Escape to the Movies: The Last Airbender

Recommended Videos

HardRockSamurai

New member
May 28, 2008
3,122
0
0
This movie is bad guys, trust me. However, it's definitely in the "it's so bad it's hilarious." I'd recommend seeing it, as long as you plan on laughing through the whole thing instead of taking it seriously...and don't bother paying for 3D, it's pointless in this film.
 

maximara

New member
Jul 13, 2008
237
0
0
craftyandy said:
I highly doubt this will be enjoyable beyond superficial. First off the movie shouldn't have to explain everything so damn much and treat the audience so stupidly when the show was never like that. But then again I have to go see it first to really judge it. Just that the rotten tomatoes score is pretty fucking scary right now with only 10% and I don't want to waste my good money on a crappy adaptation of a grand story that is on par with Lord of The Rings, Harry Potter, and Star Wars episode IV through VI
I think the thought was since each season is called a "Book" it could be handled it like Lord of The Rings not realizing that unlike many anime Airbender did NOT start out as a manga and there was very little "filler" as is common with many such adaptations. As a result the character go infodump on the audience so they have an idea of WHAT is going on.
 

PixelJunk

New member
Jun 28, 2010
60
0
0
After watching the film myself...

I whole heartedly agree with the following statement.


"Wow, this makes Dragonball Evolution look like a masterpiece."
 

Lynxan

New member
Dec 6, 2009
82
0
0
I had seen it a little bit ago and while I do have to agree with what the review said, I do have to say that I liked it overall. I do like the movie and while I do have to say that I was a bit tired of being told things I already knew and a lot of it just seems to not had been needed for the movie here.

Now I don't think this is all bad though I hate to think that this might be the only part if this don't do well. I have a feeling that the second (and third if they get that far) will be a huge improvement since things are for the most part have gotten all the back story down (even if it took too much of the movie to do it). It's kind of like how Spiderman 2 was better then the first because it didn't have to spend have the movie getting Peter to Spiderman.

I do admit that I did find the 'more accurate' names grating, but who thought that the word Avatar needed more then one ways to say it (or maybe it was accents, but the guy dictating the opening should have been able to say it right). Last I checked that's a rather modern word so I can't see it needing to have a bunch of ways to say it.

Well, time will tell, time will tell.
 

aciid_raiin

New member
Apr 13, 2009
10
0
0
Its better than Eclipse? Hell a turd flung at a wall is better than eclipse. But as for this movie, im a fan of the animated series, so im going to go see it.
 

munsterman

New member
Nov 22, 2009
64
0
0
So I just skipped to the end of the comment so sorry if this has been brought up before or has no bearing to the current discussion.

I saw the movie. Yes the sets, costumes and props were great, yes the bending looked cool (if a little slower to use than in the show). But this movie sucked. I've seen the series and I like it, I went with my roommate who has never seen the series and we both agree this movie was horrible.

I didn't mind the changes to the story but the changes in the characters (They seemed flat with none of the personality of the original show) really annoyed me. Me roommate actually walked out of the movie he thought the acting was so bad.

But there are two sides to every coin. When the credits started rolling and I let out a sigh of relief its was over. Other people in the theater stood up, clapped and cheered the movie like it was the greatest thing they ever saw.

So maybe I'm prejudice against the movie but I will go see the sequel if they release it.
 

Riven Armor

New member
Mar 1, 2010
96
0
0
Uber Waddles said:
To everyone argueing about race issues: Who gives a damn?

Let me give you a brief run down of things... This is made by a director who desperately wants to be in the limelight in HOLLYWOOD. HOLLYWOOD, and MAINSTREAM movies like to sell to a certain demographic of people. While you can argue all day that its wrong, HOLLYWOOD WHITEWASHES FILMS.
And you're pretty much cool with it? Seriously, why post this? We already know.
 

Likes2snipe

New member
Jul 7, 2010
1
0
0
I am very disappointed in This movie. It came from such as great series......

The Acting was terrible, I thought they specially wanted these actors because they played their roles so greatly. I don't mind their race as long as they are good actors.


The fact that they've done so much to change the movie from its original inspiration bothers me.

1) New pronunciations for the main characters names...
-M Night Shamylan felt the need to correct the fans by pronouncing names differently from how people already recognized them. Even if it was technically correct, it was not good taste.

2) Removing of some of the original Asian influence.
-One of the main characters (Iroh) now drinks Coffee instead of tea.......
This really bothered me because Tea has deep roots in many asian cultures, and has much symbolism behind it.
For this main character (Iroh) to drink Tea, it symbolizes his Patience, soothing personality, humbleness, peacefulness, etc. For the director to change that just feels like disregard for its importance....
I was also bothered when they removed the Asian characters from the logo because that's how I came to recognize it. When I saw the Live action poster, I thought to myself, WHATS thIS? lol

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7a/Avatar-TLAlogo.jpg

But *sighs* its too late to change anything now.
 

captainfoss

New member
Apr 21, 2010
306
0
0
I am going to be honest with you friend. Yea, there was plenty of interesting and good moments but being at all a fan of the original nickelodeon hit would conclude this movie a definite fail. The appearance wasn't half bad by no means but the chosen actors were the first strike and the plot/story resulted in the 2nd and 3rd strike. In my personal opinion, I would say that the appearance isn't enough to redeem the failing half of this movie. It's close to passing in my book but sadly I'm going to have to leave it on the fail as yea it
s better then Eclipse, But stand alone, not so much.
 

Riggnarok

New member
Nov 3, 2009
44
0
0
I agree that it is a better movie compared to Eclipse, however that is where I stop. This movie was terrible and you pretty much summed up why. However, the fight scenes were horribly choreographed and would have been perfect, but they just seemed over done.

It felt like I was watching them break-dance to bend the elements, while in the cartoon they just seemed to flow with it. Anyways, personally I don't recommend any hardcore fans to go see this movie. Too many people walked out of it when I was there, and the fact that half the audience booed at the end of it is a clear indication that it failed. Can't say he didn't try though.
 

Fishir

New member
Nov 30, 2008
9
0
0
Just wondering, but where was Zuko's scar? In the series you couldnt miss it, it took up half of his face... Everything else was pretty bad, 20 earthbenders spending a good ten to fifteen seconds on flailing about to move a rock the size of my head, breaking it into pebbles and tossing those at firebenders.

I dont know how you could give it such a good review, the acting was like wood, important things rushed "they became really good friends". Sokka and Suki's relationship condensed into one sentence. The movie seemed to drag on, it was grueling. If i wasnt such a fan of the series, I would have left.

The mispronunciation of name of many of the main characters as well as Avatar (pronounced AHHvatar, as though this were some English noble word). There was really only one good thing, and that would be the Northern water temple, I thought it looked cool. Either way, not worth the 13.50 + whatever popcorn and drink costs. I seriously want my money back.

Also, was a fat Iroh (not EEhroh) too much to ask for? A beloved character, jovial and wise turned stale.
 

Malisteen

New member
Mar 1, 2010
86
0
0
Shyamalan was always a terrible choice for this material. He doesn't have a sense of humor, for one. Avatar was all about balancing the serious with the silly, the depressing with the joyful. The most damning review of this film I've heard was something along the lines of:

"The film not only refuses to let Aang smile, it doesn't even understand why we might want to see that."

All the joy sucked out, and replaced with lifeless exposition delivered by a cast as whitewashed and wooden as a picket fence? Yeah, I think I'll skip this one.
 

Cosplay Horatio

New member
May 19, 2009
1,145
0
0
MAVP [http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/lO-WZpWMeaoJM7kKSdBHVA?feat=embedwebsite]Click again to see the video from my Picasa Account and yes, it's in a theater showing eclipse.
I've fulfilled my promise. Instead of making a poster I've made a sign that says Mormon Abstinence Vampire Porn. The proof is in the pic you see now and the video in the spoiler section.


As far as The Last Airbender, It's pretty much spot on what MovieBob says and I had no idea that they'd miss-pronounce the characters names.

Aang beomea Aung

Sokka becomes Souka

Airo becomes Eero

and so on and so forth.
 

Lien

New member
Jan 11, 2010
11
0
0
Aasiv Mandi is badass... And that's pretty much the only upside. But in the end, i agree totally with movie bob... Except that the village was awesome! Seriously, what's his problem! grr...

And for all the pronunciation haters, do i have to remind you guys that in the cartoon show, everyone was voiced by retarded Nickelodeon American stereotype actors? (not that it was bad, just really annoying)
It reminded me how U.S generals don't know how to pronounce the country they're "Liberating" (It's EE-raq! NOT Ay-raq, darn it!) and yet they claim to know better.
I liked how the name was pronounced true to the Asian culture the cartoon was based on and so did the show's creator.

Too bad the film sucked in the end...

PS: And what does Mormons got to do with twilight? As a latter day saints follower, i feel very offended by that notion, don't compare us to glittering emo vampires! I'd rather say twilight's about puritans (get it? cause they ruin all the fun!).
 

Technicka

New member
Jul 7, 2010
93
0
0
There is no such thing as a correct Asian pronunciation. M. Night really just needs to shut up with that garbage. Asia is a large collection of different countries with a bunch of different languages - how in the hell is there only one way to say a name? Hell, even in the English language you can have two people say the same word differently and still be correct.

Trying to review the movie and ignoring the fact that it's supposed to be an adaptation of a franchise is akin to grading on a curve, imho. Isn't that the idea behind adapting existing properties? You want the (in theory) instant support of the already established fanbase, and then you want to draw in new potential money wells; a 1 - 2 hour commercial, if you will. Nothing wrong with that...unless the commercial sucks.
 

Xalphin

New member
Mar 5, 2009
6
0
0
Honestly, this is the first review I have ever seen by MovieBob, and it was only by accident. However after hearing his review after seeing the movie I can say I will never watch another one of his reviews again.

The Last Airbender is one of the worse and most insulting to the fanbase movies of all time. M.Knights hubris seems to be reaching peek levels.


1. Half the names are pronounced incorrectly. When questioned about this M.Knight merely said, just cause he likes it better, even though any fan of the show cringes when they hear "Ahng" or "Soeka". To try and claim that M.Knight cares about authentic pronunciation is ludicirious because a) He changed the racial ethnicity of all characters, and b) the show does not take place on Earth and the racial ethnicity while hinted at is never CLEARLY explained, and seems to a mixture of many cultures.

2. The bending powers and how they are used is completely changed. In the show, the animators model each style of elemental bending after a specific martial art. Each movement of the body corresponding with control and movement of the element. In the movie, the characters are required to do a whole dance of choreography before we visually see anything happen, leaving a very awkward visual display. The characters were no longer bending elements as extension of their body rather conjuring them with magic alla Narutoesque hand techniques or Harry Potter style magic. Couple this with the act the fact that the sheer power the characters in the movie have is only a fraction of those in the show.

3. a)Everything about the fire nation was wrong. Zuko's giant trademark burn which represents the entirety of his character is reduced to a small black smudge under his eye and a scratch mark on the side of his head. b) The firebenders suddenly cannot make their own fire unless they are masters. This leads to very silly displays such as fire nation soldiers running around with torches everywhere. Instead of shooting giant blasts of flames, we get dinky little fireballs which seem completely ineffective. Combined with the lack of skull masks that they wore in the show destroys the atmosphere of fear and power associated with them. In the show you never questioned how the fire nation took over. They seemed ruthless, powerful, and intimidating. None of this shows up in the movie. c) As Ebert said, the villains lacked "teeth-gnashing." None of the villains came across scary or intimidating, rather they came off as conniving schemers. In the show we don't even see the fire lord in the first season except in shadows and representations of a giant man bathed in fire, and when we do finally see him, we are not disappointed.

4. There is zero character. No personality of any character is shown. Aang's happy and detached feeling of suppressing guilty and fear, Sokka's comedic yet leader like quality as well as his intellect,Kitara's mother quality and passion for justice, yet control freak quality etc etc. They are merely talking heads moving from one scene to another leading to a completely empty and boring movie.

5. The general feeling of rushedness. One cannot expect to encompass the entire first season of a show in to a 90-100min long movie. This movie needed to be at least in the 120-150 min range. There is literally a scene in the movie where narration tells us, "And then Sokka met the princess and they became the best of friends" This is a movie. You can't just tell us what we are suppose to feel. Has M.Knight never heard of show not tell? Coupled that with only part Bob seemed to get right with the fact that every piece of dialogue was merely exposition.

6. Complete change of themes and the last battle: For some reason M.Knight decided to change the main theme of the movie. You know the one that kids relate to. Adults placing large amount of responsibility on children who only want to play and be free. Suddenly we are told that Aang doesn't want to be the avatar, not because of the responsibility of saving the world seems like a huge burden to an 8 year old child, rather because he is told that he cannot have a family. Which is not even true as all the previous avatars were shown to have families and kids which becomes a very very very important plot point later in the series.

Than we have this coupled with Avatar Roku (which is never explained that he is the dragon in the movie,)telling Aang that the avatar is not suppose to hurt people. This is completely untrue. The avatar is suppose to retain balance at all cost. This leads to one of the most interesting developments in the series when Aang doesn't want to kill the Fire Lord, yet all his previous incarnations tell him he must. Aang must grapple whether to sacrifice his own spiritual beliefs for the good of the world, or can he find another way?

This in turn leads to the abysmal ending sequence which takes out the BEST part of the first season. No longer does Aang turn into a giant elemental water spirit, which could provide a fantastic visual display in a movie, and completely defeats the fire nation army. No, instead he makes a really big wave and they just run away. Yes our scary bad guys just run away.

M. Knight I will never see another movie you ever make and hope no one gives you a cent to make another movie ever again.
 

Spectre39

New member
Oct 6, 2008
210
0
0
I figured I would hitch my opinion from another thread to this one...

I never really watched Avatar, so I can't really compare what went wrong with character traits or those aspects of the adaptation.

What I did have problems with were two factors, bad abridgment and awkward crossover.

By "bad abridgment" I mean that much of the content had to be either omitted, or was narrated in way that went over weird.

Example One: Prince Zuko's explanation of his past was summed up in a weird way. He had to bring in this little street kid to out of the blue, explain why he was exiled. The whole time, Zuko was filling in the insider details despite the fact that he was in disguise trying to blend in at that village. It was a bad way of forcing a means to communicate to the audience the information about his relationship with his father, the king.

Example Two: The relationship between Sokka and Princess Yue was very unbelievable. The concept was introduced to the audience via narration. We had nothing to go upon other than their word that it was true. The chemistry between the actors was bland, and their supposedly flirtatious dialog was laughable. The odd timing of the sudden character change was messed up too. Earlier in the movie Sokka mentions that he's fiercely protective of his sister Katara, but as soon as Yue comes along he seems to forget entirely. And in the last scene of that dynamic when Yue is about to sacrifice herself for the Moon Spirit, she says to Sokka "I'll miss you, more than you know". Right, sure. I've been shown this, how exactly?

By "awkward crossover" I mean that they tried to make this film appeal to adult audiences while remaining close to its childlike source material. This resulted in some strange friction.

Example One: The action scenes tried to be exciting, but there was no realistic combat damage. In live action warfare, you expect there to be some sort of consequences for hand to hand combat with sharp objects. But I never saw anyone run through, or even slashed with a weapon. Most of them seemed to be either struck with a blunt object or some elemental attack. The elemental attacks being non-lethal in many cases. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest was also kind of family oriented, but they made sure you knew who had been stabbed. Therefore, you got the impression that nobody was really killed as a result of battle, but merely "knocked out". That's why when Commander Zhao was attacked by four water benders, you expect him to have simply been knocked out. All they did was cover him in water. But, apparently he was the only person mentioned to be killed in combat.

Example Two: Really immature diction. Diction being "a writer's choice of words". It seemed like most of the dialog was painfully simple and never seemed to get above the level of a 10-year-old. The best example of this was Katara's Grandmother. An elderly woman who appeared to be pushing 60 or so had the worst way of conveying the concept that she had a way with prophecy and divination. She said and I quote, "I found out your destiny today". I may be a bit picky with this, but the phrase "found out" is so inappropriate for that moment. You would expect that from a little kid, but not an elderly adult.

Example Three: Dumb kiddies doing dumb kiddie things ruining the immersion of the film. There was this tense standoff between Aang and these Fire Nation guards at an earth bender concentration camp. Aang is trying to reveal that he's the Avatar for the first time in the movie. The guard is skeptical and says that the avatar has to be an air bender, and they are extinct. The audience is expecting Aang to display a show of force, maybe some shock and awe to prove his power. But no. Dumb girl Katara runs up to the guard and shoves him crying "Leave him alone!". To which the guard is about to retaliate, when Aang is forced to jump in and save her with air bending techniques. I had to face palm at this, because things were shaping up for a much more mature way of introducing Aang's abilities, but out of the blue dumb kiddies had to be predictably irrational. That scene totally brought to mind the lesson of dumb kiddies doing dumb things in The Patriot. Remember when Heath Ledger is taken into custody by the British in front of his family? And the dumb kid brother runs up and tries to break him free in a fit of rage, but gets shot by the British officer played by Jason Isaacs. It proved a point to me that dumb kids that assault armed bad guys with no plan other making a scene get killed fast. It's that sort of childish immaturity I wasn't expecting in a film made to appeal to adults.

-----

That said, I thought they did a decent job with Uncle Iroh. He had to be my favorite actor/character. Though that must be because with that beard and being engulfed by flames he reminded me of Sarumon.