EDIT: No Russian

Recommended Videos

urilukin

New member
May 16, 2011
84
0
0
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
snip

i would not say thats a good thing, nothing good is accomplished when your army is cold hearted and lacks compassion what so ever.
No, but US soldiers cant live without a frickin poptart in their MREs (Generation Kill reference), while russians in general don't need that much to survive. Which is why they tolerated dictatorships and how they repelled every invasion.

Being a spoiled pussy doesn't accomplish anything either.
1. generation kill was shit and had such a slam against the war and the soldiers it was almost sickening.
2. Marines usually have to pay alot of this with their own money, and they signed up for some fucking hard training and have bullets shot at them and risk road side bombs on a daily basis in a fucking desert. you dont have room to call them "pussies" or "spoiled". just because russians are batshit insane doesn't mean a military HAS to be insane as well. after all, would you rather have insane soldiers that treated the populace like shit in the name of a dictator or Regular soldiers who have sympathy and actually help rebuild cities and supply medical equipment and other stuff?
and for the record, russians have had the highest death toll than most other countries since WW1, apparently they may be able to survive but not as well as you think.

also i find your generalization of Russians in pretty poor taste. Russians have emotions and their own style of coping with it. and i respect them for it. who am i too judge?

but in all honestly, the russian being the enemy in games is getting old.
Generation kill was shit?! what the hell are you talking about!?
generation kill had me going for two episodes, then it just became a mean spirited skewed version on the war (not saying it was sunshine a lolipops but good god!). Besides the guy who wrote it worked for rolling stone magazine, cant fucking stand them.
YEAH, HOW DARE THEY DEPICT THE WAR IN REALISTIC MATTER?! and why do you hate rolling stone? because of this: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-kill-team-20110327
 

Triple G

New member
Sep 12, 2008
484
0
0
White-Death said:
Okay, my friend once posted this in a forum, concerning Russia, and it was a very, say, anti-Russian thread.
I quote here:

''Don't worry, Cold war is over! you can stop hating peoples beliefs for no reason!''

Honestly though, if the US was portrayed like the way Russia is portrayed in MW3, the media would slaughter It, and how.
I was born & raised by 'EVIL' ex-commies who had to leave Russia because Mr.Goombenchav(Gorbenchav) & later Mr.Jeltsin sold the Russian (along with Ukranian) Economy to the west and plunged the country into the ground. When Putin restored some more communistic factors into the government, things calmed down a bit. Russia & Ukraine are still complete hellholes, though, those are types of countries that NEED a strict(Or Communist) government, just look at the state of the country.
You're kind of right here. For most Russians equality is more important than the right to vote. That's why socialism was and still is(communist party has ~25% of all votes) so big there. That's why they're trying to get a "rich-people-tax" through parliament right now. And that's the reason why Abramovich(Russian billionaire who obviously got all his money by stealing from the government in the 90s) was assigned governor of a northern "State" and had to pay for all the modernization out of his own fortune. That's why Berezovsky(a guy who stole 90 Millions from a partially state-owned air company, fled to London and made himself look like a "Kremlin-critic") is still wanted by the Russian Government.
Most Russian people(not all of course), just have a different mentality than Western people.
 

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
snip

i would not say thats a good thing, nothing good is accomplished when your army is cold hearted and lacks compassion what so ever.
No, but US soldiers cant live without a frickin poptart in their MREs (Generation Kill reference), while russians in general don't need that much to survive. Which is why they tolerated dictatorships and how they repelled every invasion.

Being a spoiled pussy doesn't accomplish anything either.
1. generation kill was shit and had such a slam against the war and the soldiers it was almost sickening.
2. Marines usually have to pay alot of this with their own money, and they signed up for some fucking hard training and have bullets shot at them and risk road side bombs on a daily basis in a fucking desert. you dont have room to call them "pussies" or "spoiled". just because russians are batshit insane doesn't mean a military HAS to be insane as well. after all, would you rather have insane soldiers that treated the populace like shit in the name of a dictator or Regular soldiers who have sympathy and actually help rebuild cities and supply medical equipment and other stuff?
and for the record, russians have had the highest death toll than most other countries since WW1, apparently they may be able to survive but not as well as you think.

also i find your generalization of Russians in pretty poor taste. Russians have emotions and their own style of coping with it. and i respect them for it. who am i too judge?

but in all honestly, the russian being the enemy in games is getting old.
Generation kill was shit?! what the hell are you talking about!?
generation kill had me going for two episodes, then it just became a mean spirited skewed version on the war (not saying it was sunshine a lolipops but good god!). Besides the guy who wrote it worked for rolling stone magazine, cant fucking stand them.
YEAH, HOW DARE THEY DEPICT THE WAR IN REALISTIC MATTER?! and why do you hate rolling stone? because of this: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-kill-team-20110327
1. you assume that IS the realistic depiction of war. A more realistic depiction is the thin red line or....the fucking news footage or stuff found on youtube all the time.
2. you assume that im bothered with individual articles as opposed to a biased perspective overall. Yes shit happens in war, yes we get a few bad eggs, but it shouldn't represent the majority. And why is it hating fox news is ok but hating rollingstone for similar reasons is a no-no? im entitled to my opinion. Besides its a music magazine dabbing in politics.
3. I find the characters insufferable and stereotyped which made me not care. That and it was so skewed, the trained marine in their mid twenties to early forties acted like asshole teenagers while the Iraqis were just short of perfect. My favorite seen is when they helped all the civilians carry their stuff down the road and they go and ruin it with a guy accidently getting the back of his head shot off.....classy. Im not even sure that happened to be honest. as a mini series it's just annoying and mean spirited and just hard to sit through. not to mention fairly forgettable.
 

Vonnis

New member
Feb 18, 2011
418
0
0
Russians are great for games. Why?
They're living humans, so have a realism edge over zombies, aliens etc. They also don't have the comically evil stigma of nazis, nor the historical limitations.
Everyone's already familiar with their old infantry waves, so seeing a horde of them running into an obvious death trap isn't just accepted, it's expected.
On the other hand, most people are also familiar with how hard core Russian military dudes (as well as criminals) can be, so they work just as well if you simply need a couple of highly skilled, ruthless professionals (with or without one token alcoholic).
They made some awesome technology, which of course means that if you're going to have a game with crazy tech, nobody is going to be surprised when it's Russian scientists who made said tech.
Russia itself is massive; you're going to have a hard time explaining how nobody noticed the massive tech labs and war factories in a densely populated country, but you almost expect there'd be a ton of crazy shit in Russia, not even particularly well hidden but remote enough that nobody realises it's there.
And finally, the Russians themselves seem to have exactly zero fucks to give about how games and other media portray them, so no need to worry about controversy.

Would I like to see some more variety? Sure. But I'm not the kind of politically correct dumbass that is offended because a game might potentially offend a group of people I don't belong to, even though that group of people doesn't seem to give a shit.
 

Shirokurou

New member
Mar 8, 2010
1,039
0
0
As a Russian, I can tell you this.
Russia is friggin undefeatable in any war which we didn't start ourselves.

Seriously, ask Napoleon or Hitler.

So all Russians view the anti-Russian FPS thing as a... "yeah they wish" and secretly all knowing that if what we'll pwn the hell out of the US.

Not to get on political shallow ice, but the 08.08.08 Russia-Georgia conflict actually had the Georgian side with American military training, advisors and equipment and they got overtaken pretty easily.

But again, nukes... the earth has them, so a Russia-US conflict is out of the question.
Besides, I see no reason to take over the US as a Russian. I like your entertainment stuff, you don't really have some kind of resource we want badly, so yeah.

Oh and in CoD and BF3 multiplayer, there are 2 teams. So half the time you're killing simple US soldiers for the glory of mother Russia.

That is all.
 

Aeonknight

New member
Apr 8, 2011
751
0
0
urilukin said:
AlphaEcho said:
tokae said:
AlphaEcho said:
The other one is a more modern version where you only have to have some shit storytelling and have WWIII. Cod went with that. Its not that they hate Russians, its just that Russians are the most convenient bad guy, despite them no longer being very powerful.
Your right in your reasonings, that's not the part I picked up on though since I agree with them.
But Russia actually is as strong as ever.. It's just that they keep to themselves and don't announce everything to the world. Sure the government is weak, very much so, but the army and the population at large..

I promise, I'm done de-railing this thread now!
Or almost..

Have everyone forgotten about China? I mean, if you have to go for a conventional enemy then that's atleast the first place I would look.
I still think that in the event of a third world war, it would be the US coallition versus Russia versus China (and probably North Korea, though their realations with China are not that good at the moment).
Russia and China are both pretty weak. The Russian military is very good at making them selves look good, but in actuality they have been a bit of a joke since the Cold War. Their air force and navy has never been anything too good, even in the war. Their soldiers themselves have very little discipline and many of them still use outdated equipment.

China is like that times eleven. Their navy and air force is almost non existent. They made an aircraft carrier you say? Look at how many we already have. Their equipment is almost entirely based around ancient ones used in the sixties. Their discipline and morale is almost zero and the only thing really going for them is the mass number of them.

Tell me, how would any of them even GET to America?
I don't want to get into the Russian military even thou a lot of what you said is incorrect but China?! they can pwn basically every military on earth even if the soldiers were armed with sticks just because of the sheer numbers!

p.s america also uses 1960s equipment(m16):3
Um... no.

First off the M16 has undergone changes since it's vietnam version to make it more reliable (so our troops would stop picking up AK's for being better...)

Second, China pwning everyone? that's a laugh. Know what was really good for dealing with mass infantry rushes? Land Mines. Which is why there's still hundreds of thousands of them out there unaccounted for.

Third, if you think size of the army is everything... Saddam thought the same thing. During Gulf War Iraq's army was what... the 4th largest in the world? And it got obliterated in a month.

I could go into further detail, but I already sound like your average "America Fuck yea!" idiot, so I'll stop while I'm ahead.
 

urilukin

New member
May 16, 2011
84
0
0
Shirokurou said:
As a Russian, I can tell you this.
Russia is friggin undefeatable in any war which we didn't start ourselves.

Seriously, ask Napoleon or Hitler.

So all Russians view the anti-Russian FPS thing as a... "yeah they wish" and secretly all knowing that if what we'll pwn the hell out of the US.

Not to get on political shallow ice, but the 08.08.08 Russia-Georgia conflict actually had the Georgian side with American military training, advisors and equipment and they got overtaken pretty easily.

But again, nukes... the earth has them, so a Russia-US conflict is out of the question.
Besides, I see no reason to take over the US as a Russian. I like your entertainment stuff, you don't really have some kind of resource we want badly, so yeah.

Oh and in CoD and BF3 multiplayer, there are 2 teams. So half the time you're killing simple US soldiers for the glory of mother Russia.

That is all.
What do you mean YOUR entertainment stuff? i am also Russian.
 

urilukin

New member
May 16, 2011
84
0
0
Aeonknight said:
urilukin said:
AlphaEcho said:
tokae said:
AlphaEcho said:
The other one is a more modern version where you only have to have some shit storytelling and have WWIII. Cod went with that. Its not that they hate Russians, its just that Russians are the most convenient bad guy, despite them no longer being very powerful.
Your right in your reasonings, that's not the part I picked up on though since I agree with them.
But Russia actually is as strong as ever.. It's just that they keep to themselves and don't announce everything to the world. Sure the government is weak, very much so, but the army and the population at large..

I promise, I'm done de-railing this thread now!
Or almost..

Have everyone forgotten about China? I mean, if you have to go for a conventional enemy then that's atleast the first place I would look.
I still think that in the event of a third world war, it would be the US coallition versus Russia versus China (and probably North Korea, though their realations with China are not that good at the moment).
Russia and China are both pretty weak. The Russian military is very good at making them selves look good, but in actuality they have been a bit of a joke since the Cold War. Their air force and navy has never been anything too good, even in the war. Their soldiers themselves have very little discipline and many of them still use outdated equipment.

China is like that times eleven. Their navy and air force is almost non existent. They made an aircraft carrier you say? Look at how many we already have. Their equipment is almost entirely based around ancient ones used in the sixties. Their discipline and morale is almost zero and the only thing really going for them is the mass number of them.

Tell me, how would any of them even GET to America?
I don't want to get into the Russian military even thou a lot of what you said is incorrect but China?! they can pwn basically every military on earth even if the soldiers were armed with sticks just because of the sheer numbers!

p.s america also uses 1960s equipment(m16):3
Um... no.

First off the M16 has undergone changes since it's vietnam version to make it more reliable (so our troops would stop picking up AK's for being better...)

Second, China pwning everyone? that's a laugh. Know what was really good for dealing with mass infantry rushes? Land Mines. Which is why there's still hundreds of thousands of them out there unaccounted for.

Third, if you think size of the army is everything... Saddam thought the same thing. During Gulf War Iraq's army was what... the 4th largest in the world? And it got obliterated in a month.

I could go into further detail, but I already sound like your average "America Fuck yea!" idiot, so I'll stop while I'm ahead.
Say what ever you want but the Chinese is more well armed and disciplined than Saddam's army.
 

urilukin

New member
May 16, 2011
84
0
0
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
snip

i would not say thats a good thing, nothing good is accomplished when your army is cold hearted and lacks compassion what so ever.
No, but US soldiers cant live without a frickin poptart in their MREs (Generation Kill reference), while russians in general don't need that much to survive. Which is why they tolerated dictatorships and how they repelled every invasion.

Being a spoiled pussy doesn't accomplish anything either.
1. generation kill was shit and had such a slam against the war and the soldiers it was almost sickening.
2. Marines usually have to pay alot of this with their own money, and they signed up for some fucking hard training and have bullets shot at them and risk road side bombs on a daily basis in a fucking desert. you dont have room to call them "pussies" or "spoiled". just because russians are batshit insane doesn't mean a military HAS to be insane as well. after all, would you rather have insane soldiers that treated the populace like shit in the name of a dictator or Regular soldiers who have sympathy and actually help rebuild cities and supply medical equipment and other stuff?
and for the record, russians have had the highest death toll than most other countries since WW1, apparently they may be able to survive but not as well as you think.

also i find your generalization of Russians in pretty poor taste. Russians have emotions and their own style of coping with it. and i respect them for it. who am i too judge?

but in all honestly, the russian being the enemy in games is getting old.
Generation kill was shit?! what the hell are you talking about!?
generation kill had me going for two episodes, then it just became a mean spirited skewed version on the war (not saying it was sunshine a lolipops but good god!). Besides the guy who wrote it worked for rolling stone magazine, cant fucking stand them.
YEAH, HOW DARE THEY DEPICT THE WAR IN REALISTIC MATTER?! and why do you hate rolling stone? because of this: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-kill-team-20110327
1. you assume that IS the realistic depiction of war. A more realistic depiction is the thin red line or....the fucking news footage or stuff found on youtube all the time.
2. you assume that im bothered with individual articles as opposed to a biased perspective overall. Yes shit happens in war, yes we get a few bad eggs, but it shouldn't represent the majority. And why is it hating fox news is ok but hating rollingstone for similar reasons is a no-no? im entitled to my opinion. Besides its a music magazine dabbing in politics.
3. I find the characters insufferable and stereotyped which made me not care. That and it was so skewed, the trained marine in their mid twenties to early forties acted like asshole teenagers while the Iraqis were just short of perfect. My favorite seen is when they helped all the civilians carry their stuff down the road and they go and ruin it with a guy accidently getting the back of his head shot off.....classy. Im not even sure that happened to be honest. as a mini series it's just annoying and mean spirited and just hard to sit through. not to mention fairly forgettable.
I heard that so many times... you know, we keep seeing stories like this and people say "Oh, you know they are just bad apples ,it is war after all" but maybe the whole fucking tree is rotten maybe it is time to cut down the whole thing, their friends knew about these incidents and did nothing so it is not just a few bad apples.
 

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
snip

i would not say thats a good thing, nothing good is accomplished when your army is cold hearted and lacks compassion what so ever.
No, but US soldiers cant live without a frickin poptart in their MREs (Generation Kill reference), while russians in general don't need that much to survive. Which is why they tolerated dictatorships and how they repelled every invasion.

Being a spoiled pussy doesn't accomplish anything either.
1. generation kill was shit and had such a slam against the war and the soldiers it was almost sickening.
2. Marines usually have to pay alot of this with their own money, and they signed up for some fucking hard training and have bullets shot at them and risk road side bombs on a daily basis in a fucking desert. you dont have room to call them "pussies" or "spoiled". just because russians are batshit insane doesn't mean a military HAS to be insane as well. after all, would you rather have insane soldiers that treated the populace like shit in the name of a dictator or Regular soldiers who have sympathy and actually help rebuild cities and supply medical equipment and other stuff?
and for the record, russians have had the highest death toll than most other countries since WW1, apparently they may be able to survive but not as well as you think.

also i find your generalization of Russians in pretty poor taste. Russians have emotions and their own style of coping with it. and i respect them for it. who am i too judge?

but in all honestly, the russian being the enemy in games is getting old.
Generation kill was shit?! what the hell are you talking about!?
generation kill had me going for two episodes, then it just became a mean spirited skewed version on the war (not saying it was sunshine a lolipops but good god!). Besides the guy who wrote it worked for rolling stone magazine, cant fucking stand them.
YEAH, HOW DARE THEY DEPICT THE WAR IN REALISTIC MATTER?! and why do you hate rolling stone? because of this: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-kill-team-20110327
1. you assume that IS the realistic depiction of war. A more realistic depiction is the thin red line or....the fucking news footage or stuff found on youtube all the time.
2. you assume that im bothered with individual articles as opposed to a biased perspective overall. Yes shit happens in war, yes we get a few bad eggs, but it shouldn't represent the majority. And why is it hating fox news is ok but hating rollingstone for similar reasons is a no-no? im entitled to my opinion. Besides its a music magazine dabbing in politics.
3. I find the characters insufferable and stereotyped which made me not care. That and it was so skewed, the trained marine in their mid twenties to early forties acted like asshole teenagers while the Iraqis were just short of perfect. My favorite seen is when they helped all the civilians carry their stuff down the road and they go and ruin it with a guy accidently getting the back of his head shot off.....classy. Im not even sure that happened to be honest. as a mini series it's just annoying and mean spirited and just hard to sit through. not to mention fairly forgettable.
I heard that so many times... you know, we keep seeing stories like this and people say "Oh, you know they are just bad apples ,it is war after all" but maybe the whole fucking tree is rotten maybe it is time to cut down the whole thing, their friends knew about these incidents and did nothing so it is not just a few bad apples.
wow, and on November 11th too, shame on you.
and generalizing a whole army for what a few do? hey, why don't you just generalize black people by saying they create crime? (which is not true)
and you know good and damn well that soldiers do not go without reprimanding when they do wrong. It only a few bad ones that the media over blows to make the whole look bad. that's not new, its always done like that (Oliver Stone's shit movies). why don't you research instead of flapping your jaws?
you sir disgust me beyond belief.
 

Shirokurou

New member
Mar 8, 2010
1,039
0
0
urilukin said:
Shirokurou said:
As a Russian, I can tell you this.
Russia is friggin undefeatable in any war which we didn't start ourselves.

Seriously, ask Napoleon or Hitler.

So all Russians view the anti-Russian FPS thing as a... "yeah they wish" and secretly all knowing that if what we'll pwn the hell out of the US.

Not to get on political shallow ice, but the 08.08.08 Russia-Georgia conflict actually had the Georgian side with American military training, advisors and equipment and they got overtaken pretty easily.

But again, nukes... the earth has them, so a Russia-US conflict is out of the question.
Besides, I see no reason to take over the US as a Russian. I like your entertainment stuff, you don't really have some kind of resource we want badly, so yeah.

Oh and in CoD and BF3 multiplayer, there are 2 teams. So half the time you're killing simple US soldiers for the glory of mother Russia.

That is all.
What do you mean YOUR entertainment stuff? i am also Russian.
I was addressing the Americans.
Откуда ты кстати?
 

urilukin

New member
May 16, 2011
84
0
0
Shirokurou said:
urilukin said:
Shirokurou said:
As a Russian, I can tell you this.
Russia is friggin undefeatable in any war which we didn't start ourselves.

Seriously, ask Napoleon or Hitler.

So all Russians view the anti-Russian FPS thing as a... "yeah they wish" and secretly all knowing that if what we'll pwn the hell out of the US.

Not to get on political shallow ice, but the 08.08.08 Russia-Georgia conflict actually had the Georgian side with American military training, advisors and equipment and they got overtaken pretty easily.

But again, nukes... the earth has them, so a Russia-US conflict is out of the question.
Besides, I see no reason to take over the US as a Russian. I like your entertainment stuff, you don't really have some kind of resource we want badly, so yeah.

Oh and in CoD and BF3 multiplayer, there are 2 teams. So half the time you're killing simple US soldiers for the glory of mother Russia.

That is all.
What do you mean YOUR entertainment stuff? i am also Russian.
I was addressing the Americans.
Откуда ты кстати?
Домодедово :)
 

urilukin

New member
May 16, 2011
84
0
0
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
snip

i would not say thats a good thing, nothing good is accomplished when your army is cold hearted and lacks compassion what so ever.
No, but US soldiers cant live without a frickin poptart in their MREs (Generation Kill reference), while russians in general don't need that much to survive. Which is why they tolerated dictatorships and how they repelled every invasion.

Being a spoiled pussy doesn't accomplish anything either.
1. generation kill was shit and had such a slam against the war and the soldiers it was almost sickening.
2. Marines usually have to pay alot of this with their own money, and they signed up for some fucking hard training and have bullets shot at them and risk road side bombs on a daily basis in a fucking desert. you dont have room to call them "pussies" or "spoiled". just because russians are batshit insane doesn't mean a military HAS to be insane as well. after all, would you rather have insane soldiers that treated the populace like shit in the name of a dictator or Regular soldiers who have sympathy and actually help rebuild cities and supply medical equipment and other stuff?
and for the record, russians have had the highest death toll than most other countries since WW1, apparently they may be able to survive but not as well as you think.

also i find your generalization of Russians in pretty poor taste. Russians have emotions and their own style of coping with it. and i respect them for it. who am i too judge?

but in all honestly, the russian being the enemy in games is getting old.
Generation kill was shit?! what the hell are you talking about!?
generation kill had me going for two episodes, then it just became a mean spirited skewed version on the war (not saying it was sunshine a lolipops but good god!). Besides the guy who wrote it worked for rolling stone magazine, cant fucking stand them.
YEAH, HOW DARE THEY DEPICT THE WAR IN REALISTIC MATTER?! and why do you hate rolling stone? because of this: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-kill-team-20110327
1. you assume that IS the realistic depiction of war. A more realistic depiction is the thin red line or....the fucking news footage or stuff found on youtube all the time.
2. you assume that im bothered with individual articles as opposed to a biased perspective overall. Yes shit happens in war, yes we get a few bad eggs, but it shouldn't represent the majority. And why is it hating fox news is ok but hating rollingstone for similar reasons is a no-no? im entitled to my opinion. Besides its a music magazine dabbing in politics.
3. I find the characters insufferable and stereotyped which made me not care. That and it was so skewed, the trained marine in their mid twenties to early forties acted like asshole teenagers while the Iraqis were just short of perfect. My favorite seen is when they helped all the civilians carry their stuff down the road and they go and ruin it with a guy accidently getting the back of his head shot off.....classy. Im not even sure that happened to be honest. as a mini series it's just annoying and mean spirited and just hard to sit through. not to mention fairly forgettable.
I heard that so many times... you know, we keep seeing stories like this and people say "Oh, you know they are just bad apples ,it is war after all" but maybe the whole fucking tree is rotten maybe it is time to cut down the whole thing, their friends knew about these incidents and did nothing so it is not just a few bad apples.
wow, and on November 11th too, shame on you.
and generalizing a whole army for what a few do? hey, why don't you just generalize black people by saying they create crime? (which is not true)
and you know good and damn well that soldiers do not go without reprimanding when they do wrong. It only a few bad ones that the media over blows to make the whole look bad. that's not new, its always done like that (Oliver Stone's shit movies). why don't you research instead of flapping your jaws?
you sir disgust me beyond belief.
Well, as I said before all of their friends knew about these incidents and them not reporting anything is just as bad as doing it. So you think that if they were in a different platoon someone would have reported it? I doubt it, make your own conclusions.
 

Shirokurou

New member
Mar 8, 2010
1,039
0
0
urilukin said:
Домодедово :)
Привет из Калнинграда.
But on topic, I've noticed that CoD lately is looking for "disturbing content" to put into it's games just for shock value. Can't say I like it.
 

urilukin

New member
May 16, 2011
84
0
0
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
urilukin said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
Jegsimmons said:
Cowpoo said:
snip

i would not say thats a good thing, nothing good is accomplished when your army is cold hearted and lacks compassion what so ever.
No, but US soldiers cant live without a frickin poptart in their MREs (Generation Kill reference), while russians in general don't need that much to survive. Which is why they tolerated dictatorships and how they repelled every invasion.

Being a spoiled pussy doesn't accomplish anything either.
1. generation kill was shit and had such a slam against the war and the soldiers it was almost sickening.
2. Marines usually have to pay alot of this with their own money, and they signed up for some fucking hard training and have bullets shot at them and risk road side bombs on a daily basis in a fucking desert. you dont have room to call them "pussies" or "spoiled". just because russians are batshit insane doesn't mean a military HAS to be insane as well. after all, would you rather have insane soldiers that treated the populace like shit in the name of a dictator or Regular soldiers who have sympathy and actually help rebuild cities and supply medical equipment and other stuff?
and for the record, russians have had the highest death toll than most other countries since WW1, apparently they may be able to survive but not as well as you think.

also i find your generalization of Russians in pretty poor taste. Russians have emotions and their own style of coping with it. and i respect them for it. who am i too judge?

but in all honestly, the russian being the enemy in games is getting old.
Generation kill was shit?! what the hell are you talking about!?
generation kill had me going for two episodes, then it just became a mean spirited skewed version on the war (not saying it was sunshine a lolipops but good god!). Besides the guy who wrote it worked for rolling stone magazine, cant fucking stand them.
YEAH, HOW DARE THEY DEPICT THE WAR IN REALISTIC MATTER?! and why do you hate rolling stone? because of this: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-kill-team-20110327
1. you assume that IS the realistic depiction of war. A more realistic depiction is the thin red line or....the fucking news footage or stuff found on youtube all the time.
2. you assume that im bothered with individual articles as opposed to a biased perspective overall. Yes shit happens in war, yes we get a few bad eggs, but it shouldn't represent the majority. And why is it hating fox news is ok but hating rollingstone for similar reasons is a no-no? im entitled to my opinion. Besides its a music magazine dabbing in politics.
3. I find the characters insufferable and stereotyped which made me not care. That and it was so skewed, the trained marine in their mid twenties to early forties acted like asshole teenagers while the Iraqis were just short of perfect. My favorite seen is when they helped all the civilians carry their stuff down the road and they go and ruin it with a guy accidently getting the back of his head shot off.....classy. Im not even sure that happened to be honest. as a mini series it's just annoying and mean spirited and just hard to sit through. not to mention fairly forgettable.
I heard that so many times... you know, we keep seeing stories like this and people say "Oh, you know they are just bad apples ,it is war after all" but maybe the whole fucking tree is rotten maybe it is time to cut down the whole thing, their friends knew about these incidents and did nothing so it is not just a few bad apples.
wow, and on November 11th too, shame on you.
and generalizing a whole army for what a few do? hey, why don't you just generalize black people by saying they create crime? (which is not true)
and you know good and damn well that soldiers do not go without reprimanding when they do wrong. It only a few bad ones that the media over blows to make the whole look bad. that's not new, its always done like that (Oliver Stone's shit movies). why don't you research instead of flapping your jaws?
you sir disgust me beyond belief.
Oh, and what today being veteran's day means that all soldiers a untouchable?
GTFO Mr. captain America.
 

bl4ckh4wk64

Walking Mass Effect Codex
Jun 11, 2010
1,277
0
0
Bhaalspawn said:
I just realized. When the US finally debts themselves into oblivion, guess who will be the new global superpower?

You guys don't have the military or the economic stability to do this.

OT:I haven't played MW3 and I'm not planning on it, but I can say this. There really is nothing else. I know it's immature and quite bad, but there really is no other *possible* enemy. Many people in America still think Russian can become a superpower again. Combine that with the idea that FPS games *have* to have an enemy with a face, and you get "LOLZ RUSSIANS!" I, personally, am a proponent of games where we face an enemy that looks both the same as the civilians and can easily blend into the crowd (not trying to be racist, sorry if I've offended anyone, but that's what real war is now). The enemy uses hit and run tactics, guerilla warfare, and human shields. However, a game like that won't go over with about 90% of the FPS crowd because there's no explosions and gratuitous violence. I'm sorry, but there really is no alternative other than futuristic FPS's against Russians, or futuristic FPS's against Aliens.
 

urilukin

New member
May 16, 2011
84
0
0
bl4ckh4wk64 said:
Bhaalspawn said:
I just realized. When the US finally debts themselves into oblivion, guess who will be the new global superpower?

You guys don't have the military or the economic stability to do this.
Have you ever heard of a joke? and look at America and its glorious economic stability with its huge-arse debt.
 

bl4ckh4wk64

Walking Mass Effect Codex
Jun 11, 2010
1,277
0
0
urilukin said:
bl4ckh4wk64 said:
Bhaalspawn said:
I just realized. When the US finally debts themselves into oblivion, guess who will be the new global superpower?

You guys don't have the military or the economic stability to do this.
Have you ever heard of a joke? and look at America and its glorious economic stability with its huge-arse debt.
I can understand that it's a joke and I wasn't meaning it as a serious answer... And even now, America has a much better economy that much of Europe, minus Germany, and our military is still the most prominent, best trained in the world. I'm not saying that because of my American bias, I'm saying that based on the operations they've completed. Special Forces units? Navy SEALs, Army Rangers, Marine Expeditionary Units, Marine Force Recon, Deltas, etc. They have all completed missions with extraordinary success. Russian Special Forces? Spetsnaz. Beslan Massacre? Tragedy. Definitely not befitting of a special forces unit. Yes, Spetsnaz have some badass training programs and they're taught to fight with a shovel (which is pretty fuckin awesome if I do say so myself) but that's all for naught if you can't manage to covertly storm a building.
 

kurtzy23

New member
Aug 26, 2010
82
0
0
Its just how peoples opinions have changed because of the cold war. If the cold war never happend they would just replace the generic russian enimies with another generic enemy with a new accent.
 

urilukin

New member
May 16, 2011
84
0
0
bl4ckh4wk64 said:
urilukin said:
bl4ckh4wk64 said:
Bhaalspawn said:
I just realized. When the US finally debts themselves into oblivion, guess who will be the new global superpower?

You guys don't have the military or the economic stability to do this.
Have you ever heard of a joke? and look at America and its glorious economic stability with its huge-arse debt.
I can understand that it's a joke and I wasn't meaning it as a serious answer... And even now, America has a much better economy that much of Europe, minus Germany, and our military is still the most prominent, best trained in the world. I'm not saying that because of my American bias, I'm saying that based on the operations they've completed. Special Forces units? Navy SEALs, Army Rangers, Marine Expeditionary Units, Marine Force Recon, Deltas, etc. They have all completed missions with extraordinary success. Russian Special Forces? Spetsnaz. Beslan Massacre? Tragedy. Definitely not befitting of a special forces unit. Yes, Spetsnaz have some badass training programs and they're taught to fight with a shovel (which is pretty fuckin awesome if I do say so myself) but that's all for naught if you can't manage to covertly storm a building.
America does not have a better economy than Europe... and the only reason America has the biggest military is because they spend 99% of taxes on it.