technically its the third movie in the series not a sequel. No one(except for you maybe) considers the 3rd movie to be a sequel to the 2ndThe Pink Pansy said:No offense man, but these days I automatically assume sequels are cheap knockoffs until proven otherwise, regardless of who makes it.AgDr_ODST said:ITS Pixar! They'd NEVER do that to the last movie in thier flagship series. or have you been living under a rock for so long (namely between TS2 and now) that you've forgotten that Pixar never half way does anythingThe Pink Pansy said:And here I thought this was going to be a cheap, knock-off sequel. Might have to see this.
Yeah, no kidding. I'm glad he did this one and not Jonah Hex. It's got that Transformers chick in it which has an Intelligence and Wisdom of -4, so the average Intelligence of that picture is...what, -3?The Philistine said:Let's see... review the last in a series of movies that have been routinely good and popular for a wide audience or review an action movie based off a little known DC character that will probably be quickly forgotten amidst all the other action movies at best.Haseo21 said:Jesus christ!
Why the hell did he do this movie and not Jonah Hex?
I'm glad Bob went for the movie that will almost without fail have more depth![]()
Dude, the definition of `sequel`is something that follows something else. Therefore, each movie in a series is the sequel to the movie that came before, rendering your argument null. The argument you`re making is also invalid, as there is no overarching story to the 3 Toy Story movies. Each movie has a self contained story; the only aspect that transfers from each movie to the next are the characters and some of the setting. A series of movies assumes there is a consistent plot overarching the events of all the movies. Now enough of this; I don`t want to start a flame war.AgDr_ODST said:technically its the third movie in the series not a sequel. No one(except for you maybe) considers the 3rd movie to be a sequel to the 2ndThe Pink Pansy said:No offense man, but these days I automatically assume sequels are cheap knockoffs until proven otherwise, regardless of who makes it.AgDr_ODST said:ITS Pixar! They'd NEVER do that to the last movie in thier flagship series. or have you been living under a rock for so long (namely between TS2 and now) that you've forgotten that Pixar never half way does anythingThe Pink Pansy said:And here I thought this was going to be a cheap, knock-off sequel. Might have to see this.
dear god yeah seriously. that scene still scares the hell out of me for no good reason other than it did when i was 6dashiz94 said:that's great to hear it's a faithful and perfect sequel. that said....
WHY THE FUCK DID YOU BRING UP THAT SCENE FROM THE BRAVE LITTLE TOASTER?!?!?!? Do you know how LONG it took me to forget that!? DO YOU?!
What? Would you rather he was saying he saw the movie but thought it sucked?Woodsey said:Please tell me you're not saying you've never seen Toy Story 2...Soylent Bacon said:Wait wait wait, Toy Story 2 is good?? And Toy Story 3 is good???
I seem to have made the fatal mistake of judging a book by its cover, I wrote these two off as crappy sequels milking a franchise, Shrek style.
Okaaaaaay, not quite sure what that second paragraph has to do with anything on these boards, but anyway...Twinmill5000 said:Two things. First, I'm watching this movie. I have to. I've seen Toy Story countless times as a kid.
Second... it looks like GoW3 might be doing alot of things right mechanic-wise, meaning that it could be a good, solid game. I'm personally stoked for Medal of Honor, due to the fact that I have deep post-divorce childhood memories invested into it. Don't give me the crap about the modern youth ending up as hollow shells based on the games they play, because unless I exceed physical, gain the ability to make 500 yard shots, completely degrade my sensitivity and join the marines and become a scout sniper, that's just not gonna happen.
No one, except for him and literally everyone else ever.AgDr_ODST said:technically its the third movie in the series not a sequel. No one(except for you maybe) considers the 3rd movie to be a sequel to the 2ndThe Pink Pansy said:No offense man, but these days I automatically assume sequels are cheap knockoffs until proven otherwise, regardless of who makes it.AgDr_ODST said:ITS Pixar! They'd NEVER do that to the last movie in thier flagship series. or have you been living under a rock for so long (namely between TS2 and now) that you've forgotten that Pixar never half way does anythingThe Pink Pansy said:And here I thought this was going to be a cheap, knock-off sequel. Might have to see this.