ESA President: Research Linking Games to Violence Is Bunk

Recommended Videos

C95J

I plan to live forever.
Apr 10, 2010
3,491
0
0
Amnestic said:
"there is no peer-reviewed research that proves a causal link between violence in games and real world violence,"
Needs to be emblazoned in 50ft. tall flaming neon signs which shoot fireworks while playing a wide selection of the most iconic and memorable video game music.

You cannot get more clear than this. There is no proof.
REVOLUTION!
 

Flamma Man

New member
Jul 23, 2009
181
0
0
mattttherman3 said:
Videogames sometimes causes me to get verbaly violent with people. For instance, incompetant Halo Reach players who don't use microphones in team arena. If you don't have a mic, stay the fuck out of the arenas, you can't strategise and you will lose.
That's not the video game, that's just games and competitions in general. It's like yelling at someone in Football who doesn't listen to directions.
 

meglathon

New member
Oct 9, 2008
403
0
0
I really hope this gets smashed because if not, it WILL spiral out of control and infect all other forms of media out there.
I could get to the point where the government can beside what can and cant entertain us. And thats a scary tough.
 

Blind Sight

New member
May 16, 2010
1,658
0
0
Mike Gallagher, you officially win the Gaming Award For Common Sense. No cash price, sorry.
 

Covarr

PS Thanks
May 29, 2009
1,559
0
0
albino boo said:
Well he would say that wouldn't he. However all they doing is helping form a wedge issue with soccer mums for the Republicans. If ESA wants to kill the law they should call for the federal imposition of these good French laws. Instead of the present case of Democrats defends chins breads who want to sell your children violent porn, the narrative for Fox would be centrist Republican calls for French laws limiting our freedom of speech. How do you think that would go down with the tea party mob? Shifting the story is what the ESA need to do and not the same old predictable knee jerk reaction the Republicans are counting on.
You, sir, have no idea what you're talking about. This is one issue that has very little to do with party lines, with both supporters and opponents of the law on each side.

Or are people like Hillary Clinton and Joe Lieberman, both avid supporters of video game censorship, Republicans now?

P.S. Thanks
 

Andronicus

Terror Australis
Mar 25, 2009
1,846
0
0
I'd hardly think of the president of the ESA's as an entirely objective opinion. I guess we'll just have to see what the Supreme Court has to say in the matter.

I'm more interested in what sort of impact this decision will ultimately have on the rest of the world (especially Australia, obviously, seeing as that's where I live).
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,075
0
0
Colonel Alzheimer said:
Canid117 said:
Sadly the other side of the argument is going to ignore the voice of reason no matter how right he is because of his title.
That was my first thought as well. This op-ed isn't going to sway anyone, correct as it may be. Now, if it were written by a popular politician, then maybe we'd be getting somewhere.
If it were written by a popular politician then the apposing side would accuse him of not caring for the children or some other bullshit. It does not matter who disagrees with them be it the President of the ESA, a popular politician, or plain facts. They have an agenda and they are going to blindly push it because life is about never admitting you are wrong!!!!
 

Substance-E

New member
Sep 28, 2010
124
0
0
Even if it gets crushed the issue will rear it's ugly head every time some kid goes ape shit with a gun and the feds find a 5 foot stack of FPS's in his room. It's inescapable...
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
Covarr said:
albino boo said:
Well he would say that wouldn't he. However all they doing is helping form a wedge issue with soccer mums for the Republicans. If ESA wants to kill the law they should call for the federal imposition of these good French laws. Instead of the present case of Democrats defends chins breads who want to sell your children violent porn, the narrative for Fox would be centrist Republican calls for French laws limiting our freedom of speech. How do you think that would go down with the tea party mob? Shifting the story is what the ESA need to do and not the same old predictable knee jerk reaction the Republicans are counting on.
You, sir, have no idea what you're talking about. This is one issue that has very little to do with party lines, with both supporters and opponents of the law on each side.

Or are people like Hillary Clinton and Joe Lieberman, both avid supporters of video game censorship, Republicans now?

P.S. Thanks
And why do you think they are supporting the law? Might it be that have made the political calculation that they can afford to alienate the chin breads, who aren't going to vote Republican whatever happens. Which 2 Democrats could be running for the 2012 presidential nomination? Oh yeah its Hillary Clinton and Joe Lieberman. I bet if you look down the list of democrats who support the law you will find either that they are in tight races or they are looking at a national run in 2012. The democrats did something similar with the parental advisory labels on music. They used Al Gores wife to push for it while he was VP. Why do you think Al Gore associated himself with that, could it be he had presidential ambitions?

Even if you don't think its political ESA are screwing up. Ever time they put out a statement talking about rights they are agreeing with the premiss of the question

Current

FOX: So Mike Gallagher as head of ESA your against the the Californian law?

Mike Gallagher: Yes we have first First Amendment rights

Fox: So you have a legal right to sell violent and sexually graphic games to our kids?

Mike Gallagher: Errrr.....


What it should be

Mike Gallagher: So Mike Gallagher as head of ESA your against the the Californian law?

Mike Gallagher: Thats a good question. However what the real question is why is the Governor trying to imposes this French law on the American public?

Fox: Errr.....


Esa are only preaching to the converted. The argument about first amendment rights is not going to cut very much ice with the vast majority of the public who don't game. Saying that we have a legal right to sell violent and sexually graphic games to kids is never going to be a popular position. ESA needs to change the story to something else thats a much easier sell to the wider public. Its much easier to get a broad base of public support with the argument about imposing foreign laws than its is with the current strategy. Purely staking everything on a court case is a bad move because you might lose for start and laws can be changed by politicians.