Escape to the Movies: The Hangover 2

Recommended Videos

Tomster595

New member
Aug 1, 2009
649
0
0
Not nearly as good as the first but not nearly as bad as he said it was.

On the whole transsexual thing, I totally don't agree with Bob. The joke wasn't "eeeew its a transsexual" its "eeew Stu had sex with the transsexual." The joke would have been nearly as effective if it was just a straight up male hooker.
 

Shadow Geo

New member
Mar 24, 2011
63
0
0
Watched the movie. Loved the movie. Just my opinion, I'm sure everyone has one too. Just don't be so quick to judge people!
 

ultrachicken

New member
Dec 22, 2009
4,303
0
0
Chaos999 said:
Hell I can create very good original story?s and I am not a writer.
Everyone thinks this about themselves. Give me an example of why you're the exception.

EDIT: To all the people saying that the transexual joke was not at the expense of the transexual, but instead at the guy who slept with the transexual, you are contradicting yourselves. The joke is that the character had sex with a person who was disgusting because they were transexual, which is still pretty fucking mean spirited.
 

ballsmcgee

New member
Feb 14, 2011
1
0
0
Totally agree with the other comments about Moviebob, I used to agree with most of your thoughts on movies but for the past 2 months or so you seem to just attack mainstream movies. I know that a review is just the critics opinion and your entitled to yours but your getting a bit harsh, yeah hangover 2 wasnt as good as the first one, who honestly expected it to be? And if you did then you're very naive. Its still better than alot of the other crap (Harry Potter). And just so everyone knows, I like fantasy and sci-fi movies, just don't see why people like the HP thing which is just a massive rip-off, but I digress.
 

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
Shadow Geo said:
Watched the movie. Loved the movie. Just my opinion, I'm sure everyone has one too. Just don't be so quick to judge people!
Agreed, I loved this movie and I don't see what was so bad about everything he described. But then again I am one of those people who goes to a movie for enjoyment and does not need every single movie to be something new and different if it makes me laugh it is a good movie.
 

Groundchuck

New member
Apr 16, 2011
40
0
0
Its weird, i think i just watch this now a days to make myself angry. I did not see or think i would like the original Hangover, so that lead me to believe i would not care for this one. Of course the director of the original put out alot of movies i saw and did not care for, i like to think of this as a pattern. Now some of these movies where very popular in turn some got sequels and for better or worse these movies made money. Now other than Movies and video games consistence is golden. Most of us wake up every morning and use the same soap to shower, brush are teeth with the same tooth paste and have a bowl of are favorite breakfast cereal. Not many people complain about Coca Cola "just rehashing the same thing" or their resturant of choice not doing enough to be different. I have seen plenty of movies that are just retreading the same stories over again and people just RAVE about them ( see Man Hunter and Red Dragon) but this to most critics is OK but sequels are the down fall of the motion picture. Not me personally i can't stand Comic book and Video game movie adaptations they never capture the true feeling you get when you read the comics or played the games, If something is not true to its source material I feel it breaks my immersion into it,so movies like Thor all that Avengers hype, either of the Hulks and Iron Man do nothing for me, but The Original Batman and The dark Knight where amazing but i cant put my finger on why??? Oh that's right the acting was top notch and their are no shtick actors in them to break the immersion, I mean really Juno, Super Bad, Scott Pilgram its all the same character, awkward teenager doing stupid crap for love..... GTFO
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
artanis_neravar said:
Shadow Geo said:
Watched the movie. Loved the movie. Just my opinion, I'm sure everyone has one too. Just don't be so quick to judge people!
Agreed, I loved this movie and I don't see what was so bad about everything he described. But then again I am one of those people who goes to a movie for enjoyment and does not need every single movie to be something new and different if it makes me laugh it is a good movie.

Well, you have to understand that Bob is a massive left winger, who doesn't get that the other 50% of the population doesn't agree with him on certain political issues, like the complete and total acceptance of homosexuals/transgenders and other things. He's basically taking an "OMG Grow up" rant because of the realization that massive numbers of people disagree with him, and enough of them to make scenes like the one he is talking about work. He'd like to call it an "epic fail for humanity" without realizing that we're dealing with a big issue, and just as many people on the other side as would agree with him.

Likewise, his politics are largely offended by the idea of using a foreign country/people/culture as the butt of a joke, even when it might be deserved, and be making some valid points. Putting the blame on us for noticing and making a movie about it for some laughs, rather than on a country that could probably be doing better, and is trying to grow up, but not quite getting there. Making fun of nations like Thailand is currently similar to how people used to make fun of Japan, back when Japan was aping the US badly, and "they're really big in Japan" was the height of misdirected humorous put downs, because everyone knew EXACTLY why that was funny. Japan changed, started turning out a solid product, and now gets more respect, and not just from nerds.

To be honest Thailand could have been used interchangably with a lot of differant nations, but right now it's known to be more backwards than most. Bangkok occasionally being referred to as "The Cesspool Of the Orient" largely because it's been a major hub for drugs, slavery, the child sex trade, and other things, while Bangkok has been working to turn it's reputation around, and to be fair there are many places in the Orient that are just as bad especially nowadays, it still has a reputation that sticks to it, and the country as a whole.

Oh yes and this is to say nothing of the infamous Thai pirates. Do a search for "Thai Pirates" and you'll get plenty of hits, but here is a sample link telling only part of the story:

http://vietka.com/Vietnamese_Boat_People/HorribleStatistics.htm

The bottom line is that Thailand is known to be home to a lot of ruthless thugs, who would head out and terrorize/rape/rob/kill people from other asian countries, and any tourist vessels or undefended merchant traffic they could get to. The kind of piracy people are just now becoming aware of due to the stuff largely around Africa.

They heydey of Thai piracy in the modern era was admittedly around the 1980s as you can tell from a lot of the data you'll find on a search. The problem has never gone away, but has notably decreased by all reports.

In short, Thailand is one of those nations that has everything from huge, modern cities, to people living in abject poverty, and much the same way they did during The Middle Ages. You have tourist traps, and areas where armed thugs with assault rifles board boats looking to cause mayhem. It's quite the enviroment. Someone like Bob is going to look at only the huge, modern cities, and not other parts of the countries. Someone who is anti-asian is going to look only at the nastiest parts of the country. The rest of us, are going to view it as a more balanced whole, and the results are't entirely flattering, but also not akin to saying it's a Charlie Chan rerun with everyone living knee deep in rice paddies either.

Thailand right now is one of those areas that goes to great length to protect and patrol it's more touristy areas, so they can show them to the rest of the world. Basically it's a pretty safe tourist destination, with enough of a barbaric undercurrent and hint of danger to attract a bunch of "Bros" like the guys from The Hangover wanting to do something that seems exciting and adventerous, but really isn't to the extent they would like others to believe. A movie like "The Handover" of course involves them hitting some of the more extreme things a person could find, all at once, but at the same time nothing extreme enough to ruin the movie's rating or end with them all being cut to ribbons in an alleyway somewhere.

Basically knowing that you had pirates murdering hundreds of thousands out of Thailand (and from nations around the area admittedly) 30 years ago makes it seem dangerous, especially seeing as there is still some of that around, but they heyday of that has since passed, and while it's still a crime center for all the things I mentioned, the crime is also a bit lower key at least in how it operates, especially around tourists, because everyone wants the tourists. Even the guys running the brothels realize that if they kill tourists for being obnoxious too often, then nobody is going to come into their business, leads leads to a lot of very ruthless people being fairly polite to those with money to spend.

I'm rambling, but the point is that someone like Bob probably doesn't get the situation. Indeed I'd venture a guess he had never even heard of the piracy in the region for example, until I just mentioned it (assuming he actualy read this). He simply sees a foreign culture being used for the butt of a few jokes, and it angers his inner liberal. It's no worse than the occasional joke being made at the expense of the USA, which does happen, in American movies no less.
 

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
Therumancer said:
artanis_neravar said:
Shadow Geo said:
Watched the movie. Loved the movie. Just my opinion, I'm sure everyone has one too. Just don't be so quick to judge people!
Agreed, I loved this movie and I don't see what was so bad about everything he described. But then again I am one of those people who goes to a movie for enjoyment and does not need every single movie to be something new and different if it makes me laugh it is a good movie.
snip
Not gonna lie, I only skimmed that but I got the basic jist I think, and while I understand and agree with your assessment, I should point out that I am also left wing; however I believe that, with all of the horrible stuff that goes on in this world, we need to be able to laugh at anything and everything. I found the scene he was describing extremely funny and not in the "omg trannys are disgusting" way I found how they were reacting to the slowly revealed events that unfolded.

Also feel free to tell me if I missed the point completely
 

Mike Laserbeam

New member
Dec 10, 2010
447
0
0
I'd love to see an Attack The Block review (I imagine it will only be kept as the little note at the end of this video). Loved ATB and I'd really like to hear Bob's opinion! (in full)
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
artanis_neravar said:
Not gonna lie, I only skimmed that but I got the basic jist I think, and while I understand and agree with your assessment, I should point out that I am also left wing; however I believe that, with all of the horrible stuff that goes on in this world, we need to be able to laugh at anything and everything. I found the scene he was describing extremely funny and not in the "omg trannys are disgusting" way I found how they were reacting to the slowly revealed events that unfolded.

Also feel free to tell me if I missed the point completely[/quote]

No worries, at least you skimmed it as opposed to just writing TLDR. :)

My basic issue is with left wing extremists. Bob's basic point seemed to be to pull up a sandbox and say "OMG you can't say anything negative about, or make fun of gay people or foreign cultures! That's wrong!" as a matter of principle, and then basically extend it into something of an attack on anyone who doesn't have a problem with that through the whole "haven't we grown up yet?" thing, acting like he's dealing with a tiny group of people, rather than making judgements on some of the big political issues of the day, when he's not talking to a handfull of aberrants, but roughly 50% of the population and more than enough people to carry a move like this one.

I tend to only get snippy about politics, when someone decides to act like they represent some kind of clear majority, or a position that is obviously right, when issues like that are so divided. It's the very kind of attitude that prevents both extreme left wingers and extreme right wingers from meeting somewhere in the middle which is where the truth actually lies, which makes both sides uncomfortable.

Most surveys and such I've taken measuring overall political belief generally place me as being middle of the spectrum, and in the Republican camp, but close to the wall of libertarianism ( which is odd because I seem to disagree with libertarians on most things ). I'm the guy who gets called a hippy by his far right wing relatives and aquaintences, and some kind of right wing militia nut by the far left wing. As a result when I talk about things like gay rights I typically wind up upsetting well... everyone, yet in the end I think if we're going end problems big issues like that might not settle where I am exactly, but somewhere in that ballpark because even if it takes decades, when all the screaming and yelling is done, that's generally what happened.

The gist of my point about Thailand, was largely to point out that some places really are outside of our range of experience in the US. Poking fun at them does not mean someone is doing it unfairly, or totally out of context to reality. It's sort of like how "Team America: World Police" is a satire of the American take on the political landscape of a few years ago. It was funny because it was true, and a lot of the underlying principles were right, but they were exagerrating it to a ridiculous degree and people could laugh because of the truth in it.... or at least that's how I think most people saw it.

The point here being that just because something is negative, doesn't mean it's untrue, and it doesn't mean liberals should get all upset if someone happens to use it, especially in a somewhat distorted way, for humor within a comedy which is by it's nature not intended to be taken seriously.

Err, wow, sorry about the length, and hopefully you read it. I tend to get carried away. :)
 

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
Therumancer said:
No worries, at least you skimmed it as opposed to just writing TLDR. :)

My basic issue is with left wing extremists. Bob's basic point seemed to be to pull up a sandbox and say "OMG you can't say anything negative about, or make fun of gay people or foreign cultures! That's wrong!" as a matter of principle, and then basically extend it into something of an attack on anyone who doesn't have a problem with that through the whole "haven't we grown up yet?" thing, acting like he's dealing with a tiny group of people, rather than making judgements on some of the big political issues of the day, when he's not talking to a handfull of aberrants, but roughly 50% of the population and more than enough people to carry a move like this one.

I tend to only get snippy about politics, when someone decides to act like they represent some kind of clear majority, or a position that is obviously right, when issues like that are so divided. It's the very kind of attitude that prevents both extreme left wingers and extreme right wingers from meeting somewhere in the middle which is where the truth actually lies, which makes both sides uncomfortable.

Most surveys and such I've taken measuring overall political belief generally place me as being middle of the spectrum, and in the Republican camp, but close to the wall of libertarianism ( which is odd because I seem to disagree with libertarians on most things ). I'm the guy who gets called a hippy by his far right wing relatives and aquaintences, and some kind of right wing militia nut by the far left wing. As a result when I talk about things like gay rights I typically wind up upsetting well... everyone, yet in the end I think if we're going end problems big issues like that might not settle where I am exactly, but somewhere in that ballpark because even if it takes decades, when all the screaming and yelling is done, that's generally what happened.

The gist of my point about Thailand, was largely to point out that some places really are outside of our range of experience in the US. Poking fun at them does not mean someone is doing it unfairly, or totally out of context to reality. It's sort of like how "Team America: World Police" is a satire of the American take on the political landscape of a few years ago. It was funny because it was true, and a lot of the underlying principles were right, but they were exagerrating it to a ridiculous degree and people could laugh because of the truth in it.... or at least that's how I think most people saw it.

The point here being that just because something is negative, doesn't mean it's untrue, and it doesn't mean liberals should get all upset if someone happens to use it, especially in a somewhat distorted way, for humor within a comedy which is by it's nature not intended to be taken seriously.

Err, wow, sorry about the length, and hopefully you read it. I tend to get carried away. :)
This one I did read all of, and I completely understand and agree, and that doesn't happen a lot, kudos
 

Optional Opinion

New member
Dec 29, 2008
323
0
0
It sound like you have an unwarranted grudge, that or you are just doing it for effect.

The scene with the trans isn't like you make it out and I think most people would freak out if they found out they
were on the receiving end of anal sex.

Yes they probably made it for money but most films are like that and it doesn't stop it from being enjoyable.

They used the same theme and yes it wasn't as good as the first but not many sequels are.

It was a good film and doesn't deserve the criticisms you hold.
 

brimstone1392

New member
Feb 3, 2008
51
0
0
This installment of (what will most likely become the) franchise is simple to put in comparative terms:
This movie = the original AS----
Caddyshack 2 = Caddyshack

Yeah... I went there.
 

eljawa

New member
Nov 20, 2009
307
0
0
I always feel angry whenever Movie Bob Opens his mouth. Even though he is right in this instance. Something about him calling Scott Pilgrim the best movie of 2010...Shows that he really doesnt know a whole lot about film.

anyhow, I figure this movie will be a blast on dvd, to sit down with the guys and laugh while eating junk food, but i wasnt gunna see it in theaters regardless.
 

eljawa

New member
Nov 20, 2009
307
0
0
I always feel angry whenever Movie Bob Opens his mouth. Even though he is right in this instance. Something about him calling Scott Pilgrim the best movie of 2010...Shows that he really doesnt know a whole lot about film.

anyhow, I figure this movie will be a blast on dvd, to sit down with the guys and laugh while eating junk food, but i wasnt gunna see it in theaters regardless.
 

SageRuffin

M-f-ing Jedi Master
Dec 19, 2009
2,005
0
0
Hey, some of us like reheated leftovers; sure, it ain't the best, but dammit it'll do the job just as well.

I'm not gonna say anything about the strip club scene outside the fact that I disagree about it. I saw it twice and thought it was funny both times.

Then again, I don't like Extra Credits, am actually enjoying Dragon Age 2, and nigh-religiously listen to [very specific] rap music, so what the fuck do I know?
 

Ohlookit'sMatty

New member
Sep 11, 2008
951
0
0
Well if you liked Hangover part II so much I'm guessin your going to be really buzzed for part 3! And this time they are going to be in Dublin! Woohoo!

-M