatical.
Third, loaded words and phrases such as "horrible" and "killing machine" detract from the perceived validity of the piece, and should be omitted. You'll hardly garner reasonable supporters if you appear emotional and illogical.
On a personal note, however, I must ask you to stop typing hateful diatribes. It discredits your cause, your self, and whatever writing skill you possess.
Post sources for your claims, first of all. "New research shows.." is not a valid reference.
Second, discontinue the use of unquestionable absolutes. "Undoubtedly", "No one", and various axioms have no place in journalism. Perhaps as an opinion piece you'd be afforded more, but you've exceeded the reasonable limit. You come off sounding deluded and fanatical.
Third, loaded words and phrases such as "horrible" and "killing machine" detract from the perceived validity of the piece, and should be omitted. You'll hardly garner reasonable supporters if you appear emotional and illogical.
On a personal note, however, I must ask you to stop typing hateful diatribes. It discredits your cause, your self, and whatever writing skill you possess.
You're the one who can't understand what they read. Not me. I've specifically replied to all the weak arguments presented by the likes of misguided and blind people like yourself. Half of what you said has already been covered, and you think I am the one being functionally illiterate? Do you know what that even means? It means you can't read because you're too wrapped up in yourself and your opinions. Snowblind. You're glazing over what I've written at best, due to your emotions, not mine. Case closed.
Jesus, shit like this just makes me wonder about modern society.Pokenator said:
(BWM) T-O-M said:
I have. Know what's makes it even better? She was a stripper!
OT: I don't know, probably when people flame you and then after all the shit is thrown they say "that's just my opinion"
Douches.
This. This is the dumbest thing I've read on the internet. I'm a Christian, so reading this made me ball over laughing!
"No, God's Penis is not a biological organ. I never said God's Penis was the same as man's penis. Obviously it wouldn't be. That is why I pointed out God has a Holy, Righteous Penis. That is to say, it's not the same as man's corrupted, fleshy one.
As I said when this subject first came up, once again: Penises are not just for sex & peeing. It is only because man is evil that he thinks of penises exclusively in those terms.
Man is made in the image of God the Father. That is the primary reason why man has a penis.
You cannot insert your evil prejudicial ideas of man's penis onto God - which is exactly what you are doing. God's Penis is not equal to man's penis. It's really not hard to understand."
Freakin Hilarious.
"No, God's Penis is not a biological organ. I never said God's Penis was the same as man's penis. Obviously it wouldn't be. That is why I pointed out God has a Holy, Righteous Penis. That is to say, it's not the same as man's corrupted, fleshy one.
As I said when this subject first came up, once again: Penises are not just for sex & peeing. It is only because man is evil that he thinks of penises exclusively in those terms.
Man is made in the image of God the Father. That is the primary reason why man has a penis.
You cannot insert your evil prejudicial ideas of man's penis onto God - which is exactly what you are doing. God's Penis is not equal to man's penis. It's really not hard to understand."
Freakin Hilarious.