I'm pretty sure that future historians are going to discount most of the available news media starting from June 1, 1980 and onward until infinity. (Come to think of it, future historians may actually push that back to January 1, 1041 just to be safe.) I'm also fairly certain that future historians, like modern historians, recently dead historians and died-a-long-time-ago historians, are going to discount most of Hollywood's portrayals of real figures starting from June 15, 1878, and onward until infinity squared.SNCommand said:History is going to deem the current president as a weak one considering how little control Hollywood and the rest of the media is presenting him as having, just think about the one in this movie, it isn't easy overlooking so many groups plotting an armed insurrection, not unless the heads of NSA, FBI and CIA are in on it, and if they are you've really fucked up as president.
Eh. I don't think so, simply because neither Uwe Boll nor Michael Bay would be so obviously Liberal. Michael Bay would probably remove any and all politics from the movie and Uwe Boll would have the President fly Air Force 1 in loop-de-loops through the London Eye, except wouldn't have the budget left for proper CGI and would use a ferris wheel at Coney Island and forget to take down any American flags flying in camera range.twistedmic said:Why do I get the feeling that Bob only likes this movie because Rolland Emmerich was at the helm? And that if anyone else, Micheal Bay or Owe Boll for example, Bob would have mercilessly torn it to shreds for the exact same reasons that he was praising it?
SNCommand said:This right here, the movie is presenting a president as far removed from the real one as possibleRJ Dalton said:You say it's not afraid to be about something, but what it's about is just pumping up the propaganda machine and continuing to pander to the us/them ideology that is destroying this country. To wit, Obama is not interested in peace with Iran, has put more troops into combat overseas than President Bush, is SUPPORTING a bigger and more dangerous spying scandal than Richard Nixon that has all the same qualities of McCarthyism (replacing communism with terrorist as the excuse for doing it), and has not only refused to prosecute the banks that have caused the economic problems in this country, but systematically put into place laws that further protect them from legal repercussions and allow them to continue the exploitation of the American people. If it were still Bush in office, most of the media would be up in arms about it, calling for his resignation and you'd be right along with them in the chants. But because Obama's a democrat, the media will make any excuse they can to keep from being seen as the monster he is (unless you're Fox News, but Fox is already a joke to most of the American public, so their opinion doesn't count).
I don't care if it's ballsy for Emerich to make this film about something. It would be equally ballsy for someone to make a film in which a a good-hearted, but maligned Republican president is attacked by unapologetically evil homosexual pro-abortion Muslim radicals.
It would also be equally bullshit.
A really bland protagonist
Villains with no logical motivation or rational actions
A message as close to the current mainstream ideology as possible
There's nothing edgy about this, no Roland Emmerich movie has ever been either edgy or even thought inducing, he makes what he does best, special effect summer blockbusters pandering to the Hollywood view
You would be surprised at what turns up in my facebook feed, apparently any sympathy towards the 2nd Amendment, pro-life or anti-redistribution means you deserve and should dieabell said:Yea, I don't think this is particularly novel. There's been a string of action movies with the right/republicans as the villains for the past decade. Some are really obvious (Shooter, Syriana, etc.) and some less so, (Bourne might actually have been the first of the new wave), but, it's nothing new. I'm just not sure why the political quality is a selling point here. Is the left really interested in wishfulfillment of killing a bunch of Republicans?
Agreed, for people who concern themselves with politics beyond putting false (and at this point in his administration, ignorant) hope in a figure head this movie comes off as intellectually insulting, like if you put Fox News in movie form and then made it appeal to the left wing. I guess it's cathartic but if you're looking for this kind of catharsis then you've been lying to yourself about this administration. And I hate seeing my fellow Americans being vilified the way this movie does, hardly a message of unification for a movie which apparently cites Abraham Lincoln as an idol. Let's just make all the evil right wing caricatures the scapegoat and pretend Obama isn't guilty of anything.RJ Dalton said:You say it's not afraid to be about something, but what it's about is just pumping up the propaganda machine and continuing to pander to the us/them ideology that is destroying this country. To wit, Obama is not interested in peace with Iran, has put more troops into combat overseas than President Bush, is SUPPORTING a bigger and more dangerous spying scandal than Richard Nixon that has all the same qualities of McCarthyism (replacing communism with terrorist as the excuse for doing it), and has not only refused to prosecute the banks that have caused the economic problems in this country, but systematically put into place laws that further protect them from legal repercussions and allow them to continue the exploitation of the American people. If it were still Bush in office, most of the media would be up in arms about it, calling for his resignation and you'd be right along with them in the chants. But because Obama's a democrat, the media will make any excuse they can to keep from being seen as the monster he is (unless you're Fox News, but Fox is already a joke to most of the American public, so their opinion doesn't count).
I don't care if it's ballsy for Emerich to make this film about something. It would be equally ballsy for someone to make a film in which a a good-hearted, but maligned Republican president is attacked by unapologetically evil homosexual pro-abortion Muslim radicals.
It would also be equally bullshit.
Yea, I guess I defriended that group a while ago. I have little patience for that sort of demagoguery. Also,whenever I see that sort of revolutionary speech from the left, (NRA VP should be shot, Occupy, etc), I always wonder about the practical quality of how that's going to happen. Demographically speaking, the Right in this country is significantly (though not exclusively) better armed and trained and the military/police forces are disproportionately conservative as well. Basic arithmetic seems to not be on their side re violent insurrection. Which might be why they need these sorts of fantasies where Barack Obama fires rocket launchers. There just seems to be way too much cognitive dissonance going on.SNCommand said:You would be surprised at what turns up in my facebook feed, apparently any sympathy towards the 2nd Amendment, pro-life or anti-redistribution means you deserve and should die
I'm not saying Republican causes are right, but people are throwing about the execute argument a bit too much to my liking these days
There's been movies and series about the subject of armed revolutions though, some have rather lackluster portrayal like Nolan's Dark Knight Rises, but Legend of Korra [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZoDAeezq08] had a very good portrayal, kinda strange thought that one of the most right wing things to come out of Hollywood these days is a animated show on nickelodeon, to be fair the Equalists were portrayed with a bit of sympathy, but they were still very much the villainsabell said:Yea, I guess I defriended that group a while ago. I have little patience for that sort of demagoguery. Also,whenever I see that sort of revolutionary speech from the left, (NRA VP should be shot, Occupy, etc), I always wonder about the practical quality of how that's going to happen. Demographically speaking, the Right in this country is significantly (though not exclusively) better armed and trained and the military/police forces are disproportionately conservative as well. Basic arithmetic seems to not be on their side re violent insurrection. Which might be why they need these sorts of fantasies where Barack Obama fires rocket launchers. There just seems to be way too much cognitive dissonance going on.
Heh, you know I had a really fun time with Legend of Korra and the Equalists. Huh, some people might be pissed that they live with a bunch superpowered assholes who can terrorize them however they want? That seems reasonable, I'm pro chi blocking/zappy hands. Wait, now they want to depower everybody? No, you see, now you're being dicks. And you're upset about people being dicks, that was the point from the beginning. And now the superpowered government is cracking down on chi blockers because they're dens of anti-super powered people. Or just because they can actually defend themselves? Harrblegarblegarble. It's all so deliciously annoying and plausible, layers and layers of people doing dumb things, or having good ideas but missing and becoming dicks. Also, I think Penny Arcade [http://penny-arcade.com/comic/2012/06/25] got it right.SNCommand said:There's been movies and series about the subject of armed revolutions though, some have rather lackluster portrayal like Nolan's Dark Knight Rises, but Legend of Korra [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZoDAeezq08] had a very good portrayal, kinda strange thought that one of the most right wing things to come out of Hollywood these days is a animated show on nickelodeon, to be fair the Equalists were portrayed with a bit of sympathy, but they were still very much the villains
Thanks for the Penny Arcade strip, personally I thought the whole love triangle was kinda awkward, but to be fair I have seen it done much much worse, it's actually kinda human of themabell said:Heh, you know I had a really fun time with Legend of Korra and the Equalists. Huh, some people might be pissed that they live with a bunch superpowered assholes who can terrorize them however they want? That seems reasonable, I'm pro chi blocking/zappy hands. Wait, now they want to depower everybody? No, you see, now you're being dicks. And you're upset about people being dicks, that was the point from the beginning. And now the superpowered government is cracking down on chi blockers because they're dens of anti-super powered people. Or just because they can actually defend themselves? Harrblegarblegarble. It's all so deliciously annoying and plausible, layers and layers of people doing dumb things, or having good ideas but missing and becoming dicks. Also, I think Penny Arcade [http://penny-arcade.com/comic/2012/06/25] got it right.