I rarely visit Reddit, but this strikes me as a good thing. If you want to create "safe spaces" online then go and CREATE them. Don't rip chunks out of existing sites in order to make them "safe".
I think the issue stemmed from the fact that she brought in new rules that run counter to the core of what the site is in the first place, then went on to not enforce them outside of a very few cases where it almost seemed to be in line with what could be considered an insult to her (I say almost because I don't want to believe that she is openly racist. Never attribute malice to what could simply be incompetence after all). Plus, given how the company has less then 75 people working for it, any call on who is fired is going to go through her position, either as the one who made the decision or as the one approving one of the less then 5 people who would logically make that call under her in such a small company (though given the size of the company, the former is the more likely). Given her position, it is clear she would have either been the one to make the call, or at the least signed off on it, both of which are pretty infuriating for the users, and are yet another part of the long list of reasons why the site's users hate her.LifeCharacter said:Hooray that wicked witch who enforced site rules and closed subreddits whose mods weren't doing their damn jobs and who is apparently 100% responsible when an employee is fired has resigned after lots and lots of pressure.
I think you're confusing "trying to get someone fired for something in absolutely no way related with their job" with "trying to get someone fired for utterly failing at their job".I thought that was something we were supposed to be against, but fuck it, no bad tactics after all.
So why accept it and let the harassers get what they want, and suffer no consequences? Why don't we push to be better?FirstNameLastName said:I think people have had several thousand years of human history to learn that threats, violence, intimidation and harassment will (unfortunately) get you what you want. I doubt this will change much; if people haven't learned it by now they're not going to.BreakfastMan said:Regardless of her actual job as CEO (don't really use reddit that much, so I have no opinions there), this kind of seems like it could be a really bad move. Why? Mainly because, from what I gather, there was a TON of harassment directed at her. And since she did what the harassers wanted (to some extent, at least), this is going to be seen by those as harassers as a sign that harassing people gets them what they want. Not to mention other groups will see that these tactics look like they are being effective, and will start employing them on their own (for a recent example, see anti-vaccers adopting the tactics of the worst of GamerGate to attack journalists and politicians). And that just makes the internet as worse place overall. :\
Why? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. You've seen how SJWs have relentlessly hounded people out of the industry for speaking up against them. Turnabout is fair play. If you're fighting an enemy who has no honor, holding on to your principles when battling them isn't just stupid, it's actively self-defeating.BreakfastMan said:So why accept it and let the harassers get what they want, and suffer no consequences? Why don't we push to be better?
I was talking in terms of the harassers of Ellen Pao. Seriously, she didn't deserve the shit she got from the users like that. It was just foul.Marxie said:I wonder what the harassed would do if they didn't have their computer screens to protect them. Being such poor fragile flowers getting paid my 10 years salary every month for fucking up - I just can't imagine them surviving an angry /b/tard's rageburst IRL. Much less try and use violence on people with such short temper.Padwolf said:I wonder what those harassers would do if they didn't have their computer screens to protect them?
The concept of being good/bad at a job doesn't exist for the social justice crowd. Everything is reduced to the lowest common denominator of identity politics. Now the focus will repeatedly be diverted to reddit's toxic, misogynistic community while the legitimacy of the community's complaints (which is well established) will be casually waved away.Marxie said:Except that said forumites are literally her clientele. Not fucking up muh Reddit is her job. For all I know she could be Hitler Incarnate and I wouldn't give a flying fuck about it, as long as she's doing a halfway decent job. But as fucking everyone who use Reddit (i.e. - the people who's opinion actually matters) can say - she wasn't. Moderation of Reddit has been quite shit for awhile now, but with the Pao's coming it took a nosedive and embraced the Challenger Deep.
I don't know when someone drugged me and I woke up in this wacko-world where "progressive" values and sex were a shield against criticism for frivolous lawsuits. According to the mainstream media, she has been "pushed out by misogynistic harassers" instead of the reality that she was horrible at her job at both a technical and cultural level.StreamerDarkly said:The concept of being good/bad at a job doesn't exist for the social justice crowd. Everything is reduced to the lowest common denominator of identity politics. Now the focus will repeatedly be diverted to reddit's toxic, misogynistic community while the legitimacy of the community's complaints (which is well established) will be casually waved away.Marxie said:Except that said forumites are literally her clientele. Not fucking up muh Reddit is her job. For all I know she could be Hitler Incarnate and I wouldn't give a flying fuck about it, as long as she's doing a halfway decent job. But as fucking everyone who use Reddit (i.e. - the people who's opinion actually matters) can say - she wasn't. Moderation of Reddit has been quite shit for awhile now, but with the Pao's coming it took a nosedive and embraced the Challenger Deep.
That's why it was perfectly fine to run Brendan Eich out of the Mozilla CEO position on a rail, but it's a gross miscarriage of justice that Ellen Pao was booted. It's blindingly obvious which of these two people was qualified for the job and earned it on merits. The difference is that one was a white guy whose politics were viewed as anti-progressive, the other was a minority woman with the "correct" political leanings. A vexatious lawsuit here or there isn't worth quibbling about.
Wow.Random Gamer said:Can anyone tell me how this shit is possible, because it's quite amazing - specially considering the order in which the article had been revised. Had it occurred the other way around, it would make sense for a respected newspaper, but that way?
http://newsdiffs.org/diff/934341/934454/www.nytimes.com/2015/07/11/technology/ellen-pao-reddit-chief-executive-resignation.html
published 7:48pm, was edited at 10:42pm when the word "sexist" was changed to "male-dominated".Ellen Pao became a hero to many when she took on the entrenched sexist culture of Silicon Valley.