Escape to the Movies: John Carter

Recommended Videos

Fat Hippo

Prepare to be Gnomed
Legacy
May 29, 2009
1,991
57
33
Gender
Gnomekin
Hmm, I know his review wasn't all that positive, but I still kind of want to watch it now.
 

orangeapples

New member
Aug 1, 2009
1,836
0
0
Well, I'd have to say that okay is better than most of the crap that gets into theaters, so that's definitely a plus...
 

Plinglebob

Team Stupid-Face
Nov 11, 2008
1,815
0
0
It sounds like its more the fault of internet nerds and film critics then general audiences that helped mess up the story. Both of the former groups seem to want everything to have a reason and are unhappy with the general "It just happens, live it it" excuse where as general audiences don't care.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,453
2,022
118
Country
USA
Funny, Yahtze just did a column about adaptations. Worth reading.

He finds a movie adaptation works best when it is about a shorter idea that the movie can expand. Difficult, not impossible, to make a good movie out of a longer work, but you have to leave things out.

I read the G-dfather: 1/2 of it was about that guy that was like Frank Sinatra, who has like 2 min. on film.
 

ZZoMBiE13

Ate My Neighbors
Oct 10, 2007
1,908
0
0
MovieBob said:
John Carter

Finally the man that influenced modern fantasy gets his own movie.

Watch Video
You're using the smiley faces a lot more these days. Which is fine of course, but they lack the distinction of your Big Picture cutouts.

Why don't you let me draw you some faces you can use in ETTM? They can be caricatures of you or something more zany if you prefer. MovieBobDog [https://twitter.com/#!/ZZoMBiE13/status/173703690090332160/photo/1] maybe? Think about it. :)
 

Xman490

Doctorate in Danger
May 29, 2010
1,186
0
0
Oh, John Carter, the guy who says "Good God, I'm on Mars," in that trailer that played in half of all Youtube partners' videos played.
I really hate autoplaying advertisements on the web, so I therefore loathe this movie's existence.
 

Falseprophet

New member
Jan 13, 2009
1,381
0
0
moviedork said:
lord.jeff said:
I don't like the, it's not exactly like the original therefore it's not as good complaint, the changes could be for the worse but that shouldn't be a complaint in and of it's self.
Precisely. Some of the best movies are vastly different from their source material. I believe that as an adaptation, you need to keep the essence of what made the story popular but be given the liberty to make changes as you see fit. If you don't feel the liberty of making changes to the source material, than you are just a lazy story teller. It did wonders for Lord of the Rings and Christopher Nolan's Batman and other sci-fi/fantasy/comic book movies and it could do wonders for John Carter as well.
Yes, but an adaptation should either still embrace the core theme/idea/tone of the film, or subvert/deconstruct it in a creative way. But taking an established classic and forcing it into the mould of generic, paint-by-numbers 21st century action movie that will be forgotten in a few months--how is that form of adaptation any less lazy than making no changes at all?

I for one am sick of the self-loathing, self-interested hero with a tragic past who Refuses the Call until he doesn't. Why can't we have a few guys who fight evil because it's the right thing to do, or because it's actually fun, or even because it's their job?
 

rayen020

New member
May 20, 2009
1,138
0
0
I feel john carter being made now, in this kind of hollywood, isn't the best idea. But i will give it this, not being bad might be good enough. This is a movie that has been wanted since the invention of feature length movies and most stuff like that gets bought by a studio and turned into something horrible. That this one isn't something totally offensive and that it's getting a major theatre release is a positive.

This is something that the great filmmakers of the future will look back on and want to remake correctly. and hopefully the Hollywood bias against superhero sci-fi will have passed by then.
 

LordLundar

New member
Apr 6, 2004
962
0
0
Can't say the AC3 image really appealed to me.

Oh don't get me wrong, I think it's awesome that it's taking place during the American Revolution which has rarely been given light in a non-strategy game mechanic and I have no issue with that.

No, my issue is with the character design. The artwork could have easily been "Create a colonial era assassin" and instead they went with "take the same damn character as before but slap on some colonial era trinkets for show".

I mean really, look at him. Do you think that the button breast on his coat and blue cloth pinned on the coat tails is going to disguise him?
 

Li Mu

New member
Oct 17, 2011
552
0
0
The Guardian's critic gave it 1 star. So Bob has been quite generous.
Although The Guardian's critic also gave The Artist a very good score, so what does he know?

I find Bob to be hit and miss with regards to my own personal taste. Some films he rates highly I find to be utter trash and others I find to be spot on.
But then, how dull would life be if we all had the same taste and opinions?
 

RJ Dalton

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,285
0
0
"And Jasmine's wardrobe." LOL!

Anyway, I think I'll just check out the original novels. Honestly, I'd never heard of them.
 

PingoBlack

Searching for common sense ...
Aug 6, 2011
322
0
0
I just noticed there was a straight to video production of this in 2009 as well. Princess of Mars.

Wonder if that cheaper B prod movie is more true to books, but from the iMDB description it seems even more messed up.
 

TheFederation

New member
Mar 29, 2011
205
0
0
strange... i hated the princess in this movie and much prefered the green thark women, although she did always get the bad end of the stick (tortued once and captured once for what the two main people did)
 

Swifteye

New member
Apr 15, 2010
1,079
0
0
The flash gordon approach would have still been a failure. This movie never stood a chance it's just too evident of it's timeline. It would be like modernizing double indemnity. Its better just to make something new in spirit rather than revive something technically obscure.