You're using the smiley faces a lot more these days. Which is fine of course, but they lack the distinction of your Big Picture cutouts.MovieBob said:John Carter
Finally the man that influenced modern fantasy gets his own movie.
Watch Video
Yes, but an adaptation should either still embrace the core theme/idea/tone of the film, or subvert/deconstruct it in a creative way. But taking an established classic and forcing it into the mould of generic, paint-by-numbers 21st century action movie that will be forgotten in a few months--how is that form of adaptation any less lazy than making no changes at all?moviedork said:Precisely. Some of the best movies are vastly different from their source material. I believe that as an adaptation, you need to keep the essence of what made the story popular but be given the liberty to make changes as you see fit. If you don't feel the liberty of making changes to the source material, than you are just a lazy story teller. It did wonders for Lord of the Rings and Christopher Nolan's Batman and other sci-fi/fantasy/comic book movies and it could do wonders for John Carter as well.lord.jeff said:I don't like the, it's not exactly like the original therefore it's not as good complaint, the changes could be for the worse but that shouldn't be a complaint in and of it's self.
Assassin's Creed 3.MonkeyPunch said:What's that movie(?) that Bob is way more excited than he thought he would be at the end?