Yeah, the movie adaptation directors don't seem to handle the emotional weight of Harry's role models' deaths very well (honestly, the only deaths that were accurately and darkly enough portrayed were those of Harry's parents...and that was only a flashback.)WolfmanNougat said:Oh dear. This worries me, considering Sirius' death in OotP was rather lax, too.13lackfriday said:Watch it.WolfmanNougat said:SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE!
In a rather anticlimactic way, I assume.
You'll see how painfully correct you are.
Still, I wonder how Michael Gambon feels about the whole affair... happy to be done with it, maybe?
You don't use spoilers. Same goes for this review actually, very unprofessional.WolfmanNougat said:SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE!
In a rather anticlimactic way, I assume.
The thing is, I'm of two minds on this. On the one hand, it has what seems like a disproportionate amount of space in this one. On the other hand, when all is said and done the HP movies have been set up to (eventually) function as a single MASSIVE multi-generational narrative that'll end up totalling 20+ hours... so given that, having ONE 2 1/2 hour piece of that dedicate to their romantic goings-on probably isn't really overkill at all.ReverseEngineered said:It's a good thing to have as a side show -- it keeps the characters interesting and realistic -- but making it the main focus of the movie turns it into a teenage chick flick. Do we really need another one of those?
I know, I know. But really, it's not like that particular spoiler is a huge secret. After all, fans of the series will already know of it, and internet users would know of it as a meme. And indeed, pretty much nobody else except the casual fans would even care.WrongSprite said:You don't use spoilers.WolfmanNougat said:SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE!
In a rather anticlimactic way, I assume.
What about people who are following the movies rather than the books? Theres a lot of them.WolfmanNougat said:I know, I know. But really, it's not like that particular spoiler is a huge secret. After all, fans of the series will already know of it, and internet users would know of it as a meme. And indeed, pretty much nobody else except the casual fans would even care.WrongSprite said:You don't use spoilers.WolfmanNougat said:SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE!
In a rather anticlimactic way, I assume.
No different than any other dorms, for students who are from out of town. Not everyone can afford their own room in a frat house.MovieBob said:Speaking of which, what sadistic organizational bastard has the older teenagers at Hogwarts still bunking two-or-more to a bedroom? What the hell? No wonder they're so tense, you'd be tense to if you were sixteen (or whatever) and couldn't get a few minutes out of the day to "blow off steam," as it were. Especially since, with the whole moving-photo thing, porno mags for wizards must be out of this world...
Harvey Birdman: Attorney at Law. It's his boss, Phil Ken Sebben [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_Birdman,_Attorney_at_Law#Sebben_.26_Sebben] (voiced by Stephen Colbert)Lemmibl said:I'm curious, who's that blond man with an eyepatch in the "HAHAAA, TENUOUS LITERARY REFERENCES!" clip? I'm not very familiar with comics and stuff.
Thank you.jabrwock said:Harvey Birdman: Attorney at Law. It's his boss, Phil Ken Sebben [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_Birdman,_Attorney_at_Law#Sebben_.26_Sebben] (voiced by Stephen Colbert)Lemmibl said:I'm curious, who's that blond man with an eyepatch in the "HAHAAA, TENUOUS LITERARY REFERENCES!" clip? I'm not very familiar with comics and stuff.
"Do you know what this means to the firm?! The billable hours?! I can finally build that lake house, and I'll run around naked all day. Ha ha... dangly parts."
By far for both. Even with time travel as a major plot point. It still had the "weird wizard fun" but underscored it with just enough serious character development and drama.L.B. Jeffries said:Heh, so true about film 3 being the best. Book 3 was the strongest as well.