Again, I (as do the rest of us) understand that. No explanation neededrandomsix said:I'm not saying that it's the right thing to do. I'm just saying he is esoterically describing wage controls.Suiseiseki IRL said:I got that, but do you not see the problems with such a system?randomsix said:All he's proposing is that we set hourly wages for every job. He explains it in a roundabout and confusing manner, but his minutes/hours = money.
I suppose I should be more exact in what I was referring to and what I meant. You implied that his system had no physical capital, but it does (just as an economy of wage controls would have physical capital). My statement, due to the parenthesis in the other sentence, implicitly stated that it did. As far as opinions are concerned, I don't think such a system would work either.Suiseiseki IRL said:Again, I (as do the rest of us) understand that. No explanation neededrandomsix said:I'm not saying that it's the right thing to do. I'm just saying he is esoterically describing wage controls.Suiseiseki IRL said:I got that, but do you not see the problems with such a system?randomsix said:All he's proposing is that we set hourly wages for every job. He explains it in a roundabout and confusing manner, but his minutes/hours = money.