I'd imagine the "contract" is for a few months/a year minimum, or there is some kind of penalty to avoid this.LaoJim said:That's really want I meant. Imagine a few years down the line, Mirror's Edge 2 is being released. A month before the release date you sign on for a month, spend one week each playing through Dragon Age 2, Need for Speed Rivals, Titalfall, and Battlefield Hardline (which are all now free and which you haven't yet played because you've been planning this for a while), claim your 10% discount on Mirror's Edge and then cancel. You get to play through 4 games for 5 dollars (providing you're dedicated enough/not bothered enough about completing them)KingsGambit said:You know what tho, that thought also occurred to me. Not the EA month, that's a horrid thought, but paying $5, playing your fill and breaking off cleanly at the end isn't a bad thing.
I didn't mean an official EA month, just a month you'd set aside to milk this deal for all its worth.
I think there are quite firm rules about exactly how difficult you can make it for one of your customers to unsubscribe. Sure you have to remember to do it in time and the button to do it might be tucked away somewhere difficult to find, but it should basically be the same process as Netflix (That said, EA is the game that made it impossible to give Dungeon Keeper any score but 5 stars so we'll see).Maximum Bert said:Somehow I doubt there will be an easily accessible cancel button for this signing up is probably easy canceling yeah theres a few hoops to go through because less people cancel if theres some effort involved.
I wasn't aware of the Season Ticket, yeah they do seem similar, the difference seems to be that the season ticket is just for Sports games whereas this seems to be FPS (i.e. Battlefield) + Sports games. Possibly EA will include lots of their other releases in it as well, probably they won't. I don't really know how EA sports games work these days (last one I had was FIFA 09) but there seems to be a large pay-to-win and get it before your friends focus on it.lnin0 said:Nothing more than a rebranding of the three year old "Season Ticket" which was $25 a year. EA raised the price by $5, extended the early access time from 3 to 5 days, dropped the discount 10% and tossed in some year old rentals to sweeten the mix. This seems like nothing more than a move to broaden the audience of Season Ticket.
I had a look at the terms and conditions and no, you can cancel it anytime you want. I think that's par for the course, people are more wary of getting locked into things. The onus is EA to provide a service that has enough content that people don't want to cancel. Given that the year contract is half the price of 12 monthly payments, I guess the idea is people will tend to go for the year.KarmaTheAlligator said:I'd imagine the "contract" is for a few months/a year minimum, or there is some kind of penalty to avoid this.
At the moment this hardly strikes me as being the best deal in the world, it doesn't seem like a total rip-off either. For fans who buy a certain number of EA games a year it represents value, for others it doesn't. If EA support the service with decent free games (not just nearly outdated sports titles) it might be worth doing, maybe not. I'd probably wait at least 6 months to see how its going. As you say there does seem to be this huge assumption (not unfounded) that everything EA does must be evil.major_chaos said:Its kind of sad just how rabid the anti EA mood is here, and how much it bleeds over into contempt for people who enjoy EA games.
As much as I want the hobby I enjoy to suffer greatly and risk complete collapse, it's not likely to happen.Nurb said:The next video game collapse can't happen soon enough
What? It's an option. They're offering a sort of plus membership as an option for people to buy. So it's something they're going to have to make worth the individual's time. Right now the four games is laughable. Maybe if they opened up their entire library or something then it would be a steal.InsanityRequiem said:http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/07/29/ea-announces-subscription-service-on-xbox-one-ea-access
Heard that correctly folks, EA is making a subscription program for the Xbox One. Monthly $5 or Annually $30 to play the games that EA says you can play. And it's on top of the $60 yearly Xbox Live Gold subscription. So now you'll be paying a few hundred for the system, $60 a year for online, and now an extra $30/$60 for EA games (If you don't buy them separately).
Looks to me that EA's trying to force "Games as a service" onto their consumers fully, with the Xbox One as the test bed.
I always thought it was the Always Online bullet that MS fired into its own foot regarding the Xbone, not subscriptions.Verlander said:The panning of XBone only delayed the inevitable.
You're not wrong, that was definitely one of my biggest issues. I reckon it was a mixture of everything though, but generally speaking the reaction seemed to me to be people unhappy with the console's reliance on online. I remember shortly after the PS3 was released, Sony mentioned that the PS4 would probably have no physical drive, and there was outcry against it (internet isn't good enough). Same thing happened when OnLive was launched in the UK, and the whole thing died (through various reasons). People don't like streaming games or subscriptions, but everyone else does, so I reckon it's going to seep in one way or another.Ed130 The Vanguard said:I always thought it was the Always Online bullet that MS fired into its own foot regarding the Xbone, not subscriptions.Verlander said:The panning of XBone only delayed the inevitable.