Yeah, this. I remember seeing it when I was younger and crying every 20 minutes. Too bad Sean Penn went full retard, he could have got the best actor oscarpimppeter2 said:The whole I am Sam movie.
It was so sad.
But that would have been an awful ending. The entire purpose of the movie was to subvert and invert the entire genre of a slasher movie. Everything you thought was going to happen didn't. The killers weren't dark, evil-looking monsters. They were seemingly well-behaved young men. You didn't see them stand in a closet and hear them breathe creepily for ten minutes before they killed someone. They were right there in the open. You saw everything they did, often in broad daylight.funguy2121 said:Hated, hated, hated that movie. The ending was terrible, the punk music was terrible, the fact that they were not only sociopathic baby-murderers but spoiled preppy assholes to boot was terrible, the worst 4th wall breaking ever was, well, terrible, the rewind scene was friggin' terrible.Rahheemme said:Every time Paul says something in Funny Games. That was emotionally moving, but in a different, pants-wetting way.
I read that the director's purpose was to see if he could convince the audience to leave. Stupid me, I thought if I stuck around long enough there would be some dark-side-flirtation and the bad guys would get a shotgun blast to the head or something.
Really? I thought that the opening of Watchmen was a little too cliche, uninspired music and a bunch of costumes that just look ridiculous when not in the comic book. I liked the movie overall, but those points hampered it throughout the whole thingPulse Reality said:Sort of Search Bar approved. I searched but couldn't find anything about Emotionally moving scenes, only best scene, et cetera.
What are some of the most Emotionally Moving Scenes in films that you have seen?
The Opening Sequence in Watchmen [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2hNhM3dHB4] was the most emotionally moving scene I have ever been blessed to watch.
EDIT: Also, please remember to use Spoiler tags when appropriate. Thank you!
I really hate to do this because, based on what I recall of his track record, I should absolutely despise the man, but I'm gonna quote Roger Ebert on this one. Well, paraphrase, really:Rahheemme said:But that would have been an awful ending. The entire purpose of the movie was to subvert and invert the entire genre of a slasher movie. Everything you thought was going to happen didn't. The killers weren't dark, evil-looking monsters. They were seemingly well-behaved young men. You didn't see them stand in a closet and hear them breathe creepily for ten minutes before they killed someone. They were right there in the open. You saw everything they did, often in broad daylight.funguy2121 said:Hated, hated, hated that movie. The ending was terrible, the punk music was terrible, the fact that they were not only sociopathic baby-murderers but spoiled preppy assholes to boot was terrible, the worst 4th wall breaking ever was, well, terrible, the rewind scene was friggin' terrible.Rahheemme said:Every time Paul says something in Funny Games. That was emotionally moving, but in a different, pants-wetting way.
I read that the director's purpose was to see if he could convince the audience to leave. Stupid me, I thought if I stuck around long enough there would be some dark-side-flirtation and the bad guys would get a shotgun blast to the head or something.
Though I can see how the punk music and the 4th wall breaking would be stupid for some people (not for me, though), the ending was the best part. You root for the family because they're the victims in all this. You want a happy ending. Do they get one? FUCK no! They shotgun a seven year old and push a woman off a boat to drown! This movie accomplished it's goal and creeped the hell out of me by being the exact opposite of every other horror movie I've seen.
Well, you're right. It didn't avoid EVERY cliche, but I believe that a work of fiction needs a couple cliche elements to make the original elements stand out more. I liked it because I'm a sucker for bad guys. The two antagonists were characterized so well and so uniquely that I tended to ignore other aspects. I also really like 4th wall breaking. I guess this was just one of those movies that I really enjoyed that NO ONE else did (like Push).funguy2121 said:I really hate to do this because, based on what I recall of his track record, I should absolutely despise the man, but I'm gonna quote Roger Ebert on this one. Well, paraphrase, really:Rahheemme said:But that would have been an awful ending. The entire purpose of the movie was to subvert and invert the entire genre of a slasher movie. Everything you thought was going to happen didn't. The killers weren't dark, evil-looking monsters. They were seemingly well-behaved young men. You didn't see them stand in a closet and hear them breathe creepily for ten minutes before they killed someone. They were right there in the open. You saw everything they did, often in broad daylight.funguy2121 said:Hated, hated, hated that movie. The ending was terrible, the punk music was terrible, the fact that they were not only sociopathic baby-murderers but spoiled preppy assholes to boot was terrible, the worst 4th wall breaking ever was, well, terrible, the rewind scene was friggin' terrible.Rahheemme said:Every time Paul says something in Funny Games. That was emotionally moving, but in a different, pants-wetting way.
I read that the director's purpose was to see if he could convince the audience to leave. Stupid me, I thought if I stuck around long enough there would be some dark-side-flirtation and the bad guys would get a shotgun blast to the head or something.
Though I can see how the punk music and the 4th wall breaking would be stupid for some people (not for me, though), the ending was the best part. You root for the family because they're the victims in all this. You want a happy ending. Do they get one? FUCK no! They shotgun a seven year old and push a woman off a boat to drown! This movie accomplished it's goal and creeped the hell out of me by being the exact opposite of every other horror movie I've seen.
"The movie is meant as a thesis, and as a thesis it succeeds on every level. As an enjoyable movie, it fails miserably."
I would also (humbly) disagree with the notion that the movie subverted every horror cliche. While it was certainly unique and it did shun some conventions, there were some horror cliches, and indie cliches, that to me felt amateurish as well. The opening credits, for example. The seemingly unstoppable bad guys. That one is very cliche for any movie where it's obvious the director is having fun showing the indestructibility of the murderer/monster. For more, see Friday the 13th, Halloween, the Hannibal movies... The less-is-more cinematography. Every time violence occurred off camera I thought of Michael Madsen cutting off the cop's ear in Reservoir Dogs. Oh, and when Naomi Watts jumped out in front of the second car after hiding from the first, and the second car turned out to be the bad guys...super lame.
It did its job though, and it proved its point. I just hated the movie for it.