HT_Black said:
HOW TO NOT do it:
George Orwell (Fair enough, Animal Farm was good and whatnot, but you have to admit that his pacing was best equated to a chronic stroke victim in a marathon.)
Nah, the pacing in Animal Farm is OK. It could have been a bit better in 1984, I guess. But what I don't like about Orwell is how, in 1984, he introduces a character called Julia who is completely unaffected by the propaganda of Big Brother, after he's spent all the practically plotless pages up until that point explaining why the indoctrination of that totalitarian state makes such a thing impossible. If it's perfect, why isn't she affected? And if it is in fact
not a perfect indoctrination system, why does it get so perfect results?
1984 isn't a book you read for the story, though. So complaining about it is like complaining that Crime and Punishment isn't a very good bedroom farce; that is, that was never the point. And a clear plot isn't always necessary or even good, books like David Copperfield or Hopscotch are fantastic, and any plot isn't needed nor would it be an improvement.
But I personally believe that the reason Orwell is so heavily represented here isn't because of his (admittedly very high) quality as a writer; it's because he's modern, of our age (or thereabouts) and he writes in English. I've noticed that most of the writers here are fairly modern writers who write in English. So we have at least 51% modern English writers, and less than 49%
every writer of
every language from
every country apart from modern English writers.