Escape to the Movies: Transformers: Dark of the Moon

Recommended Videos

SamuelT

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2009
3,324
0
41
Country
Nederland
elitestranger1 said:
your not alone im tired to.

hey u wanna go see transformer?
no damn it
y not its a good movie
you said terminator 4 and wolverine were good! y am i even friends with u! RAGE!

no matter how much we try to drill sense into brainless mainstream audiences they never listen and the results are irritating (by which i refer to the undeserved large sum that collects in bays back pocket)
Alright mate. Even you must see the irony of calling your friends out for being brainless and mainstream while you don't even take the time to properly spell or write words.

OT: Eh. I'm going with some friends, we'll see some stuff blow up, pair it with a few drinks and we'll all have a good time. That's an evening, and ?10,- well spent.
 

Avistew

New member
Jun 2, 2011
302
0
0
Liudeius said:
That guy's name is Shia Lebo?
Shia LaB?uf. Which is one of the worst names you can possibly have in French, honestly. Not only does his last name means the steer (with a female the) but his first name is pronounced like something nasty.
 

Zing

New member
Oct 22, 2009
2,069
0
0
Still Life said:
Zing said:
Maybe you shouldn't be a movie reviewer if you're so "tired"?

Stop complaining. It is not interesting to listen to.
He's proffered a better argument on the state of then industry than you have.
No he didn't. He is complaining in a video that is suppose to be entertaining. Instead it's just annoying.
 

kab040

New member
Oct 22, 2010
13
0
0
When I first saw that they were going to make a Transformers movie, I was like, "Sweet giant robots attacking the shit out of each other, I pay to see that". And what do we get? Shia Lebouf and his issues. Through out the three films is been about Shia and ( insert ugly girlfriend here) and some military/ government guys.

Now it has been said many times...but I'm going to say it again.
Transformers is about Robots that can turn into fucking vehicles fighting other robots that can do the same.


Also if your getting upset about something some guy said on the internet about a specific /nonspecific group of people...get over yourself.
 

Still Life

New member
Sep 22, 2010
1,137
0
0
Zing said:
Still Life said:
Zing said:
Maybe you shouldn't be a movie reviewer if you're so "tired"?

Stop complaining. It is not interesting to listen to.
He's proffered a better argument on the state of then industry than you have.
No he didn't. He is complaining in a video that is suppose to be entertaining. Instead it's just annoying.
To you, maybe. I also think you're wrong about the primary motive however, it still entertained me.

*Edit

Also, I see don't some magically more insightful critique from you.
 

wildcard9

New member
Aug 31, 2008
131
0
0
Looks like this summer movie season is going to be dismal. At least last year we got a good Pixar film, a Nolan film, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, and a dark horse favorite from Ben Affleck. This year? Cars 2 sucks and I'm not much of a Marvel fan.

*sigh* at least the aforementioned films are on DVD now...
 

RDubayoo

New member
Sep 11, 2008
170
0
0
CliveStaples said:
Transformers wasn't about Transformers?
No, it wasn't. It was about Douchey Human and his team of "hilarious" comic relief characters.

And you couldn't tell the difference between the Transformers' personalities? You couldn't distinguish Bumblebee from Optimus Prime, or the two little dudes?
Okay, so Prime had a personality. Bumblebee... uh, what was his personality? "Likes to save Sam?" The two little dudes? Who? Skids and Mudflap? Yes, let's praise their personalities for a moment, good point. Or maybe you meant the two little dudes in the new movie. Well, I haven't seen it, but I've heard these guys are also aggravating.

Well, that's one guy with a personality, someone who saves the protagonist a lot, and a host of annoyances. I concede the point, sir!

Seems like you're mad that they didn't have a bigger stable of characters.
Wha...what? No, I'm mad because the characters were either window dressing or aggravating. We don't need MORE of that, come on.

You didn't like Sam? Or you didn't care, because you wanted to see Transformers! : The movie with only Transformers in it, because fuck adaptations.
No, I didn't like Sam, and no, that's not what I said. We can have human characters in our Transformers movie, sure. The original source material featured them quite frequently. But the Transformers were the stars, that's the thing. In Bayformers, they always take a back seat to human characters who aren't very compelling anyway, so... what? How could that possibly be considered a good thing?

Oh, so the movie needs to be targeted exactly at your preferences, but not at your demographic?
No. We can have a movie that can be all enjoyed by all ages. It is not necessary to resort to frat-boy levels of humor, which--and this is what I'm desperately trying to convey to you--is insulting to an older audience and inappropriate for a younger audience.

Yes, that's a ridiculous statement. Transparently so.

People are still nostalgic for TFTM because they saw it 20 years ago without applying the same critical apparatus. My point is that if you would have seen it using the critical apparatus you're using against Bay, you'd have fucking hated the original too.
No, because the original TFTM didn't suffer from all the disadvantages that Bay's film has and which I just discussed. While cheesy, it has a lot of memorable scenes and quotable lines. Hell, the opening scene with Unicron devouring Lithone is worth the price of admission by itself. That's why people remember it. But what we can remember from the Bayformers movies aside from "I guess Megan Fox was hot" or "It was cool when the robot blew up"? Wait, hold on, there is one thing. "I am underneath the enemy's scrotum!" Yeah, I'm going to remember that forever.

Kill me.

True, but you could level the same 'measuring up to potential' argument against the original. "Imagine how much better this could have been!" is not a persuasive argument that the product isn't enjoyable. "It could have been more enjoyable than it is" may be true, but it doesn't show where you are on the entertainment spectrum.
What? Give me a break. Of course anything could be better, but if we're handed a terrible product then it's within our rights to look at the problems with it and try to imagine how it could be better. If we didn't do that we'd all be driving uncomfortable cars with horrible gas mileage and explode when they're in low-speed collisions.

If I'm a carpenter who hates carpenting and I build a crappy, ugly house, and I'm criticized by comparing my house to a house made by a better carpenter who loves his job, that's a perfectly legitimate argument. If people say my house could have been better if the superior carpenter had made it, that's legit. If people say my house could have been better if I gave a damn, that's also legit. And I can make those exact same comparisons with Bayformers to other movies based on "geeky" franchises (say, Iron Man or the new Star Trek) and which were made by people who CARED. Do you understand? The Bayformers movies are bad, at least in part, because Michael Bay doesn't give a rats' ass about Transformers. That is the entire reason for my original first three complaints, and if you don't understand then I don't know what else to tell you.
 

moretwocents

New member
Jan 20, 2011
75
0
0
For me, the first one was stupid, but enjoyable, if you focused on the few memorable songs and action scenes. The second one insulted me so much I didn't even want to be human. The third was better than the second, if only because it didn't dwell in the toilet humor as much as the second did.

They were all bad movies, just like Bob says. I wouldn't wish the second movie upon my worst enemy, though.
 

ProjectTrinity

New member
Apr 29, 2010
311
0
0
Scripts like these or better [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvNg_SVmxTk] for me. If your script / game / movie *needs* people to defend it with "If you don't shut your brain off to enjoy the movie, you're not open-minded enough / not using your brain enough", then you're probably defending a pretty bad movie. The logic doesn't even make sense.

^ That's why using your brain is a good thing, friends!
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
Formica Archonis said:
Onyx Oblivion said:
I like Transformers. AND YES. EVEN THE BAYSPLOSIONS. And I like Shia, too.

WHY SHOULD I NOT VOTE AND DRIVE BOB?
Because you're obviously an inferior being and should be locked up or something. I mean, we let people with IQs of 50 vote and drive but you Transformers fans should be put on an island with the pedophiles [http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20005372-503544.html] or something. </sarcasm>

Honestly, I don't like Bay's movies and agree with some of Bob's points but this sort of self-superior Jimquisition-esque trying-to-be-Yahtzee-and-failing insult-the-audience ranting is just.... It's the reason I don't recommend MovieBob to people. Ever. I watch the reviews, yes, because he's one of the few reviewers who tends to be more hit than miss with me. But he just goes off on these tangents like he hasn't gotten over junior high yet.

It's kind of like knowing a guy who's really great, and you like him, but once a year at random he just starts screaming racist jokes in public for no reason. You like the guy and want to be around him but you're too petrified you're going to be there when he goes off and you don't want to be associated with that, so you visit but never go out in public with him.
Thanks for this. Bob managed to really piss me off with this review and fell to his knees worshiping Megan Fox while Ironically not realizing she's an even bigger emotionally devoid Bimbo than her replacement. HA!

I'm sorry Bob but you need to stop your little self-righteous bullshit about taste in movies.
While I agree that the movies had their flaws, Bob was just looking for some flame bait in my opinion and was doing everything in his review to try and piss off anyone and I mean ANYONE who dared to enjoy the movie even for a second.

Elitist Prick *spits*
 

CODE-D

New member
Feb 6, 2011
1,966
0
0
cthulhumythos said:
but the real question is, is this as good as transformers: the movie?

and is transformers ruined FOREVER?

http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Ruined_FOREVER
transformers: the movie wasnt that great
honestly its a good movie, stop whining and go see it.
 

Flunk

New member
Feb 17, 2008
915
0
0
I don't think Michael Bay knows anything about directing movies. After the first Transformers (which I loved as a child) I swore off any movie made by him for life. I hope someone else gets the franchise next and makes a real transformers movie, not one about Sam Witwicky who can die in a fire for all I care.
 

Chrissyluky

New member
Jul 3, 2009
985
0
0
Oh my god the picture you brought up when you mentioned the weak twist, that is the best kick in the teeth you can give M. Night Shyamalan.
 

mikespoff

New member
Oct 29, 2009
758
0
0
I do find it hilarious that the video was preceded by a trailer for Transformers.

Someone didn't think that through... :)
 

thefunk686

New member
Jul 28, 2009
17
0
0
Will there ever be a movie-reviewer who doesn't feel the need to bash explosion/action porn (what I refer to most Michael Bay films as)?

You all hate the plot, the characters, and even the visuals are never enough to make any reviewer happy. I get this. I could have told you that anyone who thinks themselves a legitimate film critic was going to touch on all of these things when talking about this movie.

So why do you even bother? Everyone already knows what they're getting with this movie, and all you can contribute is insults to people who occasionally enjoy this?

If you think that these people should go see one of your other big blockbuster action films, why don't you review that instead?

Could it possibly be that you're only in it for the money? If so, you're just as bad (if not worse) than Bay, and you shouldn't be so abusive of what he does, because it only makes you look more like an ungrateful snob.
 

Aureliano

New member
Mar 5, 2009
604
0
0
Please nerds, help me out here. Now that I've watched Transformers 3: Dickloads of twits' Money, I have to ask the question. Why did Sentinel betray the Autobots AFTER he woke up on Earth and the Autobots were basically winning the war against the Decepticons?

Did he have an ironclad contract with the group whose name has the word 'decept' in it? Were they holding his robo-penis hostage until he forked over the teleporter? Did Optimus hide grandpa's haldol? Is he gay for Starscream? Is Optimus just really that much of a failure that Sentinel refused to lead the tool brigade again now that Damsel in Distress Prime has been in charge for three movies?
 

koroem

New member
Jul 12, 2010
307
0
0
Podunk said:
koroem said:
ZeroMachine said:
Although I'm not doubting how shitty this movie is, I said it before and I'll say it again:

STOP INSULTING THE AUDIENCE THAT LIKES IT.

It isn't funny. It isn't witty. It isn't some great statement on how "the people are at fault for bad movies". It does nothing but make you look like a dick.

Rip the movie to shreds. Call it every insult in the book. But STOP insulting those that do like it. Personal taste in movies does not have a direct correlation with intelligence.
I agree with this 100%

I'm a Transformers fan, I saw the movie and I enjoyed it. Did it have it's issues. Sure. Do I hate Bay's take on it. Sure. Do I wish the movies were more about the bots themselves? Sure.

Is this an emmy winner? Probably not unless it is for sound design or special effects.

Having said that, while I agree with some points in this review, it is absolutely clear that this guys movie reviews are growing increasingly bias. It is almost as if he is trying to become the Yahtzee of movie reviews lately, without outright saying he is and trying to maintain credibility. Yahtzee at least has a charming humor about him when he does it though. Bob just sounds like a depressed life hater when he rants.

I won't be watching these reviews anymore. It isn't because I'm butt hurt over him bashing Transformers, or other movies, but because these reviews feel increasingly unprofessional, and more of fan boy depression rants.
I'm sorry, but do you have any idea of just how much you sound like an absolute tool? "Did the movie suck? Sure. Did it make me cough up a small quantity of blood? Sure. But I enjoyed it. Because shut up that's why." If you like bad things then that is your problem, but people do not have to agree with you and you have to learn to live with it because they will think less of you for it. Whether it's the Transformers movie or Sonic '06 if you like things that are certifiably bad for definable reasons not based on opinion than you can not expect people to let is slide and they will give you a hard time about it. Especially if you don't have an actual concrete reason. Grow up, get over it, and stop expecting people to be more tolerant of crap.
Are you serious? Do you know how much of an unintelligent intolerant douche bag you sound like? I'm plenty grown up and tolerant of a lot of things. Just because someones opinion is different doesn't make them any less of a person, or less intelligent. It makes him, and you, sound like elitist snobs when you say shit like this.

In the first 2 minutes of this review, before he even began to review the movie, Bob was already insulting people who enjoyed it. Insulting their intelligence because his snobby ass doesn't appear to like the content of the movie. What kind of credibility does this guy deserve?

His opinion is different than mine and he openly states that since his opinion is different then mine, I'm automatically a moron who doesn't deserve to drive a car or vote. Seriously? You want to defend this guy and expect me to have tolerance of his opinion? I'm the one that needs to grow up?

All of his points were opinion and opinion only. What concrete points did he make? He spends 5 minutes crying about how he didn't enjoy the movie, how he hates Micheal Bay and his movie making style. He ranted about how the movie didn't spend 40 minutes on every character so he could decide if they are likable, and then rants about how he didn't like the characters that they did spend time on.

He cried about how he doesn't like the designs of the robots. He cried because he already has to review too many military/gun toting movies. He cried because the plot used a betrayal twist. He even cried because he is tried of reviewing "summer blockbuster" movies. The end of the video he made sure it so ridiculously clear that he came into the review with bias against it to begin with.

Not one of those things is a text book, concrete, factual, or technical reason a movie is "bad." He didn't like them. Not they are "certifiably" or universally agreed upon to be "bad." What evidence, or concrete proof did he provide? What evidence do you provide to support his claims? I didn't know movie reviews had provable criteria? Must have missed that memo somewhere.

Boo hoo hoo he is tired of reviewing movies he doesn't like. Get used to it, it is your job a reviewer. That doesn't give him the right to insult people for differing opinions. Review the movie, not the audience.
 

DAPLR

New member
Nov 11, 2010
141
0
0
Well MovieBob, just like you I have my own opinion. If your tired of getting paid to watch movies, then just GTFO, you annoying slacker while us ordinary people work hard for our buck.
God!