Elementary school kids swearing and dating?

Recommended Videos

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
Nouw said:
SnootyEnglishman said:
It's the lack of discipline i tells you. *Shakes cane*
Best post, it works on so many levels! Made me laugh.

Also, I can not stress this enough.

Do not generalize
Just because one school you visited had kids like that doesn't mean every kid in the world is going to be like that.

It's true a lot of the 11-12 year olds in my school have girlfriends/boyfriends and drop them as quickly as them found them. It can be a positive as they should learn what not to do and what to do. Although I doubt it...

You just have to accept it, but of course I blame the ever-changing society. Damn media! It's the media I tell you!

About the punishment thing, read Starship Troopers and it will add new perspectives.
This is also a great response. After my 5th grade class left, the kids turned into little goody-two-shoes who barely knew what sex was until they got into middle school, so obviously it varies.
 

Logic 0

New member
Aug 28, 2009
1,676
0
0
At least it's somewhat comforting to know this wave of jerkiness isn't just in my area.
 

Tibike77

New member
Mar 20, 2008
299
0
0
Clarification : I am actually (mostly) AGREEING with the person I am quoting below because he has a similar attitude on it. I am merely putting that out of context to give a slightly different and more detailed perspective, since this is the only part I can disagree with. To put it in other words, I *am* saying you should beat your kids when they really deserve it.
Swny Nerdgasm said:
Now I'm not saying you should beat your kids when they do something wrong
WHY NOT ? Seriously, what's with the wishy-washy attitude ?
How exactly is a butt-cheek slap that completely fades away in a matter of minutes not ok ?
Physically punishing your child is NOT the same as physical abuse.
There's a big difference between discipline and violence, and yes, parents who can't discern where that difference lies should not touch their children, but COME ON, at a certain age (especially early on, up to 7 or 8 and thereabouts), anything ELSE you try just isn't effective, or worse, it ends up having the opposite effect.

Generation after generation has matured with parental spanking, and we didn't have a generalized discipline problem. Now that it's all of a sudden "not ok to lay a hand on your child", you have THIS situation everybody is complaining about. I'm just saying... it's kind of obvious.
 

BlueGlowstick

New member
Nov 18, 2010
224
0
0
I was cussing in 8th grade yet hit puberty in 6th grade. but when I was about to graduate from elementary school I heard of a supposed "relationship" on the school bus & when I was in 7th grade my best friend told me she heard that a cheerleader had slept with someone in her bathroom. =/ I hate rumors.
 

Daft Sikes

New member
Jun 10, 2010
1,073
0
0
Heh, I'm not surprised. I volunteered at my little brothers school. The little runts in the elementary wing kept on talking about on how they "got a wicked headshot in BO" and adding unnecessary swears in almost all of their sentences. The same when I went to the junior high wing, except less Call of Duty, more girls dressing in provacotive clothing and leering.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
Tibike77 said:
Swny Nerdgasm said:
Now I'm not saying you should beat your kids when they do something wrong
WHY NOT ? Seriously, what's with the wishy-washy attitude ?
How exactly is a butt-cheek slap that completely fades away in a matter of minutes not ok ?
Physically punishing your child is NOT the same as physical abuse.
There's a big difference between discipline and violence, and yes, parents who can't discern where that difference lies should not touch their children, but COME ON, at a certain age (especially early on, up to 7 or 8 and thereabouts), anything ELSE you try just isn't effective, or worse, it ends up having the opposite effect.

Generation after generation has matured with parental spanking, and we didn't have a generalized discipline problem. Now that it's all of a sudden "not ok to lay a hand on your child", you have THIS situation everybody is complaining about. I'm just saying... it's kind of obvious.
What he was trying to say is that if you JUST spank your kid without even telling him/her what she did wrong, than it won't change their behavior as easily because they just think "Wow, my dad is being a jerk, I guess I'd better be more sneaky about it."
 

Tibike77

New member
Mar 20, 2008
299
0
0
Ham_authority95 said:
What he was trying to say is that if you JUST spank your kid without even telling him/her what she did wrong, than it won't change their behavior as easily because they just think "Wow, my dad is being a jerk, I guess I'd better be more sneaky about it."
Added clarification to the post in question.
I was actually mostly agreeing with him but took just a part of his post out of context to illustrate my point about the "any physical punishment is bad" attitude OTHER people seem to be a big follower of.
The only part I was not agreeing with was in fact the part quoted, because I wholeheartedly endorse the "you SHOULD spank your kids when they do something monumentally wrong" school of child education.

archvile93 said:
While I certainly agree that children shouldn't be allowed to run around doing whatever little thought crosses their minds. I'm currently studying human psychology, and most of the studies I've read suggest that physical punishment is one of the poorest motivational tools a parent has. One of the main problems, in addition to the emotional ramifications of making such a motivational technique standard, is that it doesn't really teach children not do something bad, it just teaches them not to do it while your watching.
ANY form of punishment you dole out will "only teach the child it's not ok to do it while you're watching", regardless what the punishment is. Singling out spanking or similar physical punishments makes absolutely no sense.
Also, the THREAT of physical punishment is more effective than actual punishment (not even a voiced threat, but just one implied by an authoritative, stern voice), and even when actually engaging in physical punishment, "less is more"... but the child needs to be fully aware that physical punishment IS on the table as a valid punishment in case things go too far on his end... THEN you can substitute it with whatever other punishments you prefer.
Ideally, physical punishment should only be employed at all when actions of the child could have lead to permanent physical harm, be it for himself or others, and even then more than just a minor slap/spank in case it's a "repeat offense". For everything else, almost always non-physical punishment, unless repeatedly disobeying here too.
It's also extremely important for the child to know you will never lay a hand on him just because you're angry, but because he did something that was wrong or dangerous.

You can argue as much as you like, but when you see the kid heading towards the wall socket with a fork in his hand, NOTHING compares to a loud shout (to startle and hopefully stall him until you get there) followed by a quick spanking. Then you can calmly explain why that was a bad thing as much as you like.
 

SturmDolch

This Title is Ironic
May 17, 2009
2,346
0
0
I swore in grade 6. Hell, I might have sworn in grade 5. And I wasn't a rebel kid or anything.

Also, I had a crush on a girl in grade 6, and at the time I would have loved a long term relationship with her.

Am I completely messed up today? Not at all. Are all my relationships now shallow and meaningless? Actually, I've only been in one in my life and I'm still happily in it. Do I swear all the time? No.

Stop overreacting. The argument that kids are getting worse is wrong. The problem is that people are turning into geezers sooner. I imagine that in 10 years, most 20-30 year olds will be screaming at kids to get off their lawn and turn off that damn rock n roll.
 

CrustyOatmeal

New member
Jul 4, 2010
428
0
0
whats so strange about kids trying to act like adults? i remember cursing being normal in 3rd grade (and i grew up in a mostly christian mountain community) and i asked out my first girlfrend in 5th grade and was considered late to the game

kids try to be grown-ups and grown-ups believe in the innocence of youth; both live in a fantasy land
 

Gentile

New member
Nov 19, 2010
120
0
0
Tibike77 said:
Gentile said:
Kinda strange to go through thousands of years of advancement only to have the age of sexual maturity drop drastically so recently. isn't it?
Oh, hey, ever read "Romeo and Juliet" ? Guess what age Juliet was supposed to have in the original play... if you guessed "going on 14", then you guessed right.
Also, it was not awfully unusual for women in the middle ages to marry AND HAVE CHILDREN by the age of 12 or even earlier.
Get your facts straight.
They had good reason to get married at their mid teens at the time. Nowadays, it's well beyond impractical (But yet people seem to insist anyway) Hmm I wonder why.

Anyway, Sexual maturity refers to the age at which a woman can physically bear children. The guy I quoted expects preschoolers to begin having sex soon - which after thousands of years of advancement, still doesn't look like the age of sexual maturity would drop to that age. Better luck next time :]
 

Tibike77

New member
Mar 20, 2008
299
0
0
Gentile said:
The guy I quoted expects preschoolers to begin having sex soon
That was obviously a sarcastic remark, not meant seriously. Or at least, to me it was.
 

yizas

New member
Nov 19, 2009
89
0
0
We need to spank the little fuckers, if i ever swore and my father heard it, he would just take his belt and hit me a couple of times

it wasnt that hard but still enough for me to straighten up
 

SL33TBL1ND

Elite Member
Nov 9, 2008
6,467
0
41
Tibike77 said:
Blame it on Ben said:
Is it just me or is something wrong with kids recently?
It's not just you, but there's also nothing wrong with the kids either on the sexual front.
Sixth grade is what, 12-13 years old ? Puberty has already started for quite a few kids that age, and you can't treat them like children anymore.

Then again, you shouldn't treat children "like children" (in other words "like idiots") either.
Just because they're young doesn't mean they're stupid. Uneducated, misguided, lacking experience, sure... but not stupider than they'll end up being when they reach adulthood.

I don't know about you, but I started being interested in girls and sexuality around 3rd or 4th grade (so about age 10-11). The vast majority of my classmates shared similar interests. Ok, I ended up being more interested in computers and science-fiction soon afterwards, but that's a completely different story.
I guess I just have a better memory of the time I was a little kid compared to other adults... I mean, it WAS over 20 years ago, so... eh.

P.S. On the discipline front however... ouch.
Whoever had the stupid idea that you shouldn't spank/slap children was an idiot, and whoever keeps agreeing are even greater idiots. As long as no permanent physical damage is inflicted, physical punishment (pain in particular) IS the best didactic tool.
Even better is negative and positive reinforcement together. As in, respect and maybe a treat for being good and a cuff 'round the ear for fucking up.
 

Drakmeire

Elite Member
Jun 27, 2009
2,590
0
41
Country
United States
eventually they'll learn that an innocent childhood is a terrible thing to waste. I still try and have fun and be carefree, but it's a lot tougher when your an adult. it's not your job to worry, that's for parents. enjoy YOUR life and don't freak out about theirs.
 

Tibike77

New member
Mar 20, 2008
299
0
0
SL33TBL1ND said:
Even better is negative and positive reinforcement together. As in, respect and maybe a treat for being good and a cuff 'round the ear for fucking up.
Obviously.
Just saying one should not completely eliminate the possibility of physical punishment on occasion, like some people seem hell-bent on doing.