I'm not spoiling any of the movie for myself, I'll watch that video when I see the movie. But still UP!
You're going to have to explain that one. Equilibrium seemed pretty one dimensional to me. If the idea of that movie was to point out if you want positive emotions, you need negative emotions and we all better off having both than just being emotionless - surely that's a moot point anyway...it felt to me like Equilibrium was masquerading as an intellectual action film as much as Terminator with their ongoing blurry division between humanity and robots thread...pigeon_of_doom said:I don't think I will ever understand why the Terminator and X-men films can ever claim to have had a reputation as intelligent action films. Not when films like Equilibrium exist.
Cars was pretty crappy. A Bug's life was not bad. But I think Cars was there weakest if not worst film.Cpt_Oblivious said:Have Pixar ever released a bad film?ampa451 said:I think that when it comes down to these kind of movies, Pixar is invincible.
There was at least a kind of unifying philosophical point you got from the film (no matter how obvious it may be) and I never got anything like that from Terminator or X-Men (been a while since I have seen any of these films though). I just remember an occasional musing on the nature of machines in Terminator, and some typical Marvel social commentary in X-men. Equilibrium was the best example I could come up with, as I found films like the Matrix and Dark Knight quite shallow, while films like Blade Runner or 12 Monkeys don't quite have enough action to be good comparisons. I'm not actually into action films that much, but Terminator and X-Men are hardly the poster boys for intelligence in the genre which was what I was contesting.carnkhan4 said:You're going to have to explain that one to me. Equilibrium seemed pretty one dimensional to me. If the point of that movie was to point out if you want positive emotions, you need negative emotions and we all better off having both than just being emotionless - surely that's a moot point anyway...it felt to me like Equilibrium was masquerading as an intellectual action film as much as Terminator with their ongoing blurry division between humanity and robots...
"A bug's life" and "Cars" weren't great.Cpt_Oblivious said:Have Pixar ever released a bad film?ampa451 said:I think that when it comes down to these kind of movies, Pixar is invincible.
I agree with everything you said, I quite liked Star Trek and it was nice to hear a review from him from a non-fanboy point of view. This movie looks absolutely amazing but I can't see it todayPedroSteckecilo said:I really didn't need MovieBob to tell me this was going to be good, but this was a nice review nonetheless (despite my intense disagreement with his Star Trek review *glares*).
Still you KNOW you've got a good one on your hands when watching the trailer almost makes you jump for joy.
When it comes to those two films, it's more about the balance of it to me. Terminator and X-Men aren't necessarily the "smartest" of the scifi genre, but they're smart in proportion to their action as opposed to one rising at the other's expense.pigeon_of_doom said:but Terminator and X-Men are hardly the poster boys for intelligence in the genre which was what I was contesting.
I suppose you're never really going to get a great deal of depth as that 'action' aspect is always going to be peeling away at the time in order to keep the audience interested. Just look what happened to H.G.Wells' War of the Worlds. Equilibrium at least definitely delivers on the action side and attempts some kind of message I suppose. I think the genre could do with a lot of improvement though...pigeon_of_doom said:There was at least a kind of unifying philosophical point you got from the film (no matter how obvious it may be) and I never got anything like that from Terminator or X-Men (been a while since I have seen any of these films though). I just remember an occasional musing on the nature of machines in Terminator, and some typical Marvel social commentary in X-men. Equilibrium was the best example I could come up with, as I found films like the Matrix and Dark Knight quite shallow, while films like Blade Runner or 12 Monkeys don't quite have enough action to be good comparisons. I'm not actually into action films that much, but Terminator and X-Men are hardly the poster boys for intelligence in the genre which was what I was contesting.carnkhan4 said:You're going to have to explain that one to me. Equilibrium seemed pretty one dimensional to me. If the point of that movie was to point out if you want positive emotions, you need negative emotions and we all better off having both than just being emotionless - surely that's a moot point anyway...it felt to me like Equilibrium was masquerading as an intellectual action film as much as Terminator with their ongoing blurry division between humanity and robots...
Thanks for clearing that up, I see what you were getting at now. As I only saw Terminator some time after I had played Metal Gear Solid, the nanotechnology talk was rather underwhelming. I liked the gritty aesthetic, but I only ever saw it as a brainless action film; me as a 13yr old was never going to appreciate it's cultural context.MovieBob said:When it comes to those two films, it's more about the balance of it to me. Terminator and X-Men aren't necessarily the "smartest" of the scifi genre, but they're smart in proportion to their action as opposed to one rising at the other's expense.
The Terminator films, meanwhile, were playing with REALLY out-there scifi concepts in the 80s and 90s. The first film was taking a fairly "realistic" look forward at the idea of computerized defense systems in an era when the term "battlefield computer" would still draw funny looks at the Pentagon. The second film is regarded as featuring one of the first strong visual representations of nanotechnology in the T-1000, a technology most mainstream folks had never even heard of then.
Agreed. Kurosawa showed 60 years ago that it's possible to combine action films with artistic merit (albiet with about an hour and a half of character development in Seven Samurai). The genre really should have developed much further in that regard by now.carnkhan4 said:I think the genre could do with a lot of improvement though...
I will never have anything bad said about A Bug's Life because I loved it as a kid.Darkrai said:Cars was pretty crappy. A Bug's life was not bad. But I think Cars was there weakest if not worst film.Cpt_Oblivious said:Have Pixar ever released a bad film?ampa451 said:I think that when it comes down to these kind of movies, Pixar is invincible.
I'll watch a bugs life again. I show it before and thought it was ok as a kidCpt_Oblivious said:I will never have anything bad said about A Bug's Life because I loved it as a kid.Darkrai said:Cars was pretty crappy. A Bug's life was not bad. But I think Cars was there weakest if not worst film.Cpt_Oblivious said:Have Pixar ever released a bad film?ampa451 said:I think that when it comes down to these kind of movies, Pixar is invincible.
Cars was alright, I guess..