Update: Seems Canadian non-pubclubbers are the only ones seeing this.
Update: So, ad-only content that is using article space rather than ad space.
Ads are important to the survival of the Escapist. We all understand that bills and employees have to be paid and that it's the nature of this business that you'll do some cross tie-ins with advertisers in order to generate revenue. I don't run an ad-blocker nor do I believe it is correct to do so. Ad-space is clearly visible, and articles have, until today, been fair and followed the guidelines:
Does this mean the Code of Ethics is just a cynical promise you posted once to assuage Gamergate during a contraversial period? Or does it actually MEAN anything?
Update: So, ad-only content that is using article space rather than ad space.
Ads are important to the survival of the Escapist. We all understand that bills and employees have to be paid and that it's the nature of this business that you'll do some cross tie-ins with advertisers in order to generate revenue. I don't run an ad-blocker nor do I believe it is correct to do so. Ad-space is clearly visible, and articles have, until today, been fair and followed the guidelines:
Having Pokerstars commission multiple articles to say 'Poker is good for you' sends a message that your opinion and your research CAN be bought and paid for. When an article appears with a headline suggesting there's a study that poker is beneficial, as a journalist, it's expected that article is posted because your research and study and investigation found evidence for this to be potentially true. This is the fundamental point of journalism. When I see that these articles can be bought and paid for by advertisers, and I read in your code of ethics that you're not supposed to sell your journalistic cred to advertisers, it makes me concerned for the future of the website.Sites allow advertisers to commission community events, branded entertainment, mini-games, and other custom content on our Sites. Sites do not allow advertisers to commission opinion or reviews or influence review scores or placement within numerical lists or guides. In short, our space and time is something we can share with advertisers, but not our opinion. Since these lines can be blurry, consider these examples: We would not allow an advertiser to commission a listicle such as "Top 10 Shooters" because of the implicit pressure for the advertiser's game to be listed as #1. Instead, we would offer the advertiser a listicle such as "Top 10 Weapons in Call of Duty". We would not allow an advertiser to commission a video review of their game, but we would allow an advertiser to commission us to live stream a play- through of their game so that our audience could judge the game for itself.
Does this mean the Code of Ethics is just a cynical promise you posted once to assuage Gamergate during a contraversial period? Or does it actually MEAN anything?