I'm assuming you don't primarily speak English so I'll ignore that you gave me a headache with that terrible grammar.BiH-Kira said:You're funny. You actually believe that GS can force publisher.rasputin0009 said:Why would you support gamestop? They're not there to make your gaming experience any better. They've got such a stranglehold on the industry, that it forces the publishers to come up with new waus to get cash. Why do you think new games on steam still cost full price compared to retail? It's because gamestop threatens publishers that they won't stock their games if they sell for cheaper somewhere else. And also retail-exclusive content. Biggest villain for that bullshit would be gamestop, too. Fuck gamestop.CrossLOPER said:Can you personally explain to me this hate of GS? It does not seem that bad and I got the opportunity to purchase Fatal Frame 1,2 and 3 for about 30 dollars. The staff tried to push a subscription or something, but stopped after I said "no thank you". What did they do to you?Lur-King said:EDIT: I'd hate Gamestop over EA any day. And everyday.
EA, on the other hand, consistently uses practices that necessitate the creation and use of databases such as this:
http://www.drmdatabase.net/database
EDIT: Probably closer to 40, but still a good deal.
Games on Steam are full price because they can sell them at full price and earn more. If we magically remove GS, games would still be full price and maybe even worse. The Full price could increase because there is no competition with used games.
There is absolutely nothing that GS can do to force publisher to sell PC games at full price on Steam because GS hardly has any PC games. They can't say "We decrease the size of the PC game shelf" because there hardly is any shelf.
And they have no reason to threaten to decrease the shelf size of console games because Steam isn't competing with GS. So high sales on Steam wouldn't impact GS.
The "GS forces publisher to make DLC and increase prices" is a bullshit PR move from big publisher. GS is just a scapegoat, same as pirates and second hand sales. The big publisher make bad games and they will blame everyone that their 4 hour long, $60 game sold badly.
Publisher can live without GS. GS can't live without publisher. Anyone telling you otherwise is delusional.
Sure, GS can do some damage to the publisher, but at what cost? Going under? I can hardly see a capitalistic company going under for principle.
So you think that GS has no control? Don't they have somewhere close to 50% of the retail market for games? So if they told a publisher that they'll stop selling their games, the publishers wouldn't notice a 50% loss in sales? Gamestop has a lot of publishers to choose from and a huge market share to throw around. They have a lot of control.