I think apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic movies are popular not just because, as MovieBob stated, people want to see or imagine how their own character would fare in the harshest of "make-or-break" moments (Or simply given an empty world on a platter, like a real-life sandbox game), but also because people want to see humanity surviving against all odds. These movies are oddly comforting, because they all show humanity continuing to survive in one way or another despite horrible catastrophes and dismal odds. Very hopeful movies, these bleak world-catastrophe flicks. Even the stupidest and bleakest horror of The Mist ends with everything just turning out okay for humanity, right out of the blue. Sort of a common theme, actually... the less chance humanity has to make it through a movie crisis, the bigger the chance is that the filmmaker has a "AND THEN EVERYTHING TURNED OUT OKAY" resolution in mind (Despite it not making any sense). The Happening did the same thing. Terrible movie. Just terrible.
Natural disaster movies are all pretty universally dumb, but 2012 was mildly engaging with a couple of good cast choices and a staggering amount of money thrown into absolutely crazy, pants-wetting visuals. Plus, it didn't pull a "EVERYTHING ENDED UP WITH HUMANITY SURVIVING FOR NO REASON" card out of its ass; it had us really working at that shit to be able to make it. Still a sadly trite flick, with a host of very disappointing characters starring in a cadre of eye-rolling scenes. It's sad that the best natural disaster movie is probably Armageddon, but that's natural disaster for you. Give me weird disasters any day!
Natural disaster movies are all pretty universally dumb, but 2012 was mildly engaging with a couple of good cast choices and a staggering amount of money thrown into absolutely crazy, pants-wetting visuals. Plus, it didn't pull a "EVERYTHING ENDED UP WITH HUMANITY SURVIVING FOR NO REASON" card out of its ass; it had us really working at that shit to be able to make it. Still a sadly trite flick, with a host of very disappointing characters starring in a cadre of eye-rolling scenes. It's sad that the best natural disaster movie is probably Armageddon, but that's natural disaster for you. Give me weird disasters any day!
I agree with you on Six-String Samurai -- it was half terrible (Largely in execution), but half great (Largely in ideas). But I hated A Boy and His Dog, the thing became so pointlessly nonsensical when they went underground that the movie lost me completely. Plus, most of the acting is just shamefully bad. Sorry!shark77 said:Creepy? No, it's a perfectly sensible ending, and given the film, completely fitting. I stand by my assertion that A Boy and His Dog is, fundamentally, a movie about love, which happens to be told in really awesome post-apocalyptic dark humour fashion. (I loved that movie.)sephiroth1991 said:Yay more Movie Bob
OT:Has any one seen "A Boy and His Dog" it's a strange film with a telepathic dog set in some post-apocalyptic future. Had a quite creepy ending.
Six-String Samurai was disappointing. It wasn't bad; but it wasn't completely amazing like I was expecting it to be, given the premise (rock&roll + katanas + post-apocalyptic setting). It started well, and has good ideas, but doesn't execute them all that well. Most of the fights were pretty poor too (barring goofy shifting anamorphic intro and the bowling team fight); there's also only one guitar duel (one of the best ideas for guitarist-swordsman duality), and it's over in about 10 seconds. It was still alright, but don't go in thinking it will be one of the best movies you'll ever see (I am sad).