Yeah. Directors need to be a bit more creative with their world endings. Though you've got to have Fenrir and Dragons and Valkyries, they are a staple of Ragnarok, and awesome to boot.Deviate said:I'm kind of hoping for Ragnarok myself. I mean, you don't get a more badass doomsday scenario. The World Serpent, the Fenris Wolf (who's jaws stretch from the skies to the ground), the Jotun and the Norse Gods clashing in the titanic end of the world. It's as far as I know the only doomsday scenario where even the Gods perish, leaving only two mortals to recreate the world.
Now THAT would have made a movie. Just call it Ragnarok, set it in 2012 for shits and giggles, have the Fimbulwinter be portrayed through climate change and bam. Here comes the Norse Gods and all the most batshit awesome armageddon visuals of all time. All viewed from the perspective of the hapless mortals of course. Hell, even Hollywood would have to be satisfied with the premise, given that the two surviving mortals would lend themselves to a shitty romance story.
LOL.... That would actually work..Deviate said:I'm kind of hoping for Ragnarok myself. I mean, you don't get a more badass doomsday scenario. The World Serpent, the Fenris Wolf (who's jaws stretch from the skies to the ground), the Jotun and the Norse Gods clashing in the titanic end of the world. It's as far as I know the only doomsday scenario where even the Gods perish, leaving only two mortals to recreate the world.
Now THAT would have made a movie. Just call it Ragnarok, set it in 2012 for shits and giggles, have the Fimbulwinter be portrayed through climate change and bam. Here comes the Norse Gods and all the most batshit awesome armageddon visuals of all time. All viewed from the perspective of the hapless mortals of course. Hell, even Hollywood would have to be satisfied with the premise, given that the two surviving mortals would lend themselves to a shitty romance story.
Zachary Amaranth said:Yes, and it's been successfully ignored by people for ages, too.Insanity72 said:Haven't we known this since....ages ago
Y2K was actually a pretty valid fear. Not the end of the world bit but all of the worlds computers really would've gone down the shitter were it not for updates. It has to do with the computer's calendar/clock. In fact, we're due for another one relatively soon.Qitz said:Isn't there a Mayan Calender that goes on to 2040 or some such anyways?
Also, it's not going to stop people going "DA WORLD GUNNA END!" they've been doing it for years now after all, Y2K ftw.
It's a great excuse to do stupid shit. I mean, if there isn't going to be anyone after you anyway, why not leave a mess to clean up?Colour-Scientist said:I thought it's supposed to end in 2050? I can't keep track anymore. Every generation loves to believe that they'll be the last.Lukeje said:Bah. Everyone knows that the world is going to end in 2038 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem].