Albetta said:
pulse2 said:
I think some people are missing a few things, CoD isn't everything and anything, yes its the most popular shooter, but that hasn't stopped other shooters doing well on PS3.
Resistance florishes online
Killzone flourishes online
MAG as far as I know still flourishes online, but it did in the first place which is the point
And these three are just examples outside of Battlefield and CoD, not everyone cares about CoD or Battlefield.
I understand that point made about cutting off PC eve fanatics, but its a double edged sword, the game exclusive to PS3 attracts PS3 owners to a game that would have otherwise gone overlooked (how many gamers on consoles care or know about eve?) and at the same time, it allows CCP to appeal to a diverse and new audience through different means.
As for Xbox people saying it would have been better on 360, how so? What's the difference? :/ Besides, you're talking about a console that has no real MMOFPS experience as of yet because of all its tedious restrictions.
And for those whining about control set up, FPS' have been on consoles for years now and no one has ever complained, why is this suddenly an issue?
I personally don't understand the cynical attitude towards the game, if its a good FPS, I'll be sure to pick it up, anything beats playing CoD, every boring man and his dog plays that game, so what if I'd prefer to play something different?
If you were referring to my OP, I understand that COD isn't everything, but allot of people don't. It's hard for FPS games these days because COD fanboys are quick to decry anything in first person as a "COD ripoff". It's sad really, allot of innovative games that aren't trying to be like call of duty get unfairly demerited because "Cod did this or that better".
That's my point and before that it was Halo this, halo that.
If the FPS genre is purely about CoD, then all other FPS developers might as well give up and take a shot in other genres or wait till CoD shoots itself in the foot and becomes pretty stale, that's already happening to Halo in my opinion, although they do add a bit here and there to keep it fresh, it just always seems like the same old same old, and I know that "what ain't broke..." but that's besides the point, its because the Tomb Raider devs took that mentality we are seeing a reboot and nothing annoys me more than stupid reboots of series that died because the developers got lazy and had dollar signs in their eyes, so kept milking the cow until it shrivelled up.
MAG wasn't a CoD, but it took a fresh spin, and for that I enjoyed it, Resistance and Killzone weren't Halo's, which is again, why I enjoyed them, I've already played countless Halo's, why would I want to play another monotonous one? I take the same attitude with CoD, I say good for you to all the people who see CoD as the be all and end all, but I'm bored of CoD, I'm bored out of my mind, there is only so much praising America and Britain as heros and the rest of the world as villains I can take and multiplayer isn't going to make that any less brain draining.
Dust may not be perfect, it may not be a CoD, but at the end of the day, as long as gameplay is fun, its glitch free and it looks interesting, you can count me in. Will I get MW3? Maybe, maybe not, I've already played MW, MW2 and Bops, how is this CoD any different apart from the campaign? -_- The only real pushing factor is that all my mates will be trading in their old CoD games to get the new one most likely, alas I won't be able to play against them. But if I have to keep buying new CoD games to keep up with my friends, I might as well find a new game altogether, make that my FPS of choice and meet new people.
I'm just making the point that people have to take a wait and see attitude before marking things down or up, people hyped Haze as a Halo killer and it flopped, people shrugged off Killzone 2 as a sequel to a lame supposed Halo killer and it did well, so lets not make rash assupmtions before we play the game.