250 dollars = 170 euros yet they are charging 250 euros? So basically the U.K and europe gets screwed on the price?
No, it just means that the connection online is through Wifi only with that model. Games can still be bought at brick and mortar retailers, and they're on flash cards.9_6 said:"Wifi only" wat.
Does that mean the games are download only?
no, its a rear touch pad, not a screen.Wicky_42 said:Wait, why on earth could you need a screen on the back of your console?! I mean, touch PAD perhaps, but a full-blown screen? Huh...Logan Westbrook said:...
Considering the amount of technology in the Vita, which includes front and back touch screens ...
But...Mr. Omega said:Let me repost and paraphrase something I said in a similar thread.
1: Even if the Vita beats the 3DS (which with each announcement is becoming less and less likely), it's not going to beat Nintendo. DS Lites, DSis and just plain regular DSs are still selling very well.
2: Once the 3DS gets it's main games out (and one the internet collectively realizes YOU CAN SHUT OFF THE 3D! God, that complaint annoys me...), the biggest complaint for the 3DS will be moot. Vita is getting new complaint-worthy things with each announcement (exclusive to AT&T, price, no 4G version, ect.)
And some other arguments:
3: If they want to get the 3G version, they'll likely have to keep paying AT&T for the 3G, and that version is even more expensive than the 3DS.
4: Superior hardware was the main selling point of the PSP. AND the PS3. Superior hardware is has not been serving Sony well...
5: By the end of the year, a lot of the major first party titles, along with a lot of third party titles will come out for the 3DS. So unless the Vita has the greatest launch line-up in the history of the industry, it's at a disadvantage right out the gate. Not so much a knock on the system (After all, the 3DS had a TERRIBLE launch line-up), but it might hurt initial sales.