You can't avoid politics. Even not explicitly mentioning politics is political: the elephant in the room cannot be avoided. Eurovision is an opportunity for a country to show itself off, and if a country is busy doing things like invading its neighbours, repressing its citizens, gagging free speech or running the world's largest open air prison camp, what we really mean by not mentioning politics is implicitly excusing all that political shit it's doing. That's why places like Russia have rubbed their hands with glee at things like the football world cup, because it helps them conceal all the shady stuff that's going on with a flashy spectacle.McElroy said:And... As evidenced in this thread too, you shouldn't mix politics into Eurovision.
When she did her duet with the other guy (Quavo? Quavi?) they turned their backs at some point: one had an Israeli flag stitched on the back of their outfit, the other a Palestinian flag.Jute88 said:Apparently there was also a Palestine flag in Madonna's show, but I didn't see it.
* * *
I don't like this relatively new voting system with the jury votes, and then the public votes summed up on top. I think it's really unkind to the performers to be flying high, and then suddenly find they're actually miles away from winning because someone suddenly got 250 points added and they only got 35. I'd rather they went back to the national presenters giving a combined country score of the jury and public.
I accept that in this system you can sometimes tell the winner a mile off, and the new one ratchets up the tension to the end, but to me it starts to feel like a lottery. I am also so utterly bored sick of stupid, absurdly extended, "dramatic" pauses until they reveal the result, now tediously ubiquitous. It doesn't make me feel more suspense, it makes me irritated and fed up. I also feel unhappy for some of the performers, especially the young ones, who must have a huge amount of their hopes and dreams tied up in the process, being screwed with for entertainment.