OBZ said:
The 3 top science fiction movies of the 21st century are Equilibrium, Moon, and District 9. Um, aren't you forgetting quite the seminal work?: the Matrix. Your critiquing license should be striped and burned for missing that no-brainer. Although, I'd love to hear your reasoning for leaving the Matrix out (and yes, I know it came out in 1999, but still).
Because it came out in 1999, and thus would be one of the top 3 sci-fi films of the 90's? And if you mention either of the the sequels I will brain you with a table leg.
Just saw Repo Men. I am still trying to decide whether I am happy with what transpired over the last two hours of my life or not. It starts out very much similar to Repo!, save for the world in which the film takes place is mostly bland and uninteresting to look at. Imagine New York with slightly more gigantic floating billboards and you have a basic idea. Blade Runner this is not. Mr. Jude goes about his business of being a certifiable psychopath, repossessing organs and being rather likable as a remorseless killer/family man until said accident occurs and suddenly he's on the other side of the looking glass. This is where I feel his character completely falls apart.
His 180 turn from cool, calm killer to tree-hugging humanitarian is so abrupt and jarring as to make it completely unbelievable. This is a man who has murdered people with surgical precision for years. A veteran of the business who goes about the repo process without so much as batting an eye, and only now does he stop to think that maybe these are actual people with feelings and loved ones? The much more probable scenario is he gets his new heart, takes a quick breather, and then goes back to work with the knowledge that he's safe within the arms of the company he works for as they would probably never kick one of their most important assets to the curb. If anything he would see himself as a testament to the company and living example of the very power he and his employers wield.
Instead he gets cold feet, falls behind on his payments, and the film thus reveals itself for the mindless (though rather well done) action flick that it is. Once he's on the run it is one gore splattered fight scene after another. Surprisingly, this is actually where the film comes into its own. The action is tight and brutal, a well executed affair that left me applauding. So when the "big twist" ending came, one which renders what I consider to be the better half of the movie a mute point, I was left dumbstruck by how unnecessary and out of place it felt. This is not a smart film, it does not have anything worthy to say rather than the obvious and tired tropes that have all been said before and better. Yet it tries to present itself as deep and highbrow while at the same time reveling giddily in the violence on display. After nearly an hour of uncomfortable flip-flopping it had finally settled into the comfortable nook of "brainless action flick" and the unwarranted left turn at the very end left me with a bad taste in my mouth.
And this is coming from a man who LOVES his twists endings. I can't get enough of the "good-guy-fails" motif, when the setting is ripe for it. But I felt like I had just watched John McClane shoot the evil british terrorist only to get hit by a bus as he walks out of the building. Except not nearly as dramatic. This is more like him choking on a peanut on the ride home. It just doesn't work.
PS: And to top it off, the film pretty much tells us that if Jude Law's character HAD stuck it out and repossessed a few dozen organs he would have more than made his payments and ended up scott free, making his predicament even more unlikely.