s0m3th1ng said:
Faerillis said:
When it stops being considered surprising movies involving the Old West are usually gonna suck
3:10 to Yuma
This. 3:10 to Yuma, while some say not as thoughtful as the original, still blew away all my expectations about lame modern Westerns. I haven't yet seen True Grit, but not due to any lack of enthusiasm now that I know they're still making good Westerns.
But then, my favorite Western of the modern movie age before 3:10 came out was The Quick and the Dead, an over-the-top effort by Sam Raimi to tell a legendary story in a truly legendary style, much like 300 ultra-pimps the battle at Thermopylae.
Sounds like, with that many writers, the movie suffered from too many cooks in the kitchen. I might trust Orci and Kurtzman with it if it were supposed only to be what was advertised in the trailers: a sci-fi/Western mash-up with such an absurd premise, the only thing it could be is awesome. If it were meant to be allegorical to the crowding out of Injuns by palefaces, then I would think the metaphor would be much more plainly stated, like Section 9 parallels to apartheid, or the Animatrix segment Second Renaissance Part I, which directly recreated iconic images like Tiananmen Square and the execution of Nguyen Van Lem during the Tet Offensive.
But from the sound of it, and I think this would address the confusion about Bob's argument to depth of character, is that the movie suggests all of these things but doesn't actually reveal anything that's not already apparent. The depth is suggested but overplayed, the plot twists are hyped but predictable, the movie effectively is promising but not delivering, whereas Captain America told you exactly what it was and then f-ing did it.
One of the grand axioms of my education in music was that they can love you or they can hate you, but if you bore them, you're done. That may be the ultimate failing of this movie, that it's neither good enough for Bob to love, nor bad enough for him to hate, and forgettable is almost worse than just plain bad.