Erm, How is it possible to even make a movie like this!?!?!

Recommended Videos

jboking

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,694
0
0
all it takes to make this movie is tons of bad CG and one interesting vs. thread.
 

wadark

New member
Dec 22, 2007
397
0
0
Sure, its gonna be freaking terrible...but it'll be HILARIOUSLY terrible. It'll be trying so hard to be serious that it'll just be hysterical. That's all that really matters.
 

Straitjacketeering

New member
Jan 3, 2009
608
0
0
CaptainREBell said:
The secret to movies like this: Crack. And lots of it, fed to a bunch of nerds who don't get out enough and feel the need to justify their fear of water.
Whatever it was, I think Asylum borrowed it from Samuel Jackson and Snakes on a Plane.
There was already a snakes on a plane knockoff called snakes on a TRAIN.
 

tehweave

Gaming Wildlife
Apr 5, 2009
1,942
0
0
Oh, this is a real movie, alright. I work for blockbuster, and this just came out fairly recently. (Can't remember if it was last week or this week)

As a whole, it isn't nearly as bad as some of the dumber straight-to-dvd movies I've seen:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0443757/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1350512/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1290471/

I'm surprised the last two didn't get sued.
 

dantheman931

New member
Dec 25, 2008
579
0
0
crypt-creature said:
True, but it never flat out says 'it's a vertebrate!' just that it's a 'cartilaginous fish' that is 'very different from that of bony fish and terrestrial vertebrates'. Such is the controversy (this has actually been a popular question amongst people, just not people here) with the whole thing.
Aside from wikipedia (which I don't really trust all that much), there aren't many places on the web that say anything about it. Don't have my books with me, so I can't look it up that way either.

But they probably are vertebrates, since science needs to label everything in the interest of comfort. Uncertainties are not welcome there, nor are mysteries.
Wow, I'm sensing some issues with science here. :-O Anyway, if you further click on the hyperlink that says "fish," it takes you to said article which says that fish are vertebrates. To be honest, I normally don't trust Wikipedia, which is why I'd never use them for a research paper or something; but just for joo, I did some poking around and found this: http://www.indianchild.com/sharks.htm This says explicitly that sharks are fish, and as we've already established, fish = vertebrates. (Fish also = delicious, but tha's another thread entirely.)
 

crypt-creature

New member
May 12, 2009
585
0
0
dantheman931 said:
crypt-creature said:
True, but it never flat out says 'it's a vertebrate!' just that it's a 'cartilaginous fish' that is 'very different from that of bony fish and terrestrial vertebrates'. Such is the controversy (this has actually been a popular question amongst people, just not people here) with the whole thing.
Aside from wikipedia (which I don't really trust all that much), there aren't many places on the web that say anything about it. Don't have my books with me, so I can't look it up that way either.

But they probably are vertebrates, since science needs to label everything in the interest of comfort. Uncertainties are not welcome there, nor are mysteries.
Wow, I'm sensing some issues with science here. :-O Anyway, if you further click on the hyperlink that says "fish," it takes you to said article which says that fish are vertebrates. To be honest, I normally don't trust Wikipedia, which is why I'd never use them for a research paper or something; but just for joo, I did some poking around and found this: http://www.indianchild.com/sharks.htm This says explicitly that sharks are fish, and as we've already established, fish = vertebrates. (Fish also = delicious, but tha's another thread entirely.)
Issues with science, me? Noooo, never...*completely false innocent face*

Vertebrates, from the 'they have a spine' point of view, yeah they are 100% vertebrates.

The only reason I question it is for the same reason I question a platypus being deemed a mammal, a creature being similar to others yet different enough still having certain features so different it could (maybe should) have its own label.

That, and honestly, I like to argue sometimes.

Daw, and you looked that up for me, and to belt out a ridiculous quote, *sniff* thank you. You love me, you really love me!!
 

KittywifaMohawk

New member
Aug 17, 2008
857
0
0
OH MY GOD!
That is AMAZING! I have to go see that movie.
When I read the title of the video I just busted out into laughter and I couldn't stop.
 

Mongodyr

New member
Jul 23, 2008
275
0
0
I just saw the movie today. It was awesome!

No really, it's one of the worst movies I have seen... But it was damn entertaining! The acting... The special-effects... The plot... It all worked together to create something really laughable. Also the shark was pretty bad-ass.
 

BlackIronGuardian

New member
Dec 26, 2008
409
0
0
That's a really big shark.

HOLY FUCK, THAT'S A REALLY BIG SHARK!

HOW DID THAT SHARK GET SO BIG?

wow, that's an equally large-

HOLY FUCKBALLS AND SHITBURNING!

THAT'S A REALLY BIG OCTOPUS!!!
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
flare09 said:
Looks like another Sci-Fi Original.
Yeah, this looks like another epically bad Sci-fi Saturday night original movie. I have no idea why they keep making such horrid movies.
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,776
0
0
This doesn't look as awesome as the Toxic Avenger... Troma really knew how do make amazing B Movies!